지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Recently, the lack of water has become a serious problem. It gave rise to complications between the central administrative agency and the local government, as well as the local governments and the public agencies. This trouble has been brought forth by the change of times. The right to the use of water has been based upon the custom of an agricultural society of the time when the Civil Law of 1958 was enacted. Also, it was caused by the Act on Construction of Dams and Assistance to their Environs, Registration of right for Dams Use Act, Public Waters Management Act, Rearrangement of Agricultural and Fishing Villages Act, the conflict between the Civil Law and River Act, and etc.
According to Article 231, the Civil Law defends the right to access public rivers provided that those engaged in agriculture and in the banks of public rivers draw necessary water from the river for their business so long as they do not disturb the use of water by other persons rightfully entitled to such. Nowadays this is not sufficient enough to solve the issue facing the lack of water, as it is difficult to meet the society's demand. The best policy is to integrate the current policy into that of a single statutory water rights system, so as to solve the legal problem and to settle the matter surrounding the usage of water. However, given the various conditions of our country, the reality is that the various bottlenecks regarding the right to the use of water make it difficult to make such ideals happen.
This study attempts to harmonize the right for usage of dams along with the right to the usage of public rivers in the Civil Law. The study consists of five parts; the first including the instruction, the second and the third reviewing the right to use public river under the Civil Law and the right to the use of water in the individual statutes, the fourth discussing the legal principles of the legal nature and extinctive prescription between the right to use public rivers under the Civil Law and right for dams in its statute. In particular, I propose a reinterpretation of the right to the usage of public rivers, which are to be discussed separately from real estate. Finally, I conclude a need for an amendment to the right of water usage in the individual statutes and a revision to the system of the right for using water in Korea.
According to Article 231, the Civil Law defends the right to access public rivers provided that those engaged in agriculture and in the banks of public rivers draw necessary water from the river for their business so long as they do not disturb the use of water by other persons rightfully entitled to such. Nowadays this is not sufficient enough to solve the issue facing the lack of water, as it is difficult to meet the society's demand. The best policy is to integrate the current policy into that of a single statutory water rights system, so as to solve the legal problem and to settle the matter surrounding the usage of water. However, given the various conditions of our country, the reality is that the various bottlenecks regarding the right to the use of water make it difficult to make such ideals happen.
This study attempts to harmonize the right for usage of dams along with the right to the usage of public rivers in the Civil Law. The study consists of five parts; the first including the instruction, the second and the third reviewing the right to use public river under the Civil Law and the right to the use of water in the individual statutes, the fourth discussing the legal principles of the legal nature and extinctive prescription between the right to use public rivers under the Civil Law and right for dams in its statute. In particular, I propose a reinterpretation of the right to the usage of public rivers, which are to be discussed separately from real estate. Finally, I conclude a need for an amendment to the right of water usage in the individual statutes and a revision to the system of the right for using water in Korea.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 용수권의 의의
Ⅲ. 주요 용수권의 법리
Ⅳ. 주요 용수권의 법적문제
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
우리나라 하천법에서의 하천 유지유량과 환경개선용수
法學論文集
2011 .01
-
Analysis and Conservation Management on Water Quality in Korea’s Four Major Rivers
한국비교정부학보
2010 .01
-
우리나라에서의 물분쟁 해소를 위한 개선방안
과학기술법연구
2009 .01
-
춘천시 물값 다툼의 문제점과 대안
강원법학
2006 .06
-
수자원 분야에서의 민간참여 가능성에 관한 연구
국토연구
2001 .10
-
정량ㆍ정성적 분석을 통한 하천등급 결정기준
국토연구
2004 .06
-
농촌용수의 효율적 이용 및 관리방안
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2010 .10
-
중국 수생태계 법제도의 쟁점 고찰－ 미국과 EU법제도의 시사점을 중심으로 －
경영법률
2015 .01
-
댐사용권과 댐물 사용료에 관한 법적 분석
法學論文集
2011 .01
-
수자원의 합리적인 배분 : 수리권을 중심으로
강원법학
2007 .06
-
지역 하천의 이용행태 조사 및 이용 활성화 방향 분석
한국지역개발학회지
2014 .06
-
[SESSION C2 수리계획/확률응용]하천 수질관리 시스템에서 최적화를 위한 유전알고리즘의 개발
한국경영과학회 학술대회논문집
2001 .10
-
댐용수 사용료 징수권과 관련된 갈등 조절 : 한강을 중심으로
환경정책
2009 .05
-
하천발원지의 생태관광자원 활용 연구
관광연구저널
2011 .04
-
로마법과 우리 민법상 물에 관한 규정들에 대한 비교 연구
법사학연구
2016 .04
-
호주의 환경용수 배분 정책
환경정책
2013 .12
-
물 수요관리 평가
강원법학
2007 .06
-
농업부문 가상수(virtual water) 도입 및 활용을 위한 기초연구
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2012 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000498717