지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
We demonstrate in this paper that three anaphors in Korean are basically different in their semantic functions. In particular, we demonstrate, following Reinhart (1983, 1993), Higginbotham (1992), Heim (1992), Richards (1997), and Safir (2004), that Korean anaphors are closely related to coreference, variable binding, and common reference in their binding behavior. An advantage of our analysis is that it can make a semantic distinction among variable binding, coreference, and common reference for any NPs. Besides the difference between coreference and binding observed in this paper, anaphors can be analyzed by the relationship with common reference, coreference, and variable binding. When two arguments of a predicate are coindexed, that predicate is reflexive. However, caki cannot bear the ability to reflexivize a predicate without the speaker's intention. That caki is interpreted as associated with its linguistic antecedent implies that it is linked to its antecedent through the occurrence of common reference. In contrast, the discriminating use signaled by the speaker's intention does not hold for heavy reflexives such as ku-casin and caki-casin. This leads us to hypothesize that they can be interpreted as related to their antecedents either by coreference or by binding without common reference arising from the speaker's intention.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Variable Binding and Coreference
3. Common Reference, Coreference, and Binding
4. Further Semantic Points
5. Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
A Semantic Analysis of a Preference Reading
언어학 연구
2008 .05
-
The So-called SELF Anaphor
새한영어영문학
2006 .08
-
On the Referential Distinction of Anaphors
영어영문학연구
2005 .01
-
한국어 재귀사 ‘자기’의 속성
언어
2014 .12
-
‘자기’의 정체를 찾아서
한국어학
2016 .08
-
Understanding Korean Exempt Binding by Korean Heritage Speakers in China
응용언어학
2011 .06
-
A CASE OF ANAPHOR-ANTECEDENT REVERSAL AND BINDING THEORY
언어학
2001 .08
-
Logophors and Discourse Participants
영어영문학연구
2010 .01
-
Repair, Revision, and Complexity in the Syntactic Analysis of Dependency Relations for the three Korean Anaphors: An ERP-based Neurophysiological Differentiation
생성문법연구
2014 .01
-
한국어의 ‘나’, ‘자신’ 그리고 ‘나 자신’
언어학
2015 .04
-
Distributive and Collective Readings in a Conjunct NP Antecedent
영어영문학연구
2008 .01
-
Control and Binding in Korean
언어
1982 .12
-
Binding Interpretations of Korean Core Reflexives by Korean Hertiage Speakers in US and in China
응용언어학
2010 .03
-
한국어 대용어 ‘자기’에 대한 비통합적 접근
언어학
2014 .12
-
피결속-변항 대명사로서의 ‘자기’
생성문법연구
2014 .01
-
Complexity and Revision in the Syntactic Analysis of Dependency Relation in Korean : An ERP Study of the Long-distance Anaphor Caki
언어
2013 .12
-
결속과 통제의 의미특성
언어과학연구
1987 .12
-
Demarcating Local vs. Long-Distance Binding : Re-examining Tensed S Condition (TSC) in Korean
언어학 연구
2013 .04
-
중국인 학습자의 한국어 재귀사 '자기' 습득
이중언어학
2017 .01
-
Aspects of Binding Phenomena in Three Chinese Reflexives
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
2019 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-705-001712662