지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The current study re-examined Tensed S Condition (TSC) in its validity of demarcating local vs. long-distance binding and compared local vs. long-distance anaphors in Korean (i.e. caki-casin and caki). While Korean TSC-violating anaphors have been assumed to be core anaphors, this study hypothesizes that TSC-violating local anaphors are indeed exempt anaphors. 35 Korean native speakers were tested over an Acceptability Judgment Task combined with an Interpretation Task that is composed of 175 Korean sentences representing various binding conditions and Korean local and LD anaphors. The overall results showed that Korean native speakers treated TSC-violating anaphors more like exempt anaphors rather than core anaphors. In addition, TSC-violating LDA caki was not very different from TSC-violating caki-casin in its overall behaviors.
목차
1. Introduction
2. The Study
3. Discussion
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-700-003655721