지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper is focused on my opinion that aims to investigate problems in the provisions on the Non-performance especially Incomplete-Performance in the Draft 2013 of the Korean Civil Code, and to present a alternative proposal for this issue.
To achieve the aim of this paper, in the first place I have analyzed the phase of the theory of Incomplete-Performance by investigating the system of regulations of the current Korean Civil Code on the Non-Performance, and by investigating whether or not the theory of Incomplete-Performance(it means an incomplete-performance or a positive violation of the obligatory right that provokes the expanded prejudice to creditor) is approved as a resonable theory of interpretation of the current Korean Civil Code, and by investigating whether the theory that insist the §390 of the current Korean Civil Code is a positive legal basis of the theory is right or not.
Through these investigations I have arrived at the conclusion that while we admit the §390 of the current Korean Civil Code covers incomplete-performance, from this it is not necessarily drawn the conclusion that the concept of the Incomplete-Performance of this provision covers a positive violation of an obligatory right that provokes the expanded prejudice to the creditor that means primarily a tort liability, it should be regarded that whether the §390 of the current Korean Civil Code covers a positive violation of an obligatory right that provokes the expanded prejudice to the creditor or not is entrusted the theory and the judicial precedents.
The Draft 2013 of the Korean Civil Code propose to stipulate the claim rights of “nacherfüllung”(it means a right of creditor to demand making subsequent completion) that has been dicussed for a long time in lecturing theory as an effect of incomplete- performance. However under the present circumstances that the theory and the judicial precedents about the claim rights of “nacherfüllung” is not yet clearly established, and what"s more, the endeavor to revise the Law of Seller’s Warranty has been aborted, the revision of the §390 of the Korean Civil Code by stipulating the claim rights of “nacherfüllung” as a general effct of the Incomplete-Performance might provoke a serious disoder in the interpretation of the legal conditions and effect of the claim rights of “nacherfüllung” in relation with the Seller’s Warranty.
Therefore I think that it is desirable to delete temporarily the provisions about the claim rights of “nacherfüllung” in the Draft 2013 of the Korean Civil Code, and to stipulate it after ending full discussion about the claim rights of “nacherfüllung” and when the Law of Seller’s Warranty will be revised.
To achieve the aim of this paper, in the first place I have analyzed the phase of the theory of Incomplete-Performance by investigating the system of regulations of the current Korean Civil Code on the Non-Performance, and by investigating whether or not the theory of Incomplete-Performance(it means an incomplete-performance or a positive violation of the obligatory right that provokes the expanded prejudice to creditor) is approved as a resonable theory of interpretation of the current Korean Civil Code, and by investigating whether the theory that insist the §390 of the current Korean Civil Code is a positive legal basis of the theory is right or not.
Through these investigations I have arrived at the conclusion that while we admit the §390 of the current Korean Civil Code covers incomplete-performance, from this it is not necessarily drawn the conclusion that the concept of the Incomplete-Performance of this provision covers a positive violation of an obligatory right that provokes the expanded prejudice to the creditor that means primarily a tort liability, it should be regarded that whether the §390 of the current Korean Civil Code covers a positive violation of an obligatory right that provokes the expanded prejudice to the creditor or not is entrusted the theory and the judicial precedents.
The Draft 2013 of the Korean Civil Code propose to stipulate the claim rights of “nacherfüllung”(it means a right of creditor to demand making subsequent completion) that has been dicussed for a long time in lecturing theory as an effect of incomplete- performance. However under the present circumstances that the theory and the judicial precedents about the claim rights of “nacherfüllung” is not yet clearly established, and what"s more, the endeavor to revise the Law of Seller’s Warranty has been aborted, the revision of the §390 of the Korean Civil Code by stipulating the claim rights of “nacherfüllung” as a general effct of the Incomplete-Performance might provoke a serious disoder in the interpretation of the legal conditions and effect of the claim rights of “nacherfüllung” in relation with the Seller’s Warranty.
Therefore I think that it is desirable to delete temporarily the provisions about the claim rights of “nacherfüllung” in the Draft 2013 of the Korean Civil Code, and to stipulate it after ending full discussion about the claim rights of “nacherfüllung” and when the Law of Seller’s Warranty will be revised.
목차
Ⅰ. 서설
Ⅱ. 現行民法에서의 不完全履行論의 位相
Ⅲ. 제390조의 立法沿革과 不完全履行論의 繼受 필요성 여부
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (51)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
민법의 제정 과정에 대한 입법평가
법과정책
2018 .01
-
현행 민법규정의 적용 및 해석과 관련한 몇 가지 법적 문제- 총칙 및 물권규정을 중심으로 -
재산법연구
2020 .01
-
일본 개정민법상의 계약부적합 개념과 책임에 관한 고찰
민사법의 이론과 실무
2019 .01
-
법률행위 · 채무불이행에 관한 민법 개정 작업 보고
저스티스
2025 .02
-
‘사단·조합 준별론’ 재검토 小考 - 단체·법인론의 기본 문제 -
비교사법
2020 .02
-
대상청구권에 관한 민법개정안의 검토 -적용범위 및 반환범위-
민사법의 이론과 실무
2015 .01
-
한국민법에 있어서 일본민법의 영향과 역사적 과제 - 서론적 고찰 -
법학논집
2016 .01
-
일본 개정민법상의 도급의 계약부적합 책임에 관한 고찰
국제거래와 법
2019 .10
-
중국 「민법전」의 채권법 체계에 관한 연구
법학연구
2021 .10
-
일본 민법상의 채무불이행에 의한 손해배상청구권의 발생요건
국제거래와 법
2022 .10
-
기본권보장과 민법의 역할에 대한 서론적 논의
헌법판례연구
2015 .06
-
2015년 베트남 민법의 구조와 주요 개정 내용
비교사법
2016 .08
-
민법의 기초자 가인 김병로
사법
2023 .03
-
수급인의 하자담보책임과 채무불이행책임의 경합에 관한 일고 - 대법원 2020. 6. 11. 선고 2019다2000126 판결 -
재산법연구
2020 .01
-
채무불이행법의 국제적 동향과 한국민법의 개정
법학연구
2016 .11
-
유치권에 관한 민법 및 관련법의 개정방안 : 민법 및 관련법의 개정시안을 중심으로
한양법학
2018 .05
-
제3취득자의 변제에 관한 민법 제364조의검토 및 개정안
법학연구
2018 .01
-
민법 제806조에 대한 비판적 검토
성균관법학
2018 .09
-
중국 민법전 제정의 최신 동향에 관한 고찰 : 2016년 민법총칙 초안을 중심으로
법학연구
2016 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-360-002711420