메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
서태원 (목원대학교)
저널정보
역사실학회 역사와실학 歷史와實學 第42輯
발행연도
2010.8
수록면
53 - 91 (39page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
According to the land survey registers of Chungju-gun under the Great Han Empire, there was a total of 16.069 gyeol of paddy fields and dry fields in the village of Gaheung with station. The total of dry fields was 11.137 gyeol which was about 69.3% of paddy fields and dry fields, and the rate was higher than Gaheung-meonwon and Chungju-gun. It was same to Yeoktos. And the land grade of the village of Gaheung with station was high. Especially the land grade of Yeoktos was much higher than the village of Gaheung with station's and Gaheung-meon's. Kim and Park played a leading role in the owner of land and tenant farmer of the village of Gaheung with station There were 82 houses with 6 toile-roofed houses and 76 thatcheded cottages in the village of Gaheung with station. The rate of the thatcheded cottages of 3 kan much higher than other thatcheded cottages. However the rate of the thatcheded cottages of 2 kan in the village of Gaheung with station. was lower than other village, because the traffic and commercial business in the villages of Gaheung with station was more better than other villages. And the japan's market and base facilities in the villages of Gaheung with station showed japan's imperialism. 50 houses were located Yeoktos which was about 69.3% of 82 houses in the villages of Gaheung with station .
There were 72 landlord in the villages of Gaheung with station. If we classify them by land ownership, a wealthy farmer was 20(about 27.8%) and a middle farmer was 7(about 9.7%) and a small farmer was 7(about 9.7%), and a poor farmer was 38(about 52.8%). But if we classify them by area under cultivation and land rented other, a wealthy farmer was 22(about 30.6%) and a middle farmer was 9(12.5%) and a small farmer was 6(about 8.3%), and a poor farmer was 35(about 48.6%). It showed that a wealthy farmer and a middle farmer were incresed but a small farmer and a poor farmer were decresed.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 가흥 역마을의 토지
Ⅲ. 가흥 역마을의 가옥
Ⅳ. 가흥 역마을 가주의 충주군 토지소유와 경작실태
Ⅴ. 맺음말
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (3)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-905-003647037