지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Korea’s bus transportation has been growing as an increase in the population led to an increase in need of transportation supply: the number of operating buses and the number of lines have been increasing continuously. Today, Korea’s Bus Transportation Business is divided into seven categories (cities, farming and fishing villages, cross-county, shuttles, chartered, and etc.) and operated separately. However, Bus Transportation Business is facing difficulties due to the expansions of subways and taxis, as well as the increasing number of private vehicles.
In the beginning, bus transportations were privately operated in Korea, however, due to the problems caused by small-scale businesses’ low-level service and profitability-based bus lines, it has been decided to manage bus transportation publicly in certain sectors. Yet, fundamental limits hindered the bus transportation from operating publicly. Thus, most of the bus transportation system is under private ownerships. As stated above, private ownership resulted in constant deficit operation, which caused low-service quality. Furthermore, poor working conditions led to serious conflicts between labor and management.
As a countermove, semi-public bus transportation system should be introduced. But, semi-public system cannot be a total solution for every problem because from the cities that already introduced public transportation system, we know that there are possible problems that could be caused. Despite this fact, we have to admit that public ownership of bus transportation is an easier way to stabilize current chaos in bus transportation business. It is because users, or bus transportation companies, cannot afford any more investment, and workers cannot involve in management either. Whereas financial support from the third party is in need, there’s no alternative plan. In the case of Korea, financial support from the third party basically means depending on central or local government. Therefore, introducing public bus transportation system is easily discussed to improve the management of bus transportation.
However, for a successful operation of semi-public ownership of bus transportation, we cannot deny the importance of securing financial funds. Then, it might be a way for local governments with a low financial standing to find a solution from other than semi-public ownership of bus transportation. The reason is that the efficiency report on semi-public ownership of bus transportation proves that even some local governments with a good financial standing such as Dae-Jun reconsider to publicize bus transportation system, due to the increase in financial support on bus transportation system. This means that it might be difficult for the increase in local governments’ financial profit to catch up with the increase in the size of financial support for bus transportation system.
Considering the problems that could be caused by semi-public ownership of bus transportation system, it is necessary for local governments with a low financial standing to examine other bus transportation management systems such as new lines, non-profit lines, returning lines, and lines bidding system. We should not forget that such public-private joint systems as profit joint control system and lines bidding system are implemented and used in all over the world (this means such bus management systems could be reconsidered as an alternative plan).
Lastly, the constitution and legal provisions should be adequately reviewed for the improvement of bus transportation companies’ rational management.
In the beginning, bus transportations were privately operated in Korea, however, due to the problems caused by small-scale businesses’ low-level service and profitability-based bus lines, it has been decided to manage bus transportation publicly in certain sectors. Yet, fundamental limits hindered the bus transportation from operating publicly. Thus, most of the bus transportation system is under private ownerships. As stated above, private ownership resulted in constant deficit operation, which caused low-service quality. Furthermore, poor working conditions led to serious conflicts between labor and management.
As a countermove, semi-public bus transportation system should be introduced. But, semi-public system cannot be a total solution for every problem because from the cities that already introduced public transportation system, we know that there are possible problems that could be caused. Despite this fact, we have to admit that public ownership of bus transportation is an easier way to stabilize current chaos in bus transportation business. It is because users, or bus transportation companies, cannot afford any more investment, and workers cannot involve in management either. Whereas financial support from the third party is in need, there’s no alternative plan. In the case of Korea, financial support from the third party basically means depending on central or local government. Therefore, introducing public bus transportation system is easily discussed to improve the management of bus transportation.
However, for a successful operation of semi-public ownership of bus transportation, we cannot deny the importance of securing financial funds. Then, it might be a way for local governments with a low financial standing to find a solution from other than semi-public ownership of bus transportation. The reason is that the efficiency report on semi-public ownership of bus transportation proves that even some local governments with a good financial standing such as Dae-Jun reconsider to publicize bus transportation system, due to the increase in financial support on bus transportation system. This means that it might be difficult for the increase in local governments’ financial profit to catch up with the increase in the size of financial support for bus transportation system.
Considering the problems that could be caused by semi-public ownership of bus transportation system, it is necessary for local governments with a low financial standing to examine other bus transportation management systems such as new lines, non-profit lines, returning lines, and lines bidding system. We should not forget that such public-private joint systems as profit joint control system and lines bidding system are implemented and used in all over the world (this means such bus management systems could be reconsidered as an alternative plan).
Lastly, the constitution and legal provisions should be adequately reviewed for the improvement of bus transportation companies’ rational management.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
Ⅱ. 버스운수업 운영 제도
Ⅲ. 운영제도의 문제점과 개선방안
Ⅳ. 결론
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (12)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
대구 시내버스 준공영제 개선방안에 관한 연구
지역사회연구
2010 .06
-
수도권 광역교통행정기구 설립 기본구상
정책연구
2017 .09
-
수도권 전기버스 도입 확대 방안 연구
정책연구
2018 .11
-
우리는 BUS를 타고 SCHOOL에 간다
초등우리교육
2000 .06
-
BI Network
벤처다이제스트
2007 .01
-
보육시설 통학버스 안전운행개선방안에 관한 연구
유아교육·보육복지연구
2008 .01
-
준공영제 등 시내버스체계 개편의 과정과 성과 평가 : 대전광역시 사례
도시행정학보
2008 .12
-
버스準公營制에서의 運送費用과 運送收入金의 法的 性質
지방자치법연구
2009 .01
-
수도권 수요대응형 버스서비스 도입방안 연구 : eBUS사례를 중심으로
정책연구
2011 .10
-
경기도 주요 버스정책 평가 및 발전방안 : 광역버스 및 맞춤형버스를 중심으로
정책연구
2018 .12
-
경기심야버스 운행체계 효율화 방안
정책연구
2019 .08
-
경기도 심야버스 운행체계 개선방안 연구
정책연구
2015 .11
-
컨테이너 육상운송기업의 협력사 인간관계가기업운영에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증연구: 하청운송업체를 중심으로
무역연구
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
준공영제 등 시내버스체계 개편의 과정과 성과 평가 : 대전광역시 사례
이시철
,
유세종
도시행정학보
2008
.12
마을버스 운영개선 방안 연구
송제룡
,
백승민
,
좌승희
경기연구원 기본연구
2006
.11
버스준공영제 평가 방법 및 지표 개발에 관한 연구
김정모
,
권성대
,
박성용
외 3명
대한토목학회 학술대회
2012
.10
버스준공영제 시행에 따른 대도시 시내버스 노선의 효율성 분석 : 광주광역시 사례를 중심으로
이창호
,
나주몽
한국지역개발학회지
2016
.12
1960년대 이후 도시기본계획이 서울 도시공간구조 변화에 미친 영향 : ‘다핵도심구상’의 실천을 중심으로
서여림
,
김기호
한국도시설계학회지 도시설계
2016
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-336-002867821