개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
According to the land survey registers of Chungju-gun under the Great Han Empire, there was a total of 30.533 gyeol of paddy fields and dry fields in the village of Yeonwon. The total of dry fields was 18.887 gyeol which was about 61.2% of paddy fields and dry fields, and the rate was higher than Bukbyeon-meonwon and Chungju-gun. Although the rate of paddy fields in the village of Yeonwon was similar to the villages of Gaheung and Donwol, it was different to the village of Yongan. It was same to Yeoktos. And the higher land grade of the village of Yeonwon was similar to the villages Gaheung and Yongan, but the land grade of village of Donwol was lower than other villages. But The villages of Yeonwon, Gaheung, Donwol and Yongan with station in Chungju-gun were similar to the high rate of Yeoktos of paddy fields and dry fields.
There were 88 houses with 3 tile-roofed houses and 85 thatched cottages in the village of Yeonwon. A tile-roofed house with 30 kan was building of the station of Yeonwon until 1895. The rate of the thatched cottages of 2 kan and 3 kan in the villages of Yeonwon, Donwol and Yongan was much higher than other thatched cottages. However the rate of the thatched cottages of 2 kan in the village of Gaheung was lower than other village, because the traffic and commercial business in the village of Gaheung was more better than other villages. And the japan's market and base facilities in the village of Gaheung showed japan's imperialism. But the villages of Yeonwon, Gaheung, Donwol and Yongan in Chungju-gun were similar to the high rate of house close connection with station.
There were 85 farmers in the villages of Yeonwon. If we classify them by land ownership. a wealthy farmer was 10(about 24.1%) and a middle farmer was 13(about 24.1%) and a small farmer was 8(about 14.8%). and a poor farmer was 24(about 42.5%). But if we classify them by area under cultivation and land rented other. a wealthy farmer was 10(24.1%)→24(about 44.5%) and a middle farmer was 13(24.1%)→12(about 22.2%) and a small farmer was 8(about 14.8%)→ 10(about 18.5%), and a poor farmer was 24(about 42.5%)→8(about 14.5%). It showed that a wealthy farmer was much increased and a poor farmer was much decreased. And it was same to the villages of Gaheung, Donwol and Yongan. But there were 31 tenant farmer without land ownership in the village of Yeonwon. They were mostly poor. because the profit of tenant land was half that of their own land and the size of tenant land was small. It was same to other villages. Especially the most tenant farmers who lived the thatched cottages of 2 kan was in destitution.
There were 88 houses with 3 tile-roofed houses and 85 thatched cottages in the village of Yeonwon. A tile-roofed house with 30 kan was building of the station of Yeonwon until 1895. The rate of the thatched cottages of 2 kan and 3 kan in the villages of Yeonwon, Donwol and Yongan was much higher than other thatched cottages. However the rate of the thatched cottages of 2 kan in the village of Gaheung was lower than other village, because the traffic and commercial business in the village of Gaheung was more better than other villages. And the japan's market and base facilities in the village of Gaheung showed japan's imperialism. But the villages of Yeonwon, Gaheung, Donwol and Yongan in Chungju-gun were similar to the high rate of house close connection with station.
There were 85 farmers in the villages of Yeonwon. If we classify them by land ownership. a wealthy farmer was 10(about 24.1%) and a middle farmer was 13(about 24.1%) and a small farmer was 8(about 14.8%). and a poor farmer was 24(about 42.5%). But if we classify them by area under cultivation and land rented other. a wealthy farmer was 10(24.1%)→24(about 44.5%) and a middle farmer was 13(24.1%)→12(about 22.2%) and a small farmer was 8(about 14.8%)→ 10(about 18.5%), and a poor farmer was 24(about 42.5%)→8(about 14.5%). It showed that a wealthy farmer was much increased and a poor farmer was much decreased. And it was same to the villages of Gaheung, Donwol and Yongan. But there were 31 tenant farmer without land ownership in the village of Yeonwon. They were mostly poor. because the profit of tenant land was half that of their own land and the size of tenant land was small. It was same to other villages. Especially the most tenant farmers who lived the thatched cottages of 2 kan was in destitution.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 연원마을 전답의 면적과 등급
Ⅲ. 연원마을의 가옥
Ⅳ. 연원마을 주민의 토지소유와 경작형태
Ⅴ. 맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (31)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
대한제국기 충주군 양안을 통해서 본 가흥 역마을
역사와실학
2010 .08
-
대한제국기 김가진의 충주지역 토지 소유와 의의
한국독립운동사연구
2017 .05
-
충주 豊德 마을의 모습과 농민층의 토지소유 : 전주이씨 진안대군파 동족마을 사례
역사와실학
2010 .08
-
대한제국기 신설 宮의 지주 경영
역사교육
2009 .03
-
대한제국기 충주의 사원전과 사하촌
역사와실학
2010 .08
-
19세기 조선과 베트남의 토지개혁론에 대한 비교사적 검토 : 토지소유를 둘러싼 제도와 관습의 차이를 중심으로
역사학보
2010 .06
-
경남 창원지역 토지조사의 시행과정과 장부체계의 변화
역사와현실
2007 .09
-
자소작농 김영배, ‘미친 생각’이 뱃속에서 나온다
역사비평
2009 .05
-
高麗後期 農地改墾과 新生村
역사와 담론
2003 .04
-
조선후기 경상도 지역 양반층의 토지소유규모와 지가의 변동
역사와경계
2010 .12
-
농지개혁기 울주군 상북면 농지위원회의 구성과 활동
역사와 세계
2008 .06
-
These People in This Land
Korea Journal
1971 .07
-
한말 일제초기 공토 정책과 국유민유 분쟁
한국민족문화
2012 .11
-
중국의 도시화와 공공토지 사유화
역사비평
2016 .08
-
17세기 후반 『남해현용동궁양안』을 통해서 본 갑술양안의 성격
역사와경계
2011 .12
-
20세기 후반 고려 전시과 연구의 定礎 : 《高麗土地制度史硏究》를 통해본 강진철의 연구 성과와 의의
한국사연구
2009 .06
-
대한제국기 충주 영일 정씨가의 토지소유와 지주경영
한국사연구
2015 .06
-
공공성의 관점에서 본 한국 토지보유세의 역사와 의미
역사비평
2011 .02
-
秦˙漢의 土地所有制
중국사연구
2010 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0