지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Currently Korean juvenile justice systems are managed and processed by the prosecutors and juvenile courts. Therefore, most juvenile offenders have to go through formal prosecution and judicial processes in the courts even though they had committed misdemeanors. This complex and long juvenile justice procedures may cause the negative ‘labeling effects’ and could reduce the opportunities of juvenile offenders to be reintegrated into the members of sound society. Thus, the current juvenile justice systems may contribute on the increases of recidivism.
With relation to the juvenile justice system, several other countries already have taken the philosophy of restorative justice to reduce the negative labeling effects. Especially, they have considered the usages of police discretion as the measures to implement restorative justice because the police stage is the initiation of the formal juvenile justice system.
This study focuses on the introduction of the Canadian Extrajudicial Measures as an example of the restorative juvenile justice policy in the stage of police. Based on the examination of Canadian system, this study proposes the several recommendations.
First, the development of Korean style of restorative juvenile justice system by the implementation of restorative justice in the actual processes.
Second, allowing of police discretion in the juvenile justice procedures. For the implementation of police extrajudicial measures, the police should have the authority of investigation on crimes and the authority to close the investigation.
Third, from the legislative point of view, the current policy of “deferred indictment conditioned on judicious guidance” should be abolished because there is no proper legal basis for that policy. Instead, the extrajudicial measures should be allowed to both prosecutors and the police.
Forth, the establishment of the standard to decide which offenses should be dealt with extrajudicial measures. Additionally, the legal basis and the internal control procedure should be prepared for the implementation of this measure.
With relation to the juvenile justice system, several other countries already have taken the philosophy of restorative justice to reduce the negative labeling effects. Especially, they have considered the usages of police discretion as the measures to implement restorative justice because the police stage is the initiation of the formal juvenile justice system.
This study focuses on the introduction of the Canadian Extrajudicial Measures as an example of the restorative juvenile justice policy in the stage of police. Based on the examination of Canadian system, this study proposes the several recommendations.
First, the development of Korean style of restorative juvenile justice system by the implementation of restorative justice in the actual processes.
Second, allowing of police discretion in the juvenile justice procedures. For the implementation of police extrajudicial measures, the police should have the authority of investigation on crimes and the authority to close the investigation.
Third, from the legislative point of view, the current policy of “deferred indictment conditioned on judicious guidance” should be abolished because there is no proper legal basis for that policy. Instead, the extrajudicial measures should be allowed to both prosecutors and the police.
Forth, the establishment of the standard to decide which offenses should be dealt with extrajudicial measures. Additionally, the legal basis and the internal control procedure should be prepared for the implementation of this measure.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 캐나다 경찰의 사례
Ⅳ. 우리나라에의 도입방안
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국의 回復的 少年司法에 관한 연구
비교형사법연구
2008 .01
-
소년사건 처리절차에 관한 고찰
한양법학
2012 .11
-
회복적 사법의 이념 구현을 위한 경찰의 경미소년사건처리
경찰학연구
2011 .03
-
소년사법과 회복적 사법
피해자학연구
2009 .01
-
한국의 개정 소년법의 주요내용과 동향
비교형사법연구
2008 .01
-
소년사법에서 회복적 사법의 운영모델 - 경찰과 검찰단계를 중심으로 -
법학논집
2010 .01
-
개정소년법의 주요쟁점에 관한 검토
강원법학
2007 .12
-
[21세기 소년사법개혁의 방향과 과제(Ⅱ)] 회복적 소년사법 실천모델의 효과성 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2008 .12
-
소년범죄자에 대한 경찰단계의 비범죄화 정책제안 : 경찰의 전문가 참여제와 회복적 공동체사법(Restorative Community Justice)
형사정책연구
2004 .09
-
21세기 소년사법 개혁과 회복적 사법의 가치
형사정책연구
2007 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-364-003968538