메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국프랑스사학회 프랑스사 연구 프랑스사 연구 제17호
발행연도
2007.8
수록면
35 - 64 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Parlement of Rouen made efforts in order to contribute to social stability in as many area as assistance, public hygiene, security and education. Throughout the 16th and 17th centuries, expansion of epidemic and multiplication of the poor were the most serious social problems for Rouen as for many other cities in France. Before the 16th century, these problems had been occupied mainly by the Church and religious order. But Parlement began gradually for a good reason of exerting superintendency over public order and controling municipal institutions. However, as we examined, the Parlement didn’t obtain the excellent results in solving the problems as epidemic and poverty.
Firstly, the Parlement pronounce constantly laws, but its contents didn’t change much. The fact that similar regulations were repeatedly made means those regulations were not effective. In effect, the Parlement seemed to realize these disappointing performance. Especially, without sufficient financial support, the regulations could not settle the problems.
Secondly, we pay attention to the conflict between the Parlement and other social political organizations. The e chevins’ discontent concerning budget problem, people’s passive attitude towards toilet, conflicts with Madeleine congregation regarding the administration of Hotel-dieu and noncooperative attitude of doctors didn’t help the Parlement settle social problems notwithstanding its substantial efforts. The existence of these conflicts suggest the possibility that repeated regulations of the Parlement were meant not to solve social problems but to show its political power to other social groups. In effect, the Parlement refuse protestant doctors recommended by e chevins and demand catholic doctors to the university of Paris during the period of expansion of epidemic. Notwithstanding sincerity in solving the social problems, the Parlement didn’t ignore the relation with another political groups.
Finally, Rouen’s case indicates that the existing studies on conflicts between the Church and Secular authorities concerning the assistance organizations have some limits. There were not only conflicts between the Church and Secular authorities, but also conflicts between Parlement and other social groups such as e chevins, doctors and citizens. This shows the limit of dichotomous point of view.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 고등법원의 창설과 구성
Ⅲ. 전염병
Ⅳ. 빈민
〈참고문헌〉
〈Resume〉
〈Summary〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-926-016959400