지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Act of the Debtors’ Revival and the Bankruptcy (Integrated Insolvency Act; IIA) was enacted to unify legal systems of the debtors’ revival and the bankruptcy and to improve revival and liquidation of the debtors under difficult economic situation and to integrate the four laws, that is to say, the Company Reorganization Law, the Composition Law, the Bankruptcy Law and the Law of the Individual Debtors Revival, etc to make single law system. However, the IIA did not put punishment regulations in good order to integrate punishment regulations of the four laws without amendment and to enumerate them.
The study examined problems of the punishment regulation in IIA to suggest improvement.
The findings were as follows:
Firstly, some of overlapped regulations of the fraudulent bankruptcy crimes were required to integrate them and enact single regulation, for instance, Article 643 of the fraudulent revival crime, Article 644 of the fraudulent revival crime of the third party, Article 650 of the fraudulent bankruptcy crime, Article 652 of the fraudulent bankruptcy and negligence bankruptcy crime of the ones having specific positions and Article 654 of the fraudulent bankruptcy crime of the third party, etc.
Secondly, each behaviour of the Article 651 of the negligence bankruptcy crime was difficult to admit of justification that could be an object to punish, so that it had better remove it completely.
Thirdly, paragraph 2 of Article 648 described crime nature being different from that of paragraph 1, so that the paragraph 2 was demanded to incorporate it into Article 649 having similar crime nature.
Fourthly, trade book and closed book related behaviour, for instance, paragraph 3 of Article 643, and paragraph 3 and paragraph 4 of Article 650, commonly occurred as a means to conceal properties of the bankrupt foundation, so that those paragraphs were required to separate them from both Article 643 and Article 650 and to have different systems and to alleviate legal punishment. And, trade book related behaviour was demanded to expand its object and to reduce behavioral forms.
Fifthly, to remove a gap of conventional punishment or meet amendment of the IIC, new regulations were required to enact them, for instance, punishment of illegal behaviour of the ones who possessed continuously, punishment of the other party and punishment of the corporation.
The study examined problems of the punishment regulation in IIA to suggest improvement.
The findings were as follows:
Firstly, some of overlapped regulations of the fraudulent bankruptcy crimes were required to integrate them and enact single regulation, for instance, Article 643 of the fraudulent revival crime, Article 644 of the fraudulent revival crime of the third party, Article 650 of the fraudulent bankruptcy crime, Article 652 of the fraudulent bankruptcy and negligence bankruptcy crime of the ones having specific positions and Article 654 of the fraudulent bankruptcy crime of the third party, etc.
Secondly, each behaviour of the Article 651 of the negligence bankruptcy crime was difficult to admit of justification that could be an object to punish, so that it had better remove it completely.
Thirdly, paragraph 2 of Article 648 described crime nature being different from that of paragraph 1, so that the paragraph 2 was demanded to incorporate it into Article 649 having similar crime nature.
Fourthly, trade book and closed book related behaviour, for instance, paragraph 3 of Article 643, and paragraph 3 and paragraph 4 of Article 650, commonly occurred as a means to conceal properties of the bankrupt foundation, so that those paragraphs were required to separate them from both Article 643 and Article 650 and to have different systems and to alleviate legal punishment. And, trade book related behaviour was demanded to expand its object and to reduce behavioral forms.
Fifthly, to remove a gap of conventional punishment or meet amendment of the IIC, new regulations were required to enact them, for instance, punishment of illegal behaviour of the ones who possessed continuously, punishment of the other party and punishment of the corporation.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 도산제도와 도산범죄의 의의
Ⅲ. 벌칙규정의 주요 내용
Ⅳ. 벌칙규정의 문제점과 개선방안
Ⅴ. 나오며
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (6)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
파산범죄에 관한 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2005 .12
-
미국 연방파산법 제15장의 구조와 시사점
원광법학
2012 .01
-
中國의 破産制度에 관한 硏究 : 個人破産立法을 中心으로
비교사법
2009 .12
-
통합도산법상 임금채권의 보호
노동법논총
2013 .12
-
형법상 미수범 감경규정의 특가법 적용문제
한양법학
2013 .08
-
일본의 파산법 동향 : 최근 우리 파산절차 개정 관련 쟁점을 중심으로
비교사법
2009 .09
-
법정범(法定犯) 의의(意義) 상의 허위파산죄
비교형사법연구
2013 .01
-
통합도산법상 도산감독기능의 개선방안에 관한 연구 : 미국, 일본의 입법례를 바탕으로
법이론실무연구
2014 .04
-
국제도산사건에 대한 한국과 중국의 도산법제 비교
법학연구
2018 .03
-
소비자파산에 있어서 파산자의 면책에 관한 연구
법학연구
2005 .11
-
기업도산시 집단적 노사관계의 문제점
노동법포럼
2010 .04
-
개인파산의 현황과 법적 과제
중앙법학
2009 .04
-
채무자회생 및 파산에 관한 법률안의 주요내용과 개선방안
국제회계연구
2003 .10
-
도산절차에서의 개별적 근로관계에 관한 검토
노동법포럼
2010 .04
-
누범 규정에 대한 비판적 고찰
法學論文集
2016 .01
-
기업의 도산과 관련한 노동법상 쟁점과 과제
법학연구
2005 .12
-
형사특별법 정비방안(2) 특정강력범죄의 처벌에 관한 특례법
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2008 .12
-
법정형체계의 정비방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2006 .12
-
보건의료분야 형벌법규의 현황과 주요 내용
비교형사법연구
2009 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000783362