메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
서강대학교 법학연구소 서강법학 서강법학 제10권 제1호
발행연도
2008.6
수록면
71 - 87 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
After People's Resistance in June, the Korean Constitutional Law of 6th Republic was made in 1987 through political conference which was composed of the representatives from the majority party as well as the minority party. The Constitutional Law of 6th Republic pursued free democratic society where people's basic rights were guaranteed in maximum. The Constitutional Court system was adopted in Korea to achieve this goal. According to the Constitutional Law of the 6th Republic, the judicial independence and political neutrality was guaranteed by the provisions that prohibited the Justices of the Constitutional Court from doing political activities and guaranteed their status.
Since last year, the fourth Constitutional Court has been in activity. By the way, the 3rd Constitutional Court that existed from September in 2000 to September in 2006 showed remarkable characteristics in the fact that the Court took bold steps in dealing with political cases such as the Presidential Impeachment case and Capital Relocation case. In addition, they say the 3rd Constitutional Court showed, by and large, strong conservative judicial inclination. This paper will analyze and criticize three representative political cases by the 3rd Constitutional Court: Decision to be Constitutional in presidential impeachment case, Decision to be Constitutional in Article 7 of National Security Act case, and Decision to be Unconstitutional in Capital Relocation case and evaluate the three cases in political and social contexts as well. Finally, this paper will explore the characteristics of the judicial inclination of the 3rd Constitutional Court in the perspective of 'the protection of minority's rights.'

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 대통령 탄핵사건 기각결정
Ⅲ. 국가보안법 제7조의 찬양ㆍ고무죄 등에 대한 합헌결정
Ⅳ. 신행정수도건설특별법에 대한 위헌결정
Ⅴ. 정치적 사건에의 과감한 개입 v. 소수자 인권의 보호
Ⅵ. 결론
Abstract

참고문헌 (13)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018402995