메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김희연 (고려대학교)
저널정보
한국사연구회 한국사연구 韓國史硏究 제170호
발행연도
2015.9
수록면
303 - 353 (51page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article analyzed the generating process of issues and the backgrounds of rupture of negotiation for treaty revision between Korean and Japanese governments from 1891 to 1892. The treaties in question were Commerce Regulations in 1883 and Fishery Regulations in 1889, which specified Japanese fishermen’s right to work in fishing at Cholla, Kyongsang, Kangwon, and Hamkyeong provinces. Since Chechew(濟州) abounded in marine products, Japanese fishermen came near to Chechew, which led to several sanguinary collisions between the two subjects. Charles W. Legendre, entitled as a Commissioner for the Korean government, proposed excluding Chechew from fishing grounds and revising related clauses on fishery. In return, Korean government suggested opening of Daedong River (Py?ngyang) to trade, which Japanese had coveted before. Yet newspapers from Nagasaki and other Kyushu regions which had deep interests in fishery in Chechew criticized the idea of exchanging Chechew and Daedong River. Negative prospect on the economic profit which the opening of Daedong River would bring about, suggested by Hara Takashi who investigated the site, also prevented Japanese government from accepting the idea. Meanwhile, Legendre’s revised draft for fishing treaty which was a compromise with Japanese draft, made Korean people disagree with his idea. Various changes surrounding the negotiation rendered it faltering. Jingoists rose to power in Japanese assembly and Russian attempt to lay Trans-Siberian Railway accelerated progress in Anglo-Japanese relations, especially in the treaty revision between the two. Along with international changes, internal changes such as shift in the person in charge of Foreign Affairs in Korean government further aggravated the situation. Due to negative judgement of powers on the issues which were proposed during negotiation, along with all those reasons mentioned above, the negotiation came to end in a rupture.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 조일간 조약개정문제의 대두와 교섭담당 판무사 파견
Ⅲ. 1892년 조약개정교섭의 진행과정과 교섭 결렬의 배경
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈ABSTRACT〉

참고문헌 (51)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-911-001947616