메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국외국어대학교 외국문학연구소 외국문학연구 외국문학연구 제21호
발행연도
2005.11
수록면
109 - 128 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In classical Greece, the impulse to express oneself goes along with the institution and establishment of democratic polis. Even though the invention and spread of the alphabets in the 1500, B. C. brought forth quite early the shift in Greek culture from the vocal to the literal, Greek education in writing begins in the era of the Periclean democracy. As Greek tragedy is made possible by the blooming of the critical intelligence and individuation of the self in the fifth and forth centuries, so writing or expressing oneself in Greece is based on the concept of the substantial and autonomous self reflecting Athenian democratic ideals.
An Athenian youth starts his writing education at the age of 7, at first copying letters on his waxen tableau and expanding this process to syllables, to words, and to short sentences. After this initial process of mastering alphabets and syllables, the youth learns the loci classici under the guidance of the grammatikos, the grammarian. This grammatikos means the teacher of literature, philologos and critic, critikos at the same time. At this stage, however, the grammarian does not teach critical thinking and analysis of the given literature to the student. After the grammarian comes the rhetorician. Under the rhetorician the student learns the preparatory writing exercises called progymnasmata. This preparatory writing exercise does not require of the student his innovative imagination and creativity. Rather it puts great emphasis on lucidity, simplicity, provability and vividness of style, including the description of the agent, action, time, place, cause and mode of the action in question. Chreia, which distinguishes itself from proverbs and maxims in that it is a kind of proverb with its speaker known, is often appropriated for this writing exercise. After this writing education, Greek sophists take hold of the Athenian ephebes of the age of eighteen years old. Under the sophists the student learns for three or four years the composition of his speeches. Hereby we can conclude that the final goal of Greek education in writing is the free composition of speeches. To the Greeks, writing and speech are coexistent, and therefore critical reading and textual analysis precede the composition of a speech. This fact demonstrates the delicate balance of the Greeks between the individualistic self-expression and the public-oriented speech.
Roman education in writing imitates at large the Greek one. As in Greece, so in Rome rhetoric is the final goal and consummation of education in writing. In Rome explanatory reading of a text, or praelectio is a prerequisite for the student's stylistic exercise. The student develops his own style in the process of transliteration from Greek into latin, or latin into Greek in reverse, and prose into verse and vice versa. What is characteristic with Roman education in writing is the introduction of legal knowledge into writing and composition of a speech. So at the summit of Roman writing education are the political and forensic compositions, that is suasoria and controversae. Both Greek and Roman education in writing aim at the habitually free ability of self-expression as the foundation of the civil society. As Quintilian says, writing makes us speak more precisely while speech makes possible writings much more easier.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-705-003608107