지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Leniency programs give immunity from fines to cartel firms which report to the antitrust authorities about their illegal activities. To detect and deter cartels, many antitrust authorities have adopted antitrust policies called leniency programs. Since one characteristic of cartel activity is secrecy. it is difficult to collect evidence of illegal cartel activities such as price-fixing. In order for antitrust authorities to cope with the secrecy and prosecute cartels, leniency programs grant reduction in or exemption from sanctions for firms which report their illegal antitrust activity to the antitrust authorities before they are detected.
Our country as participating in regulation for the international cartel positively must improve a leniency program for the strong regulation of the international cartel. I am going to easily show a system improvement idea.
The first, the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act(the Fair Trading Act) accepts leniency only for oneself filer of the first and the second, it may be said that this is a policy to raise the motive of the independence report for the law violation as the system that is near to an American one. However, what improve such a system like Japan is desirable and is seen to collect evidence for the violation of law fact more easily from a law violator.
The second, a legislation intercepting the danger that the information such as the report documents which submitted to the Fair Trade Commission of our country for the leniency program to activate by American evidence start procedure(discovery) is necessary.
The third, the Fair Trading Act associate with a leniency program and prescribe so-called additional reduction(Amnesty Plus) system. The introduction of the additional weighting(Penalty Plus) system is necessary for improve the functioning substantially to discover the international cartel.
The forth, the introduction of so called a marker system is demanded of our country. The marker system to introduce must be prescribed so that it is applied to only a first filer.
The fifth, when the cartel doer has the fear of the indictment, the effectiveness of leniency system are lost possibility. It is desirable to prescribe a criminal charge exemption in the Fair Trading Act.
The sixth, it is necessary to put the limit of the period leniency program to file after an investigation start in the Fair Trading Act.
Our country as participating in regulation for the international cartel positively must improve a leniency program for the strong regulation of the international cartel. I am going to easily show a system improvement idea.
The first, the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act(the Fair Trading Act) accepts leniency only for oneself filer of the first and the second, it may be said that this is a policy to raise the motive of the independence report for the law violation as the system that is near to an American one. However, what improve such a system like Japan is desirable and is seen to collect evidence for the violation of law fact more easily from a law violator.
The second, a legislation intercepting the danger that the information such as the report documents which submitted to the Fair Trade Commission of our country for the leniency program to activate by American evidence start procedure(discovery) is necessary.
The third, the Fair Trading Act associate with a leniency program and prescribe so-called additional reduction(Amnesty Plus) system. The introduction of the additional weighting(Penalty Plus) system is necessary for improve the functioning substantially to discover the international cartel.
The forth, the introduction of so called a marker system is demanded of our country. The marker system to introduce must be prescribed so that it is applied to only a first filer.
The fifth, when the cartel doer has the fear of the indictment, the effectiveness of leniency system are lost possibility. It is desirable to prescribe a criminal charge exemption in the Fair Trading Act.
The sixth, it is necessary to put the limit of the period leniency program to file after an investigation start in the Fair Trading Act.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 공정거래법상 리니언시제도
Ⅲ. 외국의 리니언시제도
Ⅳ. 결론
參考文獻
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (55)
참고문헌 신청
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김두진 / 2007 / 토론문: 공정거래법상 Leniency Program의 최적 활용조건 / 경쟁법연구 16
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김성훈 / 2009 / 부당한 공동행위에 대한 과징금의 검토 / 경쟁법연구 20 : 358 ~ 391
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 南雅晴 / 2002 / カルテルと制裁に関するOECD報告書 / 国際商事法務 30 (8)
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 稲熊克紀 / 2005 / 改正独占禁止法の解説 / 建設マネジメント技術
6. [기타자료] - / / 米国 ＥＵにおける最近の競争法の運用状況について(独禁懇 178-2)
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김성훈 / 2009 / 부당한 공동행위에 대한 과징금의 검토 / 경쟁법연구 20 : 358 ~ 391
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 南雅晴 / 2002 / カルテルと制裁に関するOECD報告書 / 国際商事法務 30 (8)
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 稲熊克紀 / 2005 / 改正独占禁止法の解説 / 建設マネジメント技術
6. [기타자료] - / / 米国 ＥＵにおける最近の競争法の運用状況について(独禁懇 178-2)
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
부당공동행위의 적발유인제도 ― 자진신고자 감면제도를 중심으로 ―
경영법률
2009 .01
-
카르텔 자진신고자 감면제도의 주요 쟁점과 효과 분석
응용경제
2010 .01
-
자진신고자 감면제도하의 담합 적발률 추정과 담합분석모형 개발
한국경영과학회 학술대회논문집
2013 .05
-
리니언시제도의 합리적 운용 방안에 관한 연구 - 보험회사를 중심으로 -
보험법연구
2020 .01
-
자진신고 제도의 주요 쟁점과 정책적 시사점
저스티스
2018 .06
-
공정거래법상 자진신고 감면제도에 관한 법적 소고
법과 정책연구
2018 .01
-
자진신고자 감면제도의 개정이 담합 적발률과 담합 형성률에 미치는 영향
한국경제연구
2014 .06
-
카르텔 규제의 형사적 집행 효과에 관한 의문들: 공정거래법 전면개편안의 전속 고발권 폐지 관련 내용을 중심으로
고려법학
2019 .01
-
부당한 공동행위의 성립 : 사례연구
서강법학
2008 .06
-
중국 반독점법상 카르텔 규제의 쟁점과 사례 분석
중국과 중국학
2013 .02
-
공정거래법상 수직적 공동행위의 규제에 관한 연구
경영법률
2011 .01
-
Earnings Management in Price Cartel Firms and the Case of Distribution Industry
유통과학연구
2019 .01
-
담합의 자진신고자에 대한 손해배상책임의 경감
비교사법
2016 .08
-
中国式的辩诉交易:认罪认罚从宽制度
동북아법연구
2017 .01
-
국제카르텔과 독점규제법
기업법연구
2005 .03
-
경쟁법상 부당한 공동행위의 형사처벌에 따르는 법리적 쟁점
경쟁법연구
2019 .01
-
카르텔 억지 및 피해자의 효과적 구제를 위한 독점규제법의 사적 집행 방안
행정법연구
2012 .12
-
담합행위에 대한 형사법적 대응방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2011 .12
-
국제카르텔에 대한 독점규제법의 역외적용 : 대상판결 : 대법원 2006. 3. 23. 선고 2003두11124 판결
기업법연구
2006 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-366-002432151