지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This thesis is to examine out the revision aspects of Hyul-e-nu(Tears of Blood), and to confirm the original text of the work which is basis for the studies on the early Korean modern literature. To do so, a comparative study is carried out on the various versions of the work published after the Korean Liberation and its source work. First, the Hyul-e-nu(Tears of Blood) which is serialized in Mansebo and the Hyul-e-nu(Tears of Blood) which is published in a separate volume in Gwanghakseopo are compared. And then, the import of the revision is analyzed by the comparative study on the Gwanghakseopo version and the original version published in Dongyangseowon. After proceeding such textual criticism, the various versions of the work published in some publishing company after the Korean Liberation are examined out.
According to the result of this study, it is confirmed out that the original text of Hyul-e-nu(Tears of Blood) is the Mansebo serialized version(1906), the Gwanghakseopo version, and the Dongyangseowon original version. There is a marked difference between the Gwanghakseopo version and the Dongyangseowon version. There are internal and external elements for that difference. The external element is the oppressed surroundings in the fields of speech and publication resulting from Japan’s governing by the bayonet after the collapse of the Daehan Empire. The internal element is Lee In-Jik’s political ambition and his way of getting on in the world.
The stylistic features of the three source books are examined out in the detailed study on sentence, passage and dialogue, Chinese characters, and concluding endings. From the Mansebo version to the Gwanghakseopo version, the mixed style of Korean and Chinese characters is changed into exclusive style of Hangeul. The parts of speech of the figures in the Mansebo version and the Gwanghakseopo version become apart from the passage. Arriving at the Dongyangseowon version, they are used together, not to be divided. The spelling method of Chinese characters in the Mansebo version employs a mixed method in Korean, Chinese, and Japanese. In case of the concluding endings, the mixed use of ‘～Da’ and ‘～Deora’ is changed into the frequent use of ‘～Deora’ in the Gwanghakseopo version.
Examining out the source text of the Hyul-e-nu(Tears of Blood), a lot of the works take the Gwanghakseopo version as the source text. And some texts take the Dongyangseowon original version as the source text. and particularly, there is a text in which the serialized version in Jeguksinmun.
According to the result of this study, it is confirmed out that the original text of Hyul-e-nu(Tears of Blood) is the Mansebo serialized version(1906), the Gwanghakseopo version, and the Dongyangseowon original version. There is a marked difference between the Gwanghakseopo version and the Dongyangseowon version. There are internal and external elements for that difference. The external element is the oppressed surroundings in the fields of speech and publication resulting from Japan’s governing by the bayonet after the collapse of the Daehan Empire. The internal element is Lee In-Jik’s political ambition and his way of getting on in the world.
The stylistic features of the three source books are examined out in the detailed study on sentence, passage and dialogue, Chinese characters, and concluding endings. From the Mansebo version to the Gwanghakseopo version, the mixed style of Korean and Chinese characters is changed into exclusive style of Hangeul. The parts of speech of the figures in the Mansebo version and the Gwanghakseopo version become apart from the passage. Arriving at the Dongyangseowon version, they are used together, not to be divided. The spelling method of Chinese characters in the Mansebo version employs a mixed method in Korean, Chinese, and Japanese. In case of the concluding endings, the mixed use of ‘～Da’ and ‘～Deora’ is changed into the frequent use of ‘～Deora’ in the Gwanghakseopo version.
Examining out the source text of the Hyul-e-nu(Tears of Blood), a lot of the works take the Gwanghakseopo version as the source text. And some texts take the Dongyangseowon original version as the source text. and particularly, there is a text in which the serialized version in Jeguksinmun.
목차
1. 서론
2. 「혈의 누」 원전의 문제
3. 『만세보』 연재본과 광학서포본의 비교
4. 광학서포본과 동양서원본의 비교
5. 결론
참고 문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (12)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
〈혈의누〉의 원전 비평적 연구
우리말글
2007 .12
-
『花郞世紀』 두 사본의 성격
역사학보
2003 .06
-
〈王慶龍傳〉異本考 : 李憲洪 所藏本을 대상으로
비평문학
2010 .12
-
송강가사의 선본 재고
열상고전연구
2018 .01
-
신자료 한문본 〈소대성전(蘇大成傳)〉의 발굴과 의미
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2017 .09
-
게임-인간version 1.04
인물과사상
2001 .06
-
Why So Many Bible Versions
성경원문연구
2003 .02
-
星湖 李瀷의 『藿憂錄』 4종 판본에 대한 고찰
태동고전연구
2014 .01
-
〈완월회맹연〉의 이본현황과 서지적 특징
어문학
2011 .03
-
『햇볕 속의 건포도』의 핵심 주제 이해와 다양한 버전 선택 문제
신영어영문학
2016 .11
-
국문본 〈김영텰뎐〉의 이본적 위상과 특징
국어국문학
2011 .04
-
『孝經諺解』 이본에 대한 비교 연구
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2012 .03
-
개화기 소설의 한․중․일 번역 양상에 관하여－天路歷程의 고유명사 표기를 중심으로－
이중언어학
2012 .01
-
『경민편(언해)』동경교대본과 규장각본 연구 - 한문 원문 및 구결의 차이 -
우리말글
2005 .04
-
『신약젼셔』(1906년) 로마서의 번역 고찰
성경원문연구
2011 .10
-
20세기 이전 중국어 성서 번역의 역사와 의의
한국기독교신학논총
2019 .10
-
성경 번역에서의 일관성 점검과 한글 성경 역본들
성경원문연구
2011 .04
-
필사본 ｢조생원전｣의 이본 유형과 담론 변이의 특징
한국문학논총
2020 .01
-
<김희경전>의 이본 계열과 텍스트 확정
어문연구
2007 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-018859288