지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article is devoted to the development of different directions in the Soviet literature and political, economical and social factors that affected this process.
In the twenties of the 20th century there was a complicated political situation in Russia: the Civil War, the War Communism (1917-1921), the New Economic Policy(NEP)(1921-1928), the building of Socialism. In 1921-1928 the literature was flourishing in Russia, especially satire prose. Different authors depicted the Great October Socialist Revolution in their works. According to Zamyatin, the Great October Socialist Revolution has eliminated the culture of mankind, become an anti - Utopia and lead to totalitarianism. Platonov considered the building of Socialism to be an Utopia, phantasy that could never be materialized in reality. Bulgakov thought that Socialism was an artificial and very dangerous phenomenon. Olesha defined an opposition between human sensitive perception and cold reason of a machine. Zoshchenko's works, in which he vividly depicted the stratification of the society. the mode of life of an average man, made him famous all over the world.
Such writers as Kataev, Il'f and Petrov wrote about the socialistic reality but at the same time made fun of many negative phenomena of the society.
They all wrote in extravagantly fantastic and grotesque terms in order to intensify the satirical effect. The all seemed to have nothing in common with Socialism. In 1928 with the introduction of censorship in Russia there was the end of the Soviet satirical literature. A new direction - socialist realism - appeared in the Soviet literature. At that period of time many writers emigrated, others changed their manner of writing or wrote mediocre book. The majority of these very writers were strongly criticised by the Soviet Government, became outcasts or had even been killed. The satirical literature was declared invalid.
Nowadays, the satirical literature is gaining its popularity again. It has enriched the modern literature and its role in the Russian literature has been revalued.
In the twenties of the 20th century there was a complicated political situation in Russia: the Civil War, the War Communism (1917-1921), the New Economic Policy(NEP)(1921-1928), the building of Socialism. In 1921-1928 the literature was flourishing in Russia, especially satire prose. Different authors depicted the Great October Socialist Revolution in their works. According to Zamyatin, the Great October Socialist Revolution has eliminated the culture of mankind, become an anti - Utopia and lead to totalitarianism. Platonov considered the building of Socialism to be an Utopia, phantasy that could never be materialized in reality. Bulgakov thought that Socialism was an artificial and very dangerous phenomenon. Olesha defined an opposition between human sensitive perception and cold reason of a machine. Zoshchenko's works, in which he vividly depicted the stratification of the society. the mode of life of an average man, made him famous all over the world.
Such writers as Kataev, Il'f and Petrov wrote about the socialistic reality but at the same time made fun of many negative phenomena of the society.
They all wrote in extravagantly fantastic and grotesque terms in order to intensify the satirical effect. The all seemed to have nothing in common with Socialism. In 1928 with the introduction of censorship in Russia there was the end of the Soviet satirical literature. A new direction - socialist realism - appeared in the Soviet literature. At that period of time many writers emigrated, others changed their manner of writing or wrote mediocre book. The majority of these very writers were strongly criticised by the Soviet Government, became outcasts or had even been killed. The satirical literature was declared invalid.
Nowadays, the satirical literature is gaining its popularity again. It has enriched the modern literature and its role in the Russian literature has been revalued.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 1920년대 풍자작가들과 그 주제들
Ⅲ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (16)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
소비에트 전쟁문학의 흐름과 사회주의 리얼리즘
외국문학연구
2001 .06
-
The characteristics of English satirical novel in the eighteenth century
코기토
1970 .12
-
세계화 시대의 한국문학 : 세계문학과 지역문학의 좌표
국어국문학
2010 .08
-
20세기 러시아 아동문학 변천사 소고
동화와 번역
2012 .01
-
풍자소설 번역에서의 곁텍스트 기능 및 특징 : 『걸리버 여행기』 와 『동물농장』 을 중심으로
번역학연구
2013 .09
-
과학으로서의 문학 개념의 형성과 ‘知’의 표준화 - 주요 ‘문학개론서’를 중심으로 -
동방학지
2010 .01
-
최재서의 풍자문학론과 그 이후
우리문학연구
2012 .10
-
고려인문학의 성격과 전개 양상 : 1940~60년대 『레닌기치』 문예면에 나타난 고려인문학의 특징 고찰
현대소설연구
2010 .08
-
최초의 고려인 문학선집 『로력자의 고향』에 대한 문화사적 고찰
슬라브학보
2019 .06
-
해방기 학문으로서의 ‘현대문학’ 연구 : ‘문학개론’을 중심으로
국어국문학
2014 .09
-
문학교육에서의 인지의 문제 - 문학의 순환적 위계화의 필요성과 가능성
문학교육학
2003 .01
-
Literature of Revolution
Korea Journal
1961 .09
-
우리 문학의 연구 현황과 전망
우리말글
2004 .08
-
미디어융합시대 현대문학 연구의 방향
우리말글
2009 .12
-
The Influence of Chinese Literature on Korean Literature
Korea Journal
1972 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
신에 대한 믿음, 권력에 대한 풍자
김학수
한국노어노문학회 기타간행물
1994
.11
《미하일 조셴꼬 작품의 장르 변화 연구》 : 1920년대와 1930년대 단편소설들을 중심으로
정태언
노어노문학
2003
.12
채만식 장편소설의 신문ㆍ잡지 연재본과 단행본 비교 : 『탁류』와 『태평천하』를 중심으로
최유찬
한국학연구
2013
.12
채만식의 『어머니』 개작과 식민지 전사(前史)의 재구성
류동규
어문학
2013
.06
태평양전쟁직후 한일(韓日) 지식인의 ‘식민지 조선’에 대한 기억과 은폐된 욕망 : 채만식의 「민족의 죄인」과 다나카 히데미쓰의 「취한 배 醉いどれ船」를 중심으로
안미영
국어국문학
2010
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-892-014916002