지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The bulk of the Russian war literature appearing in Soviet publications deals with two major time spans in the history of the Soviet Union: the Revolution and civil war and the Second World War. Much of the literature dealing with the wars is written in the spirit of socialist realism Many works extol the war effort and dedication of Soviet citizens. They emphasize the pride of the people in their army, and promote the ideological and political values advocated by the Communist Party. It is particularly true in the literature dealing with the civil war.
It is well known that in the days of Stalin socialist realism was the official method of Soviet literature. The enforced implementation of the rigid principles of socialist realism helped to create the classics of Soviet literature, of which the classics of the civil war literature is a major part. Therefore, the civil war literature becomes not only the classics of Soviet war literature but those of socialist realism The fact that almost all of the important classics of the civil war literature were published before the public proclamation of socialist realism in 1934-〈Partisan〉(1921), 〈Armored Train 14-69〉(1922), 〈Chapaev〉(1923), 〈Rout〉(1927)-indicates the classics of the civil war literature did not follow the existing methods of socialist realism, rather the theories of socialist realism adopted the existing examples of the civil war literature.
The volume of literature about the Second World War shows no sign of decline. Some twenty thousand books on this subject had been published in the Soviet Union since the end of the war. But this literature develops and changes. It reacts to the needs of the day because the purpose of war prose is primarily ideological and political, as was true in the case of the civil war literature. Most critics divide the development of the war prose into three periods: the period of the war itself, the post-war era up to the late 1950s, and post-Stalin period up to now. The literature of the first period is mainly didactic and its emphasis is on the atrocities committed by the enemy, and the heroism of Soviet soldiers. The immediate post-war decade was dominated by Stalinism and, therefore, this period had little possibility of creating literature of any artistic merit. In the post-Stalin period a new approach to the subject of war developed with the decline of socialist realism Likewise, the Soviet literature depicting both the civil war and the Second World War acts as the indicator of the rise and fall of socialist realism.
It is well known that in the days of Stalin socialist realism was the official method of Soviet literature. The enforced implementation of the rigid principles of socialist realism helped to create the classics of Soviet literature, of which the classics of the civil war literature is a major part. Therefore, the civil war literature becomes not only the classics of Soviet war literature but those of socialist realism The fact that almost all of the important classics of the civil war literature were published before the public proclamation of socialist realism in 1934-〈Partisan〉(1921), 〈Armored Train 14-69〉(1922), 〈Chapaev〉(1923), 〈Rout〉(1927)-indicates the classics of the civil war literature did not follow the existing methods of socialist realism, rather the theories of socialist realism adopted the existing examples of the civil war literature.
The volume of literature about the Second World War shows no sign of decline. Some twenty thousand books on this subject had been published in the Soviet Union since the end of the war. But this literature develops and changes. It reacts to the needs of the day because the purpose of war prose is primarily ideological and political, as was true in the case of the civil war literature. Most critics divide the development of the war prose into three periods: the period of the war itself, the post-war era up to the late 1950s, and post-Stalin period up to now. The literature of the first period is mainly didactic and its emphasis is on the atrocities committed by the enemy, and the heroism of Soviet soldiers. The immediate post-war decade was dominated by Stalinism and, therefore, this period had little possibility of creating literature of any artistic merit. In the post-Stalin period a new approach to the subject of war developed with the decline of socialist realism Likewise, the Soviet literature depicting both the civil war and the Second World War acts as the indicator of the rise and fall of socialist realism.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 내전문학 : 사회주의 리얼리즘 문학의 전범(典範)
Ⅲ. 제2차 세계대전 문학 : 사회주의 리얼리즘의 재평가
Ⅳ. 결론
참고 문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Literature After the Korean War
Korea Journal
1977 .06
-
한국전쟁기 전쟁시의 국가주의의 시선
한국시학연구
2008 .04
-
The Korean War 1950-1953
Korea Journal
1967 .07
-
전쟁문학론의 전개와 폭력의 내면화－식민지 말과 한국전쟁기 문학론을 중심으로-
우리문학연구
2020 .04
-
냉전 초기 사회주의진영 내부의 전쟁·평화 담론의 충돌과 북한의 한국전쟁 인식 변화
역사와현실
2012 .03
-
베트남전쟁과 사회주의진영, 그리고 냉전체제
역사와경계
2010 .09
-
한국전쟁의 기본개념으로서 제한전(limited war)의 성립과 분화 : 한반도에 대한 전략적 가치 평가와 관련하여
한국사연구
2004 .06
-
“6.25”전쟁과 남북분단에 대한 성찰과 문학적 서사 : 중국문학과 조선족문학을 중심으로
통일인문학
2011 .05
-
‘전쟁의 기억’과 ‘기억의 전쟁’ : 특별한 피난체험을 중심으로
통일인문학
2014 .03
-
전쟁과 폭력에 대한 기독교 현실주의적 이해
대학과 복음
2004 .12
-
한국 전쟁영화의 발전과 특징 : 한국전쟁에서 베트남전쟁까지
지방사와 지방문화
2006 .11
-
재한 서구 개신교 선교사와 제1차 세계대전 : 「한국선교지(Korea Mission Field)」를 중심으로
신학연구
2014 .12
-
한국전쟁 60년, 한반도와 세계
역사비평
2010 .05
-
The Strategy for One Korea, and the Third War
신학논단
1994 .06
-
제2차 세계대전 시기 소련의 전쟁 포스터에 나타난 여성의 이미지
슬라브학보
2011 .06
-
한국전쟁기 38선 북진과 냉전의 고착화
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2005 .12
-
망각의 공동체와 기억의 소설적 의미-황순원의 〈나무들 비탈에 서다〉 연구-
한국현대문학연구
2002 .12
-
한국전쟁과 여성 : 경계에 선 여성들
역사비평
2010 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-705-003655631