지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In 『Samguk Yusa』 , the history of Shilla is periodized in a fashion different from the one featured in 『Samguk Sagi』. It describes the history of Shilla in three eras, the 'Early ancient' period, the 'Middle ancient' period, and the 'Late ancient' period. Among them, the Middle ancient period, which is established as commenced with the introduction of Buddhism, could be considered the most distinctive characteristic of this kind of periodization. Then again, this kind of periodization only appears in the 'Chronological table' volume, and some scholars have argued that this volume actually did not come from Ilyeon himself. So, to be examined in this article would be, whether we could consider the periodization of Shilla history suggested in 『Samguk Yusa』 to be consistent with Ilyeon's own perception of the Shilla's history or not, and how he was periodizing the history of Shilla afrer all.
First of all, cross-checking the 'Extraordinary things' volume with the 'Chronological table' volume, especially in each volume's 'Middle ancient' section, revealed a huge difference in both the documented contents and the fashion they were described. And the 'Extraordinary things' volume did not contain any reference to the periodization in question. This backs up the hypothesis that was presented earlier to suggest the possibility that the 'Chronological table' volume might have been 'added' (later some time). So, the previous belief which considered the Shilla history periodization featured in the 'Chronological table' volume as also part of Ilyeon's thinking should be reconsidered.
In the meantime, we should also note that, in structural terms 'Extraordinary things' volume shows divisions in chapters and also in books(卷), which seems as a result of not some quantity problems but the author's very intention. 2nd book of this volume starts with the reign of King Munmu-wang, and it suggests that Ilyeon was considering the completion of the wee dynasties' unification (the state of 'Iltong Sam-han') to be very important, and also as a major breakthrough for the history of Shilla. Ilyeon established a unique historical structure viewing that the first dynasty Go-Joseon went through a period of division(from Sam-Han period through the wee dynasties period) and then the situation was resolved and the peninsula was unified under Shilla and that Shilla later went on to become Goryeo. In other words, Ilyeon considered the first unification ever, the unification which achieved 'Iltong Sam-han', as an important event which marked the beginning of a new era for the history of Shilla.
First of all, cross-checking the 'Extraordinary things' volume with the 'Chronological table' volume, especially in each volume's 'Middle ancient' section, revealed a huge difference in both the documented contents and the fashion they were described. And the 'Extraordinary things' volume did not contain any reference to the periodization in question. This backs up the hypothesis that was presented earlier to suggest the possibility that the 'Chronological table' volume might have been 'added' (later some time). So, the previous belief which considered the Shilla history periodization featured in the 'Chronological table' volume as also part of Ilyeon's thinking should be reconsidered.
In the meantime, we should also note that, in structural terms 'Extraordinary things' volume shows divisions in chapters and also in books(卷), which seems as a result of not some quantity problems but the author's very intention. 2nd book of this volume starts with the reign of King Munmu-wang, and it suggests that Ilyeon was considering the completion of the wee dynasties' unification (the state of 'Iltong Sam-han') to be very important, and also as a major breakthrough for the history of Shilla. Ilyeon established a unique historical structure viewing that the first dynasty Go-Joseon went through a period of division(from Sam-Han period through the wee dynasties period) and then the situation was resolved and the peninsula was unified under Shilla and that Shilla later went on to become Goryeo. In other words, Ilyeon considered the first unification ever, the unification which achieved 'Iltong Sam-han', as an important event which marked the beginning of a new era for the history of Shilla.
목차
머리말
1. 『삼국유사』 ‘중고(中古)’기 검토
2. 「기이(紀異)」편에 반영된 일연(一然)의 신라사 인식
맺음말
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
三韓 인식의 연원과 통일전쟁기 新羅의 天下觀
동방학지
2014 .01
-
新羅統一論의 궤적과 함의
한국사연구
2011 .06
-
三國統一後 新羅 支配體制의 推移
한국고대사연구
2001 .09
-
新羅史의 性格
문화사학
2004 .06
-
왜국(일본)에서 본 백제·고구려의 멸망
역사비평
2020 .02
-
신라사에서의 전제정치론과 왕권
역사와 담론
2018 .01
-
7세기 후반 한국사의 인식문제 : 신라의 백제통합론과 삼국통일론을 중심으로
한국사연구
2009 .09
-
新羅와 唐의 敎育體制 비교 -中央官學을 중심으로-
대구사학
2011 .01
-
신라 사회 여성의 정치 활동
사학연구
2005 .03
-
三韓 개념에 대한 비판적 고찰
史叢(사총)
2019 .01
-
一然의 國王觀 -『三國遺事』 ｢紀異｣ 편을 중심으로-
韓國史學史學報
2016 .01
-
7세기 중엽 羅唐關係에 관한 考察
사학연구
2004 .03
-
수ㆍ당의 교체 정국과 신라 불교계의 추이
한국고대사연구
2006 .09
-
신라불교년표
불교학보
1991 .11
-
[기획3 : 한ㆍ중 역사인식의 접점] 한국근현대사에서 고구려와 발해에 관한 인식 - 역사교과서를 중심으로 -
역사와현실
2005 .03
-
Han and Its New Use
Korea Journal
1989 .08
-
中國 正史 新羅傳에 記錄된 新羅 初期 王系 및 主要 集團의 出自
사학연구
2008 .09
-
樂을 통해서 본 신라인의 복속·통합 관념 - 가야금과 현금의 정치적 상징 -
한국고대사연구
2005 .06
-
9세기 나당관계와 재당신라인 사회
역사와경계
2020 .06
-
Relationship between Buddhist Sculpture of Shilla and China
Korea Journal
2000 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0