지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the background and meaning of progressively wide-spread practice of ‘using slave’s name as the household title’ (homy?ng) in the nineteenth century Korea. In the land registers (yang’an) in the Chos?n Dynasty (1392~1910), the practice of homy?ng was limited to the persons of higher occupation (chiky?k) on the household register (hoj?k). This suggests that the practice of homy?ng was directly related to one’s occupation.
For example, even toward the end of the nineteenth century, those with a higher occupation of yuhak (Confucian student) were allowed for the practice of homy?ng, while those with a lower occupation of kuny?k (military service)were not. This suggests that the occupational category of yuhak carried a practical value, contradictingprevious studies that have suggested otherwise.
In view of one’s occupation impacting even the practice of homy?ng, it can be inferred that it had multiple impacts on the everyday life of the people. Hence, there were multiple reasons why the people were so eager to have their occupation registered as yuhak on the household register. It can be surmised that the occupation of yuhak even in the late nineteenth century had been quite relevant to many aspects of everyday life other than the practice of homy?ng.
The practice of homy?ng on the household registers had been rather limited by the eighteenth century. However, the practice of homy?ng became wide-spread, and its rate of usage increased sharply by the mid-nineteenth century. An increasing number of the people came to use the names of domestic slaves as the titles of their households, suggesting changes in managing the household registration system. Moreover, the diseasedslaves rarely appear on the early eighteenth-century household registers, but it was not uncommon to register diseased slaves on the registers by the midand late nineteenth century. As a result, a majority of domestic slaves on the mid- and late nineteenth-century registers no longer existed in this world.
For example, even toward the end of the nineteenth century, those with a higher occupation of yuhak (Confucian student) were allowed for the practice of homy?ng, while those with a lower occupation of kuny?k (military service)were not. This suggests that the occupational category of yuhak carried a practical value, contradictingprevious studies that have suggested otherwise.
In view of one’s occupation impacting even the practice of homy?ng, it can be inferred that it had multiple impacts on the everyday life of the people. Hence, there were multiple reasons why the people were so eager to have their occupation registered as yuhak on the household register. It can be surmised that the occupation of yuhak even in the late nineteenth century had been quite relevant to many aspects of everyday life other than the practice of homy?ng.
The practice of homy?ng on the household registers had been rather limited by the eighteenth century. However, the practice of homy?ng became wide-spread, and its rate of usage increased sharply by the mid-nineteenth century. An increasing number of the people came to use the names of domestic slaves as the titles of their households, suggesting changes in managing the household registration system. Moreover, the diseasedslaves rarely appear on the early eighteenth-century household registers, but it was not uncommon to register diseased slaves on the registers by the midand late nineteenth century. As a result, a majority of domestic slaves on the mid- and late nineteenth-century registers no longer existed in this world.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 庚子量案의 호명 기재
Ⅲ. 18ㆍ19세기 家座冊의 호명 기재
Ⅳ. 호명사용 관행의 확산
Ⅴ. 호명의 호적등재
Ⅵ. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
조선후기 호적에 대한 이해 : 논쟁과 과제
한국사연구
2014 .06
-
일제시기 民籍簿의 작성과 女性戶主의 성격 ―19세기 濟州 戶籍中草, 光武戶籍과의 비교를 중심으로
대동문화연구
2007 .01
-
17·18세기 호적대장의 私奴婢 기재 실태 -경상도 단성현 권대유家 노비를 중심으로 -
古文書硏究
2004 .01
-
조선 후기 호적, 호구의 성격과 새로운 쟁점
한국사연구
2006 .12
-
조선왕조의 戶籍과 통치체계
동양사학연구
2015 .06
-
광무 연간 북한 지역 여성의 호적 기재 양상
역사민속학
2016 .12
-
19세기 조선 사회의 계층 이동 양상 –유학호와 비유학호의 비교를 중심으로
대동문화연구
2018 .01
-
18-19세기 노비 호구수 변화 양상에 대한 재검토 : 호적대장을 바라보는 새로운 시각
역사민속학
2017 .06
-
소송을 통해 본 17세기 노비횡탈 양상 : 해남윤씨가(海南尹氏家) 안심(安心)자녀 소송 문서를 중심으로
역사와현실
2013 .03
-
번역 텍스트의 언어 사용역(Register) 연구
번역학연구
2004 .03
-
戶籍과 族譜의 자료적 특성과 연구방법 ― 17C~20C 초 丹城地域 培養洞 陜川李氏들을 추적하며
대동문화연구
2018 .01
-
[논문] 19세기 유학층(幼學層)의 증가양상 -『단성호적대장』을 중심으로 -
역사와현실
2005 .03
-
19세기 戶籍大帳에서 보는 역촌 사람들의 存在樣態 ― 晉州 召村里를 중심으로
대동문화연구
2003 .01
-
시카타 히로시(四方 博)의 조선시대 ‘인구·가족’ 연구에 대한 재검토
한국사학보
2013 .08
-
現存 16·17세기 호적대장의 특징들과 新발견 1666년도‘濟州牧丙午式戶籍大帳’ 斷片
古文書硏究
2005 .01
-
[한국어 연구편] 현대국어 〈노인〉명칭의 분절구조 고찰 : 〈직업〉분절을 중심으로
한국학연구
2001 .07
-
Origins of British Interest in Korea in the Nineteenth Century
Korea Journal
1974 .05
-
고려시대 출생자(出生者)의 파악과 호적(戶籍)
역사와현실
2008 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-018339427