지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
King Ch'ngs?n had been aware of the seriousness of the abuses of the illegal seizure of slaves since his days as Crown Prince. In this regard, he exhibited a willingness to resolve the issues associated with slavery during both his tenureas acting regent and during the early portion of his rule. His confiscation of illegally seized slaves from the so-called 'four classes of slaves (sag?n nobi)' can be seen as having been motivated not only by his desire to put an end to the evil practices associated with the seizure of slaves. but also as politically motivated steps designed to weaken the power of the close associates of the previous king. However, the limits of the steps taken by King Ch'ngs?n are clearly evidenced by the fact that his own close associates were actively engaged in such practices.
A campaign to confiscate individuals who belonged to the four classes of slaves was once again implemented during the fourth year of King Ch'nghye. The rationale behind the confiscating of these slaves was identical to that which had motivated a similar move during the reign of King Ch'ngs?n, with the degree of damage incurred based on the extent of the slaveholders' relationship with those in charge of the implementation of this campaign. The confiscation of individuals falling under these four categories of slaves was closely related to the retrieval and reversion of kongsinj?n (merit-subject land). However, the fact that King Ch'nghye was sent into exile by the Yuan dynasty of China after a mere few months on the throne ensured that his actions taken in this regard were limited interms of their efficiency and consistency. A comparable situation occurred during the early period of the reign of King Ch'ngsuk, when King Ch'ngs?n, despite his status as abdicated king, continued to exercise a powerful political influence.
The class of people known as kisang nobi (slaves presented as bribes), which constituted one of the above-mentioned four classes of slaves, came into being as a result of the search for methods to increase the number of slaves which could be offered to the powers that be as a bribe. This type of slave was generally forcefully seized or acquired by those in power. However, during the reform process, ownership of these slaves was reverted to the royal Buddhisttemple or royal treasury, where they could be used as the private property of the royal family, rather than to their original owners or government organizations. This type of situation makes clear the twisted manner in which the slavery system was managed.
The slaves granted by the previous king to his meritorious subjects or close associates represented the economic basis upon which the latter maintained their power. However, these slaves were subsequently confiscated in accordance with the prevailing political dynamics. More often than not, these slaves were confiscated and then granted to new officials.
T'sok nobi (entrusted slaves) were individuals who voluntarily offered themselves as slaves to the powers that be or to the large-scale landlords that developed during late Kory?. However, while the slaves obtained through this t'sok system appeared on the surface to have been seized through legal means. there is much reason to believe that such individuals werein fact forcefully turned into slaves by the powers that be. This assertion is supported by the fact that this type of slave also became the subject of confiscation on the part of the state during the above-mentioned reforms. In this regard, the fact that the insang muy?k nobi (slaves obtained through personal transactions) were, like the t'sok nobi, made the object of confiscation only serves to further heighten the possibility that this type of slave was also initially seized through illegal means.
These four classes of slaves (sag?n nobi) were regarded as being separate from the cho?p nobi, or private slaves inherited from one's ancestors. However, the marked increase in the number of slaves resulting from the practices of amnyang wich'?n (壓良爲賤, degradation of a commoner to slave or lowborn class) and sap'e (賜牌, deeds to land and slaves granted by the king) raises the possibility that some cho?p nobi were in fact included within the four classes of slaves as either t'sok nobi or kisang nobi. These cbo?p nobi in all likelihood were included amongst these four classes of slaves (sag?n nobi) either as part of indirect efforts to curry the favor of those in power, or of direct subjugation to the latter. Furthermore, the increase of slaves granted to meritorious subjects andof the kisang nobi offered to those in power led to a decrease of oegwan nobi (public slaves). Therefore, the emergence of these four classes of slaves (sag?n nobi) in many ways clearly illustrates the serious problems which plagued the management of the slave system during this particular period.
Several institutional mechanisms were put in place to overcome the evil practices associated with the slave system. These included the establishment of the Panggo gamj?n py?lgam (房庫監傳別監, Office of Land and Slave Property Documents), Ch'lli py?nj?ng togam (察理辨整都監, Directorate for the Return of Illegally Seized Slaves to the Original Ownership), and Ch?nmin py?nj?ng togam (田民辨整都監, Directorate for Reclassification of Farmland and the Farming Population). However, the emergence of a host of pressing issues during the final period of Kory? such as the restoration of the king to the throne. conflicts between the various political factions, and the deterioration of relations with Yuan, all but ensured that the reforms failed to achieve the desired results. Furthermore, the ability to maintain aconsistent slave policy was further hindered by the fact that the main actors behind these reformseffectively switched places with the initial targets of these reforms: and by the fundamental contradiction that saw the king andother members of the royal family become the recipients of the slaves that had been confiscated.
A campaign to confiscate individuals who belonged to the four classes of slaves was once again implemented during the fourth year of King Ch'nghye. The rationale behind the confiscating of these slaves was identical to that which had motivated a similar move during the reign of King Ch'ngs?n, with the degree of damage incurred based on the extent of the slaveholders' relationship with those in charge of the implementation of this campaign. The confiscation of individuals falling under these four categories of slaves was closely related to the retrieval and reversion of kongsinj?n (merit-subject land). However, the fact that King Ch'nghye was sent into exile by the Yuan dynasty of China after a mere few months on the throne ensured that his actions taken in this regard were limited interms of their efficiency and consistency. A comparable situation occurred during the early period of the reign of King Ch'ngsuk, when King Ch'ngs?n, despite his status as abdicated king, continued to exercise a powerful political influence.
The class of people known as kisang nobi (slaves presented as bribes), which constituted one of the above-mentioned four classes of slaves, came into being as a result of the search for methods to increase the number of slaves which could be offered to the powers that be as a bribe. This type of slave was generally forcefully seized or acquired by those in power. However, during the reform process, ownership of these slaves was reverted to the royal Buddhisttemple or royal treasury, where they could be used as the private property of the royal family, rather than to their original owners or government organizations. This type of situation makes clear the twisted manner in which the slavery system was managed.
The slaves granted by the previous king to his meritorious subjects or close associates represented the economic basis upon which the latter maintained their power. However, these slaves were subsequently confiscated in accordance with the prevailing political dynamics. More often than not, these slaves were confiscated and then granted to new officials.
T'sok nobi (entrusted slaves) were individuals who voluntarily offered themselves as slaves to the powers that be or to the large-scale landlords that developed during late Kory?. However, while the slaves obtained through this t'sok system appeared on the surface to have been seized through legal means. there is much reason to believe that such individuals werein fact forcefully turned into slaves by the powers that be. This assertion is supported by the fact that this type of slave also became the subject of confiscation on the part of the state during the above-mentioned reforms. In this regard, the fact that the insang muy?k nobi (slaves obtained through personal transactions) were, like the t'sok nobi, made the object of confiscation only serves to further heighten the possibility that this type of slave was also initially seized through illegal means.
These four classes of slaves (sag?n nobi) were regarded as being separate from the cho?p nobi, or private slaves inherited from one's ancestors. However, the marked increase in the number of slaves resulting from the practices of amnyang wich'?n (壓良爲賤, degradation of a commoner to slave or lowborn class) and sap'e (賜牌, deeds to land and slaves granted by the king) raises the possibility that some cho?p nobi were in fact included within the four classes of slaves as either t'sok nobi or kisang nobi. These cbo?p nobi in all likelihood were included amongst these four classes of slaves (sag?n nobi) either as part of indirect efforts to curry the favor of those in power, or of direct subjugation to the latter. Furthermore, the increase of slaves granted to meritorious subjects andof the kisang nobi offered to those in power led to a decrease of oegwan nobi (public slaves). Therefore, the emergence of these four classes of slaves (sag?n nobi) in many ways clearly illustrates the serious problems which plagued the management of the slave system during this particular period.
Several institutional mechanisms were put in place to overcome the evil practices associated with the slave system. These included the establishment of the Panggo gamj?n py?lgam (房庫監傳別監, Office of Land and Slave Property Documents), Ch'lli py?nj?ng togam (察理辨整都監, Directorate for the Return of Illegally Seized Slaves to the Original Ownership), and Ch?nmin py?nj?ng togam (田民辨整都監, Directorate for Reclassification of Farmland and the Farming Population). However, the emergence of a host of pressing issues during the final period of Kory? such as the restoration of the king to the throne. conflicts between the various political factions, and the deterioration of relations with Yuan, all but ensured that the reforms failed to achieve the desired results. Furthermore, the ability to maintain aconsistent slave policy was further hindered by the fact that the main actors behind these reformseffectively switched places with the initial targets of these reforms: and by the fundamental contradiction that saw the king andother members of the royal family become the recipients of the slaves that had been confiscated.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 충선왕대 사건노비의 몰수와 그 배경
Ⅲ. 충혜왕대 사건노비의 몰수와 그 배경
Ⅳ. 사건노비의 유형화와 노비정책의 변화
Ⅴ. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국 한시에 나타난 노비
동양고전연구
2017 .01
-
소송을 통해 본 17세기 노비횡탈 양상 : 해남윤씨가(海南尹氏家) 안심(安心)자녀 소송 문서를 중심으로
역사와현실
2013 .03
-
노예의 성과 자유 —선언, 부인, 계산 그리고 결혼
영어영문학21
2006 .01
-
賣買奴婢에서 家生奴婢로 : 琿春駐防의 奴婢階層 構成의 變化, 1736-1849
동양사학연구
2014 .12
-
한국 고대사회에서 노비와 노비노동의 역할
한국고대사연구
2003 .03
-
진천 평산 신씨 노비 가족의 존재양상 -노비의 결혼과 가계 계승을 중심으로-
古文書硏究
2018 .01
-
전근대 베트남의 노예신분 연구
역사학보
2012 .06
-
近代轉換期小說에 나타난 主奴葛藤의 樣相과 意味
어문학
2005 .06
-
Korean Education : Master of the Future or Slave of the Past?
Korea Journal
1963 .09
-
조선후기 노비 家系와 婢 - 筆巖書院 <奴婢譜>의 분석을 통하여 -
여성과역사
2009 .01
-
18세기 丹城縣 官奴婢의 존재양태
한국사연구
2005 .12
-
양반가에서의 노비 역할 : 전라도 부안의 우반동김씨가의 사례를 중심으로
지방사와 지방문화
2012 .05
-
18-19세기 노비 호구수 변화 양상에 대한 재검토 : 호적대장을 바라보는 새로운 시각
역사민속학
2017 .06
-
18세기 奴·主 紛爭의 한 사례 연구― 조선후기 변화된 사회상과 관련하여 ―
古文書硏究
2005 .01
-
‘復讐說 類型’의 傳承樣相과 小說的 變容
한국문학논총
2004 .01
-
구약의 노비 해방법과 조선 후기 노비 현상
구약논단
2012 .03
-
The Heroic Slave : An Exposition of Douglass in His Narrative
19세기 영어권 문학
2006 .02
-
17·18세기 호적대장의 私奴婢 기재 실태 -경상도 단성현 권대유家 노비를 중심으로 -
古文書硏究
2004 .01
-
朝鮮時代 奴婢 市場과 去來 : 1707년 매매 흥정 書簡과 尙州牧奴婢賣買立案을 중심으로
장서각
2014 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002013442