지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2008.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 2 (472page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In recent years, many people have been concerned about Korean's juvenile justice system. In response to criticism of the juvenile justice system in the 1990's and its ability to effectively reduce recidivism of young offenders, the government drafted a new revised bill on current Juvenile Law. This new bill revised to deal with young offenders who are 10 to 19 has been in force as of June 22, 2008. The new revised Juvenile Law introduces significant reforms that address the weaknesses and the problems in the youth justice system. One of the most important reforms concerns with the provision of "recommendation toward reconciliation(§25-3)" in order to permit the greater use be made of alternative responses outside the youth court process. Although the new revised Juvenile Law has not explicitly mentioned the notion of "restorative justice(RJ)", it is reflected in the recognition of restorative justice, through the provision of "recommendation toward reconciliation" functions as the legislative framework for restorative justice practice. In sum, new revised Juvenile Law does seem to open the door to the development of initiatives generally associated with restorative justice in Korea.
Restorative justice(RJ) represents a new paradigm, a new way of looking at crime and reacting to it. RJ can be defined as a process whereby all parties with a stake in a specific offence, including the offender, the victim and their supports(mostly families), collectively resolve how to deal with the aftermath of the offence and its consequences for the future. It is a way of addressing the needs of victims, offenders and communities by focusing on the settlement of the conflicts arising from crime and dealing with the underlying problems which cause it.
The force of a revised Bill provides a new opportunity to examine the particular environment resulting from this legislation and to reflect on its directions. Our first task will be to situate the restorative justice practices in the context of formal juvenile justice system. Next, we shall identify the practical issues of RJ in the process of juvenile justice, and focus on the what is at stake and the opportunities provides by this new legal framework. Finally, we shall explore the change be taken to step forward for the RJ values and principles.
This project was planned to run for three year(2006-2008), in order to establish "Korean FC Model" as part to RJ practices as an alternative or diversionary process for addressing young offence including school bullying, and to elaborate the guidelines and training manual for RJ practitioners which provide the good practices within the context of broader youth justice system. The main focus of the 2008 project is to assess the effect of RJ practices through the comparative study designed by two groups of participants divided into FC proceeding and the youth court process.
This paper consists of three sections. The first provides a comprehensive overview of most recent "Juvenile Justice Reform" and research assessment about "restorative justice practices and programs" in western countries that supports the diversionary referral system or extra-judicial measures as a effective means to reduce recidivism among offenders.
The second explores the "Family Conferencing(FC) Experiment", in order to identify restorative justice practices as an alternative or diversionary process at the juvenile court-stage for addressing Juvenile offence. Results from responses of FC participants campared to those of the court groups hold positive views of restorative justice; the outcomes of FC process to be significantly fairer than those of court proceedings. The main results of this research support the importance of "humanistic mediation principles and multi-method approach" for good RJ practices, and demonstrate the issues of FC practices as a effective measure and work best for young offence from the findings on a experimental study in 2008.
Based on the research findings, the third suggests the recommendations to change into "good RJ practices" to improve the best treatment possible from the Juvenile justice system in terms of the institutionalization of RJ into the formal juvenile justice system.
Restorative justice(RJ) represents a new paradigm, a new way of looking at crime and reacting to it. RJ can be defined as a process whereby all parties with a stake in a specific offence, including the offender, the victim and their supports(mostly families), collectively resolve how to deal with the aftermath of the offence and its consequences for the future. It is a way of addressing the needs of victims, offenders and communities by focusing on the settlement of the conflicts arising from crime and dealing with the underlying problems which cause it.
The force of a revised Bill provides a new opportunity to examine the particular environment resulting from this legislation and to reflect on its directions. Our first task will be to situate the restorative justice practices in the context of formal juvenile justice system. Next, we shall identify the practical issues of RJ in the process of juvenile justice, and focus on the what is at stake and the opportunities provides by this new legal framework. Finally, we shall explore the change be taken to step forward for the RJ values and principles.
This project was planned to run for three year(2006-2008), in order to establish "Korean FC Model" as part to RJ practices as an alternative or diversionary process for addressing young offence including school bullying, and to elaborate the guidelines and training manual for RJ practitioners which provide the good practices within the context of broader youth justice system. The main focus of the 2008 project is to assess the effect of RJ practices through the comparative study designed by two groups of participants divided into FC proceeding and the youth court process.
This paper consists of three sections. The first provides a comprehensive overview of most recent "Juvenile Justice Reform" and research assessment about "restorative justice practices and programs" in western countries that supports the diversionary referral system or extra-judicial measures as a effective means to reduce recidivism among offenders.
The second explores the "Family Conferencing(FC) Experiment", in order to identify restorative justice practices as an alternative or diversionary process at the juvenile court-stage for addressing Juvenile offence. Results from responses of FC participants campared to those of the court groups hold positive views of restorative justice; the outcomes of FC process to be significantly fairer than those of court proceedings. The main results of this research support the importance of "humanistic mediation principles and multi-method approach" for good RJ practices, and demonstrate the issues of FC practices as a effective measure and work best for young offence from the findings on a experimental study in 2008.
Based on the research findings, the third suggests the recommendations to change into "good RJ practices" to improve the best treatment possible from the Juvenile justice system in terms of the institutionalization of RJ into the formal juvenile justice system.
목차
국문요약
제1장 서론
제2장 이론적 배경
제3장 회복적 사법 실천모델에 대한 실험연구의 설계
제4장 회복적 사법실천 사례분석 - 법원단계 “화해권고”를 중심으로 -
제5장 회복적 사법 프로그램의 실효성 평가
제6장 논의 및 정책제언
참고문헌
Abstract
부록
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
소년사법과 회복적 사법
피해자학연구
2009 .01
-
회복적 사법의 이념 구현을 위한 경찰의 경미소년사건처리
경찰학연구
2011 .03
-
한국의 回復的 少年司法에 관한 연구
비교형사법연구
2008 .01
-
회복적 사법의 도입방안에 관한 연구 : 캐나다 경찰의 비사법 처분을 중심으로
형사정책연구
2006 .03
-
개정소년법의 주요쟁점에 관한 검토
강원법학
2007 .12
-
한국의 개정 소년법의 주요내용과 동향
비교형사법연구
2008 .01
-
새로운 다이버전으로서 회복적 사법의 실제와 그 효과 : 경찰단계 가족회합 실험연구 결과를 중심으로
형사정책연구
2008 .06
-
소년사건 처리절차에 관한 고찰
한양법학
2012 .11
-
소년범죄자에 대한 경찰단계의 비범죄화 정책제안 : 경찰의 전문가 참여제와 회복적 공동체사법(Restorative Community Justice)
형사정책연구
2004 .09
-
회복적 사법 실천모델의 효과성 연구 : 공식소년절차 참여집단과 ‘대화모임’ 참여집단 간의 비교연구를 중심으로
형사정책연구
2009 .09
-
21세기 소년사법 개혁과 회복적 사법의 가치
형사정책연구
2007 .09
-
회복적 사법과 우리나라의 형사제재체계
형사법연구
2007 .01
-
가정폭력 사건에 대한 새로운 접근 : 유럽의 회복적 정의 실천을 중심으로
국제학논총
2017 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
한국의 형사조정 : 회복적사법 프로그램인가?
김용욱
형사정책연구
2008
.06
21세기 소년사법 개혁의 방향과 과제(Ⅰ) : 제Ⅰ부 청소년비행 및 소년사법정책 현황분석
김은경
,
김지선
,
이승현
외 3명
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2007
.12
21세기 소년사법 개혁과 회복적 사법의 가치
김은경
형사정책연구
2007
.09
새로운 다이버전으로서 회복적 사법의 실제와 그 효과 : 경찰단계 가족회합 실험연구 결과를 중심으로
김은경
형사정책연구
2008
.06
이야기모델을 적용한 배심원들의 판단결정과정의 검증연구
김은영
형사정책연구
2013
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-364-002071190