지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As for the problem of the water price, we need to review the fundamental principles such as the guarantee of the vested water right and the equitable utilization in water usage. Although exclusive water right has been granted to the State or the Korea Water Resources Corporation(KWRC) by law, no organization, even the State, can solely dominate the usage and the distribution of water resources. Because a river isn't taken care of only by the State or KWRC but also the local governments nearby rivers, which measure the quality and quantity of water. As residents nearby dam have the right to use water, the induction of 'the regional water right' is highly in demand. Since natural resources like water is the thing to use, not to own, the national patent on it should be for the right of management, not of ownership(the Constitutional Law Article 120, Clause 2).
Accordingly, through harmony between those principles above, we must try to maximize democratization of water use. So any local government can't oppose the equitable principle between the upper stream region and the lower without legitimate reasons. In fact, no water user in a upper stream can possess water exclusively. But the argument made by the KWRC which distorts Chun-chon city's water usage is absolutely absurd, misleading the essence of the problem. Conversely, KWRC's attitude of keeping unreasonable standards makes it hard to avoid the criticism that it is only pursuing the maximum interest using its monopolistic position, the supplier of water. The KWRC and the Ministry of Construction and Transportation must clarify the several doubts come out in the process of interpreting a proviso in Dam Construction Act(abbreviated name) §35①.
Meanwhile, the KWRC seems to struggle with understanding these two in water price discussion which are completely separate, the amount of water and the quality of water. KWRC's statement that it finished so called "water distribution" according to Water Budget Analysis is not really realistic. It is only their "thinking" that it distributes certain amount of water to this and that region. However, though it is said that KWRC supplies the stored water in Soyang Dam to Seoul, we can never be sure whether the water is from there solely. As a result, KWRC needs to change its view from getting the water price by unrealistic standards to checking through the quality of received and returned water. As a matter of fact, it's the question of the quality, not the quantity.
Then, we have to regard the Water Budget Analysis based on the spot of Hangang Bridge and the water usage of the region nearby a river as separate things. Unless the amount of water usage goes beyond the scope of standard minimum flow, it's doesn't matter. We should set a goal to return water after use to the river as much, and pure as possible. For these reasons it's desirable to practice “the system of water pollution cap” after the prerequisites such as the unfairness between upper and lower stream etc., are solved first.
Accordingly, through harmony between those principles above, we must try to maximize democratization of water use. So any local government can't oppose the equitable principle between the upper stream region and the lower without legitimate reasons. In fact, no water user in a upper stream can possess water exclusively. But the argument made by the KWRC which distorts Chun-chon city's water usage is absolutely absurd, misleading the essence of the problem. Conversely, KWRC's attitude of keeping unreasonable standards makes it hard to avoid the criticism that it is only pursuing the maximum interest using its monopolistic position, the supplier of water. The KWRC and the Ministry of Construction and Transportation must clarify the several doubts come out in the process of interpreting a proviso in Dam Construction Act(abbreviated name) §35①.
Meanwhile, the KWRC seems to struggle with understanding these two in water price discussion which are completely separate, the amount of water and the quality of water. KWRC's statement that it finished so called "water distribution" according to Water Budget Analysis is not really realistic. It is only their "thinking" that it distributes certain amount of water to this and that region. However, though it is said that KWRC supplies the stored water in Soyang Dam to Seoul, we can never be sure whether the water is from there solely. As a result, KWRC needs to change its view from getting the water price by unrealistic standards to checking through the quality of received and returned water. As a matter of fact, it's the question of the quality, not the quantity.
Then, we have to regard the Water Budget Analysis based on the spot of Hangang Bridge and the water usage of the region nearby a river as separate things. Unless the amount of water usage goes beyond the scope of standard minimum flow, it's doesn't matter. We should set a goal to return water after use to the river as much, and pure as possible. For these reasons it's desirable to practice “the system of water pollution cap” after the prerequisites such as the unfairness between upper and lower stream etc., are solved first.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제제기
Ⅱ. 물값 다툼의 논점과 문제점
Ⅲ. 댐건설등법 제35조 1항과 춘천시 물값
Ⅳ. 대안 모색
〈abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
물값분쟁에 대한 판례 검토
중앙법학
2011 .12
-
우리나라에서의 물분쟁 해소를 위한 개선방안
과학기술법연구
2009 .01
-
수자원의 합리적인 배분 : 수리권을 중심으로
강원법학
2007 .06
-
물 수요관리 평가
강원법학
2007 .06
-
농촌용수의 효율적 이용 및 관리방안
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2010 .10
-
농업부문 가상수(virtual water) 도입 및 활용을 위한 기초연구
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2012 .12
-
물사용 인식 및 실천에 관한 조사 연구-대구광역시 초·중등교사를 대상으로-
환경교육
2004 .12
-
수자원 분야에서의 민간참여 가능성에 관한 연구
국토연구
2001 .10
-
중국 수생태계 법제도의 쟁점 고찰－ 미국과 EU법제도의 시사점을 중심으로 －
경영법률
2015 .01
-
안전한 수돗물의 안정적인 공급을 위한 정수기술 도입 및 정수장 운영 방안
경기논단
2000 .04
-
우리나라 하천법에서의 하천 유지유량과 환경개선용수
法學論文集
2011 .01
-
Analysis and Conservation Management on Water Quality in Korea’s Four Major Rivers
한국비교정부학보
2010 .01
-
지속가능발전 물 교육 내용체계를 활용한 대학생들의 물 인식 조사
환경교육
2012 .06
-
호주의 환경용수 배분 정책
환경정책
2013 .12
-
생활용수 수요 분석
자원·환경경제연구
2000 .01
-
학교음용수 관리 및 이용실태
한국학교ㆍ지역보건교육학회지
2000 .01
-
우리나라의 물 관리를 위한 법제적 전략 : 유럽연합의 경험을 참고하여
법학논총
2018 .05
-
물인권에 관한 국제적 논의의 동향
홍익법학
2012 .01
-
초등학생을 위한 물 환경교육 애니메이션 학습 프로그램의 개발 및 적용
환경교육
2010 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018424960