지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Attorneys belong to the professional due to performing as legal specialists. It is the primary appearance for attorneys to pursue public benefits in relation to serve the public. The constitutional law, attorney law, civil and criminal procedural law, etc. establish that attorneys’ performances are closely related with the public spirit. Recently, there is a critique between professional and the public on their performances. If we understand attorneys with economical aspect, they will be positioned as service providers who contribute legal services from legal service markets. However, if attorneys abandon the publicity from their performance or go back on their “loyalty to the system of law,” they will be divested of the reason for being attorneys.
The article 12 on the constitutional law secures physical rights and makes a ground on judges, prosecutors and attorneys. This article is eligible for the constitutional underpin on the attorney system. The constitutional law establishes the duties of attorneys as the assistants for the arrested and the restricted associate in criminal cases. Although attorneys are not the public officials, the constitutional law secures attorney system in the reason of the publicity on their duties.
Attorneys are charged to defend the fundamental human rights and to realize social justice (Article 1.(1) on Attorney law). Article 2 on Attorney law states attorneys are the legal professionals holding the publicity. There are some cases that specify the professionals with the publicity such as the article 2 on Attorney law and Article 1.2 on Tax accountant law which establishes, “A tax accountant is the tax professional with the publicity.” Attorneys have their duties of realizing organization to protect human rights and do their legal tasks by delegation from the parties to the lawsuit or others. In this special quality, attorneys take the roles of the publicity and work as deputies. It is needed to guarantee attorneys’ performances with the publicity such as ①independence on the attorneys’ performances, ②freedom and restriction on delegation, ③regulation on fees, ④ disciplinary system, ⑤investigation of the delegated case by Legal Professional Conduct Council, etc.
(1) Article 2 on attorney law establishes and secures the independence from its phrase, “Attorneys do their duties independently and freely.” However, it does not define the independent subject in specific. The attorneys’ independence was important in the meaning of the independent from the national powers and the freedom against the governmental authorities. This concept also needs to be independent from the individual faith such as the clients and the attorneys’ own outlooks.
(2) The freedom on attorneys’ duties are commonly in trouble with its relation on the delegated cases. In principle, it is considered that whether attorneys delegate the cases from their clients or not as the freedom of the professionals. Nevertheless, they are charged not to refuse the offer wrongly and there are some cases that they should refuse to delegate. There might be some occasions to prohibit, restrict and receive the delegations in certain.
(3) The reason for occurring conflict on the attorneys’ fees is in relation to highly demand of attorneys’ fees. The critique that calls attorneys as the merchants is started for this reason. Thus, the bill of attorneys’ ethics states detailed regulations. The article 32 on the bill establishes, “attorneys cannot make a demand on fees in the boundary of its stipulation or without valid reasons.” (4) The disciplinary system of attorneys is the most enforceable measure to maintain the publicity on their duties. Their disciplinary actions should be taken from the independent institutions in advance rather than governmental organs. Furthermore, the disciplinary actions on attorneys should be implemented fairly and in moderate.
(5) The article 88 on attorney law establishes, “Legal Professional Conduct Council has purpose to erect legal ethics and to construct wholesome legal atmosphere.” Especially, the council was established to dispel national suspicions on granted the privileges of one’s former post and to recover the faith of the courts and the prosecutors’ offices by stamping out legal brokers.
The article 12 on the constitutional law secures physical rights and makes a ground on judges, prosecutors and attorneys. This article is eligible for the constitutional underpin on the attorney system. The constitutional law establishes the duties of attorneys as the assistants for the arrested and the restricted associate in criminal cases. Although attorneys are not the public officials, the constitutional law secures attorney system in the reason of the publicity on their duties.
Attorneys are charged to defend the fundamental human rights and to realize social justice (Article 1.(1) on Attorney law). Article 2 on Attorney law states attorneys are the legal professionals holding the publicity. There are some cases that specify the professionals with the publicity such as the article 2 on Attorney law and Article 1.2 on Tax accountant law which establishes, “A tax accountant is the tax professional with the publicity.” Attorneys have their duties of realizing organization to protect human rights and do their legal tasks by delegation from the parties to the lawsuit or others. In this special quality, attorneys take the roles of the publicity and work as deputies. It is needed to guarantee attorneys’ performances with the publicity such as ①independence on the attorneys’ performances, ②freedom and restriction on delegation, ③regulation on fees, ④ disciplinary system, ⑤investigation of the delegated case by Legal Professional Conduct Council, etc.
(1) Article 2 on attorney law establishes and secures the independence from its phrase, “Attorneys do their duties independently and freely.” However, it does not define the independent subject in specific. The attorneys’ independence was important in the meaning of the independent from the national powers and the freedom against the governmental authorities. This concept also needs to be independent from the individual faith such as the clients and the attorneys’ own outlooks.
(2) The freedom on attorneys’ duties are commonly in trouble with its relation on the delegated cases. In principle, it is considered that whether attorneys delegate the cases from their clients or not as the freedom of the professionals. Nevertheless, they are charged not to refuse the offer wrongly and there are some cases that they should refuse to delegate. There might be some occasions to prohibit, restrict and receive the delegations in certain.
(3) The reason for occurring conflict on the attorneys’ fees is in relation to highly demand of attorneys’ fees. The critique that calls attorneys as the merchants is started for this reason. Thus, the bill of attorneys’ ethics states detailed regulations. The article 32 on the bill establishes, “attorneys cannot make a demand on fees in the boundary of its stipulation or without valid reasons.” (4) The disciplinary system of attorneys is the most enforceable measure to maintain the publicity on their duties. Their disciplinary actions should be taken from the independent institutions in advance rather than governmental organs. Furthermore, the disciplinary actions on attorneys should be implemented fairly and in moderate.
(5) The article 88 on attorney law establishes, “Legal Professional Conduct Council has purpose to erect legal ethics and to construct wholesome legal atmosphere.” Especially, the council was established to dispel national suspicions on granted the privileges of one’s former post and to recover the faith of the courts and the prosecutors’ offices by stamping out legal brokers.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 변호사 직무의 공공성의 근거
Ⅲ. 변호사 직무의 상인성에 대한 검토
Ⅳ. 변호사 직무의 공공성을 보장하기 위한 제도
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (35)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문과 연관된 판례 (4)
-
서울중앙지방법원 2007. 7. 18.자 2005라165 결정
자세히 보기 -
대법원 2008. 6. 26.자 2007마996 결정
법령에 의하여 상당한 정도로 그 영리추구 활동이 제한됨과 아울러 직무의 공공성이 요구되는 법무사의 활동은 상인의 영업활동과는 본질적인 차이가 있고, 법무사의 직무 관련 활동과 그로 인하여 형성된 법률관계에 대하여 상인의 영업활동 및 그로 인하여 형성된 법률관계와 동일하게 상법을 적용하지 않으면 안 될 특별한 사회·경제적 필요 내지 요청이 있
자세히 보기 -
대법원 2007. 7. 26.자 2006마334 결정
[1] 변호사의 영리추구 활동을 엄격히 제한하고 그 직무에 관하여 고도의 공공성과 윤리성을 강조하는 변호사법의 여러 규정에 비추어 보면, 위임인·위촉인과의 개별적 신뢰관계에 기초하여 개개 사건의 특성에 따라 전문적인 법률지식을 활용하여 소송에 관한 행위 및 행정처분의 청구에 관한 대리행위와 일반 법률사무를 수행하는 변호사의 활동은, 간이·신
자세히 보기 -
대법원 2009. 7. 9. 선고 2009다21249 판결
자세히 보기
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
관세사를 통한 관세소송 이행 방안에 관한 연구
관세학회지
2005 .02
-
미국법상 비닉권(祕匿權)과 변호사·의뢰인 간 의사교환의 보호
인권과 정의
2019 .01
-
[제2부] 대국민 사법서비스 개선방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2004 .12
-
중국 수사기관의 피의자 신문절차상 변호인 참여권 도입가능성 검토
법과 정책연구
2019 .01
-
Challenging Opportunities for Korean - American Attorneys
저스티스
1992 .07
-
한․중 FTA 체결에 따른세무대리서비스 시장의 변화와 대응방안 연구
무역연구
2015 .01
-
새로운 지식재산 사법제도의 구축
과학기술법연구
2009 .01
-
범죄피해자변호인의 역할과 국선피해자변호인제도
피해자학연구
2012 .01
-
변호사의 법적 지위와 변호사보수계약
법학연구
2010 .02
-
법학전문대학원의 현재적 문제와 미래적 과제
법과정책
2018 .01
-
Contingent fee, probability-of-winning, and equilibrium effort
한국산업경제학회 정기학술발표대회 초록집
2012 .11
-
변호사 법률의견서의 증거능력 : 대법원 2012. 5. 17. 2009도6788 판결을 중심으로
동아법학
2013 .02
-
법무실무를 위한 변호사의 법률정보 추구행태 탐구
정보관리학회지
2015 .01
-
Contingent-Fee in Litigation with Dependent Preferences
산업경제연구
2013 .04
-
전문변호사제도에 관한 연구
법학연구
2010 .02
-
변호사의 비밀유지의무
외법논집
2011 .01
-
자유주의 정치 기획의 반복, ‘정치 빈곤’의 자화상: 영화 <변호인>을 중심으로
민주사회와 정책연구
2014 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000498060