지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Buyeo is the ancient and second oldest nation of Korea that was established and was followed by Gojoseon centering around the middle stream of the Songhua River in the 2nd century B. C. China has engaged in academic efforts to include the history of this area with their history of the Han Tribe since they recovered the Manchu region of China from Japan in 1945. Recently, they have attempted to complete this work through the Northeast Project. This study aims to investigate the facts and figures of their research on the history of the Buyeo Kingdom mat has been made so far and how the Chinese people recognize Buyeo. Then, we will consider the research direction for Korea on Buyeo's history.
Research and exploration on the relics of Buyeo's culture may be classified into three periods. The 1st period is from the time after the Manchu area was conquered by Japan until 1945 when Manchu was liberated. During this period, it was mainly elementary-level archeological researches that were conducted by Japanese scholars. The 2nd period is from 1945 (the year of independence) until the 1970s. In the period, relics of the Buyeo culture were found in the process of basic archeological researches being conducted on the entire area of Jilin Sheng as well as a few relics of the Buyeo culture were found in the process of exploring the relics of the Xituanshan Culture. The 3rd period begins in 1980s until the present. During this period, full-scale research and exploration were conducted on the relics of Buyeo culture based on the researches made in the previous periods. The relic sites of the Buyeo culture that were found reached about 70 places. Among them, excavation was made only in 9 places. In other relic sites, relics of the Buyeo culture were found through simple surface surveys.
Reviewing the facts and figures of the researches on the Buyeo Kingdom conducted by China, about 80 theses have been reported so far and mainly in the 1980s and 1990s. Among them, there were 49 pure academic research theses and 32 survey reports on relics. Among the 49 research theses, 30 were based on literatures and 19 were the theses related to archeology.
As for the history of Buyeo conducted by China according to the periods, it was in the 1930s that research on Buyeo was conducted for the first time. The initial research started from historical researches through the literature on the geographical location. From the 1950s to the 1970s, the Chinese Cultural Revolution proceeded full scale in society and most archeological researches on Jilin were focused on the Xituanshan Culture. Thus, there was scarce research on the history of Buyeo at that time. Beginning in the 1980s, research on the Buyeo Kingdom was remarkably advanced. Reaching he stage where comprehensive cultural understanding on the Xituanshan Culture was possible, researchers turned their interests gradually to the culture of Buyeo. Also, increases in archeological literature relating to Buyeo were actively made and the research became systematic and detailed. Since researches in that period were quoted with literary and archeological materials, all research was done systematically and comprehensively.
The research on Buyeo conducted by China has different opinions according to the regions to which the researchers belong such as Liaoning Sheng, Jilin Sheng, Heilongjiang Sheng, etc. It is because they had different intentions to apply to Buyeo's history for the benefit of the region to which they belong. To summarize the recognition of the Chinese on the history of the Buyeo Kingdom, Buyeo is a local regime that belonged to the Chungyen Kingdom that was established by a rival tribe in the ancient northeast area of China. Based on this recognition, all researches on the history of Buyeo have been currently made and such recognition was applied to all mass media and publications.
Research and exploration on the relics of Buyeo's culture may be classified into three periods. The 1st period is from the time after the Manchu area was conquered by Japan until 1945 when Manchu was liberated. During this period, it was mainly elementary-level archeological researches that were conducted by Japanese scholars. The 2nd period is from 1945 (the year of independence) until the 1970s. In the period, relics of the Buyeo culture were found in the process of basic archeological researches being conducted on the entire area of Jilin Sheng as well as a few relics of the Buyeo culture were found in the process of exploring the relics of the Xituanshan Culture. The 3rd period begins in 1980s until the present. During this period, full-scale research and exploration were conducted on the relics of Buyeo culture based on the researches made in the previous periods. The relic sites of the Buyeo culture that were found reached about 70 places. Among them, excavation was made only in 9 places. In other relic sites, relics of the Buyeo culture were found through simple surface surveys.
Reviewing the facts and figures of the researches on the Buyeo Kingdom conducted by China, about 80 theses have been reported so far and mainly in the 1980s and 1990s. Among them, there were 49 pure academic research theses and 32 survey reports on relics. Among the 49 research theses, 30 were based on literatures and 19 were the theses related to archeology.
As for the history of Buyeo conducted by China according to the periods, it was in the 1930s that research on Buyeo was conducted for the first time. The initial research started from historical researches through the literature on the geographical location. From the 1950s to the 1970s, the Chinese Cultural Revolution proceeded full scale in society and most archeological researches on Jilin were focused on the Xituanshan Culture. Thus, there was scarce research on the history of Buyeo at that time. Beginning in the 1980s, research on the Buyeo Kingdom was remarkably advanced. Reaching he stage where comprehensive cultural understanding on the Xituanshan Culture was possible, researchers turned their interests gradually to the culture of Buyeo. Also, increases in archeological literature relating to Buyeo were actively made and the research became systematic and detailed. Since researches in that period were quoted with literary and archeological materials, all research was done systematically and comprehensively.
The research on Buyeo conducted by China has different opinions according to the regions to which the researchers belong such as Liaoning Sheng, Jilin Sheng, Heilongjiang Sheng, etc. It is because they had different intentions to apply to Buyeo's history for the benefit of the region to which they belong. To summarize the recognition of the Chinese on the history of the Buyeo Kingdom, Buyeo is a local regime that belonged to the Chungyen Kingdom that was established by a rival tribe in the ancient northeast area of China. Based on this recognition, all researches on the history of Buyeo have been currently made and such recognition was applied to all mass media and publications.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 유적 조사 현황
Ⅲ. 연구현황과 연구사 검토
Ⅳ. 맺음말
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
扶餘史 연구의 쟁점과 자료 해석
한국고대사연구
2005 .03
-
高句麗의 夫餘 出源에 관한 認識의 變遷
고구려발해연구
2007 .06
-
일제강점기 일본인에 의한 扶餘位相의 提高 努力에 대한 考察
문화와 예술연구
2019 .01
-
부여·고구려 건국신화의 계통과 형성과정 : 『三國遺事』 북부여조 인용 ‘古記’에 대한 분석을 실마리로 하여
동북아역사논총
2011 .12
-
부여의 天下觀 小考
사학연구
2008 .06
-
三國의 相互關係를 通해 본 高句麗 正體性
고구려발해연구
2004 .12
-
『後漢書』 「東夷列傳」 〈夫餘國傳〉 분석
문화사학
2004 .06
-
일제 식민지 상황에서의 부여(扶餘) 고적에 대한 재해석과 "관광명소" 화
비교문화연구
2003 .07
-
위진남북조시기 중국의 코리안 디아스포라 : 고조선 · 고구려 · 부여계 이주민 집단 연구
한국사학보
2018 .08
-
고구려본기의 부여 관계 기사와 ‘동부여’의 실체
사학연구
2019 .12
-
The names for dog in the modern Turkic languages
알타이학보
2013 .01
-
조남익 시 연구
어문연구
2010 .01
-
일본 학계의 부여사 인식과 滿鮮史
한국사학보
2018 .08
-
백제와 부여의 계승성 여부에 대한 검토
동북아역사논총
2018 .09
-
부여 석목리 143-16번지 유적 문자자료 소개
목간과문자
2019 .06
-
『三國史記』 百濟本紀의 溫祚傳承과 沸流傳承
역사와 담론
2015 .01
-
부여 초기 및 전기왕성에 대한 고고학적 검토
동양학
2016 .01
-
선사시대에서 역사시대로의 전환에 대한 역사 서술과 연구 방법론
역사와 담론
2013 .01
-
扶餘八景의 詩的 形象
어문연구
2005 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-019486307