지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The disciples of Kim Chang-hyeop·Kim Chang-heup from the latter half of the 17th century to the beginning of the 18th century had established academic tradition of the early Nak school. Kim Chang-hyeop's disciples had been characterized in the field of literature·Neo-Confucianism, afterwards some figures from that had joined Soron faction. Kim Chang-heup's disciples had had many of them leave brilliant achievements in the scope of literature·Neo-Confucianism, however what seems interesting to us is that they went through the Calamity of Noron literati of 1721·1722 and happened to take on a sudden conservative atmosphere in their academic tradition. As a result of this type of conservative trend, other figures who were closely related to Soron and were not actively involved with the movement of Anti-Policy of Impartiality had great difficulty in succeeding to Nak school. Under these circumstances, Yi Jae, who had not been under the instruction of Kim Chang-hyeop·Kim Chang-heup, happened to lead Nak school.
The view of Yi Jae, in light of theory on the nature of the mind, was clearly differentiated from that of Ho school, however he succeeded to realistic view of Song Shi-yeol, which was not much difference from that of Ho school. It is closely related to the academic tradition of Noron that was consistently lead only by Eui-ri centered basis. However Noron's Eui-ri gradually came to realize, thereby an academic trend which tried to get away from that was centered upon only Eui-Ri theory happened inside Nak school. Most of disciples of Yi Jae were faithful with Eui-ri theory, however some came to start to pay interest to the administrative theory whether or not it was limited. The interest paid to the administrative theory was mostly expressed through Ban-gye-surok. That was not a big change, but an important one in the academic tradition of Nak school.
Nak school in the latter half of the 18th century had developed in closer relation with conflict between Gong-hong and Bu-hong conflict and division of Sipa(Party of Expediency) and Byeokpa(Party of Principle). Ever since outbreak of the Calamity of Soron literati of 1755, Noron's Eui-ri was mostly accomplished in the political world, therefore the academic world of Nak school would be able to be free from Eui-ri theory in a way, which gave birth to various academic trends thereafter. This is one of the most important parts which can explain division of the Nak school. Nak school in those times largely divided into disciples of Kim Won-haeng and that Min Woo-soo. Kim Won-haeng’s disciples stuck to that of Nak theory on the nature of the mind, rather closer to the position of Bu-hong and Sipa. On the other hand, Min Woo-soo's disciples took on a tendency of Gong-hong and Byeokpa with it closely connected to Ho school. They also seemed to get near to Ho school's side from the aspect of theory on the nature of the mind.
The view of Yi Jae, in light of theory on the nature of the mind, was clearly differentiated from that of Ho school, however he succeeded to realistic view of Song Shi-yeol, which was not much difference from that of Ho school. It is closely related to the academic tradition of Noron that was consistently lead only by Eui-ri centered basis. However Noron's Eui-ri gradually came to realize, thereby an academic trend which tried to get away from that was centered upon only Eui-Ri theory happened inside Nak school. Most of disciples of Yi Jae were faithful with Eui-ri theory, however some came to start to pay interest to the administrative theory whether or not it was limited. The interest paid to the administrative theory was mostly expressed through Ban-gye-surok. That was not a big change, but an important one in the academic tradition of Nak school.
Nak school in the latter half of the 18th century had developed in closer relation with conflict between Gong-hong and Bu-hong conflict and division of Sipa(Party of Expediency) and Byeokpa(Party of Principle). Ever since outbreak of the Calamity of Soron literati of 1755, Noron's Eui-ri was mostly accomplished in the political world, therefore the academic world of Nak school would be able to be free from Eui-ri theory in a way, which gave birth to various academic trends thereafter. This is one of the most important parts which can explain division of the Nak school. Nak school in those times largely divided into disciples of Kim Won-haeng and that Min Woo-soo. Kim Won-haeng’s disciples stuck to that of Nak theory on the nature of the mind, rather closer to the position of Bu-hong and Sipa. On the other hand, Min Woo-soo's disciples took on a tendency of Gong-hong and Byeokpa with it closely connected to Ho school. They also seemed to get near to Ho school's side from the aspect of theory on the nature of the mind.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 17세기 후반~18세기 초 農淵 學脈의 면면과 특징
3. 18세기 중엽 李縡 學脈의 사상적 동향
4. 18세기 후반 金元行과 閔遇洙 學脈의 분화
5. 맺음말
〈부록〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
1960~1970년대 이상론(李箱論)의 향방
구보학보
2019 .01
-
도암 이재와 그 문인들의 낙학(洛學)적 사유
한국철학논집
2020 .01
-
이재 황윤석의 洛學 계승과 호남에 대한 자의식
동양철학연구
2010 .01
-
김창흡의 학문경향과 후대의 영향
한국인물사연구
2004 .09
-
백낙청의 ｢시민문학론｣에서 인식과 실천의 매개로서의 ‘사랑’ — ｢티마이오스｣에 대한 전유를 중심으로
인문논총
2019 .01
-
[논문] 17세기 후반~18세기 초 김창협(金昌協)·김창흡(金昌翕)의 학풍과 현실관
역사와현실
2004 .03
-
安東 金門의 지식논쟁과 지식권력의 형성 -農巖 金昌協의 학문적 입장을 중심으로-
민족문화연구
2012 .01
-
정치권력과의 상관관계로 본 金昌協･金昌翕의 문학비평과 그 성격 -18세기로의 전환기 한국한문학의 특성에 초점을 맞춰-
한국한문학연구
2017 .01
-
渼湖 金元行의 性理說 硏究 - 18세기 중반 洛論의 심성론에 유의하여
민족문화연구
2016 .01
-
碩齋 尹行恁의 陸王學 비판에 대한 인식형성 배경과 그 목적
동방학지
2014 .01
-
한국전쟁과 낙동강, 가려진 현실의 융기 − 임권택의 ｢洛東江은 흐르는가｣를 대상으로 −
한국사상과 문화
2011 .01
-
Analysis of Seongho Yi Ik’s Theory of Cognition
Korea Journal
2016 .09
-
Discursive Structures and Cultural Features of Nak-ron Thought in Late Joseon Korea
Korea Journal
2011 .03
-
손창섭『落書族』의 ‘껍데기/알맹이’의 상징성 연구
어문학
2011 .12
-
삼연 김창흡의 미발설과 호락논쟁에서 그 위상
열상고전연구
2018 .01
-
조선 후기 낙론계 학풍에 대한 연구 현황과 전망
오늘의 동양사상
2006 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-374-016729006