지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
1. Kim Chang Hyeob and Km Chang Heub brothers are historical figures who suggested the political and philosophical direction for the Noron/老論 faction's Nak-ron/洛論 theories during the 18th century. Their academical achievements are very important subjects in current historical studies examining the political and philosophical status of the time.
2 They supported the Euiri/義理 theory devised by Song Shi Yeil, and tried to politically promote and strengthen the Noron faction's Euiri theories. They were also passionately engaged in studies of Juja theories. Yet their academical approach to the subject showed some different aspects from that of Song Shi Yeol. In major characteristics they shared Song's approach, but in details there were differences, due to the influences from Lee Dan Sang and Jo Seong Gi, who represented the academical color of the scholars' society or the Seoul and Gyeonggi region in the 17th century.
3. Compared with the Horon members' position, the Kim brothers demonstrated a rather flexible approach to the Hwaih/華夷 theories and in their expressions of their own sense of reality. In example, while Song Shi Yeol maintained a highly critical opinion about Heo Hyeong who served the supposedly barbaric Yuan dynasty, Kim Chang Hyeob thought rather positively of Heo Hyeong. The Kim brothers also revealed some different perspectives regarding the Legitimacy theory, and did not consider the matter of Legitimacy to be a moral issue at all. Hence their perception of the Ching dynasty, which was still presumably barbaric in origin in the Chinese public's view, as another form of legitimacy. They also demonstrated some flexible view of Jin Ryang and upon the Buddhism matte. And they also maintained some objectivity in honoring Song Shi Yeol, unlike the Noron faction members of the Hoseo/湖西 area who practically worshipped Song.
4. As we can see, Kin Chang Hyeob and Chang Heub brothers honored the Noron Euiri theories of the Hoseo region at least in political term, but in academical terms they were significantly influenced by the characteristics of the 17th century Seoul Gyeonggl Seoin/西人 members. So while they were passionately supporting the Noron faction's Euiri theory, they maintained a rather different attitude from that or the Hoseo region Noron members who were blindly following Song Shi Yeol's approaches. The following Ho-Rak/湖洛 debate was literally on outbreak of these differences that have been accumulated for yearsk.
2 They supported the Euiri/義理 theory devised by Song Shi Yeil, and tried to politically promote and strengthen the Noron faction's Euiri theories. They were also passionately engaged in studies of Juja theories. Yet their academical approach to the subject showed some different aspects from that of Song Shi Yeol. In major characteristics they shared Song's approach, but in details there were differences, due to the influences from Lee Dan Sang and Jo Seong Gi, who represented the academical color of the scholars' society or the Seoul and Gyeonggi region in the 17th century.
3. Compared with the Horon members' position, the Kim brothers demonstrated a rather flexible approach to the Hwaih/華夷 theories and in their expressions of their own sense of reality. In example, while Song Shi Yeol maintained a highly critical opinion about Heo Hyeong who served the supposedly barbaric Yuan dynasty, Kim Chang Hyeob thought rather positively of Heo Hyeong. The Kim brothers also revealed some different perspectives regarding the Legitimacy theory, and did not consider the matter of Legitimacy to be a moral issue at all. Hence their perception of the Ching dynasty, which was still presumably barbaric in origin in the Chinese public's view, as another form of legitimacy. They also demonstrated some flexible view of Jin Ryang and upon the Buddhism matte. And they also maintained some objectivity in honoring Song Shi Yeol, unlike the Noron faction members of the Hoseo/湖西 area who practically worshipped Song.
4. As we can see, Kin Chang Hyeob and Chang Heub brothers honored the Noron Euiri theories of the Hoseo region at least in political term, but in academical terms they were significantly influenced by the characteristics of the 17th century Seoul Gyeonggl Seoin/西人 members. So while they were passionately supporting the Noron faction's Euiri theory, they maintained a rather different attitude from that or the Hoseo region Noron members who were blindly following Song Shi Yeol's approaches. The following Ho-Rak/湖洛 debate was literally on outbreak of these differences that have been accumulated for yearsk.
목차
머리말
1. 송시열계 노론 의리론의 표방
2. 서울·경기지역 서인 학풍의 계승
3. 새로운 화이론 이해와 현실관
맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
18세기 洛論系 學脈의 변모양상 연구
역사교육
2007 .06
-
우암의 의리사상과 현대적 의미
한국사상과 문화
2004 .01
-
정치권력과의 상관관계로 본 金昌協･金昌翕의 문학비평과 그 성격 -18세기로의 전환기 한국한문학의 특성에 초점을 맞춰-
한국한문학연구
2017 .01
-
서한논쟁을 통해 본 삼연 김창흡의 시의식
한국인물사연구
2004 .09
-
中國 初期 唱和詩 硏究 : 東晋에서 梁代를 중심으로
중어중문학
2006 .12
-
金昌協의 朱子書 연구와 『朱子大全箚疑問目』
한국사연구
2013 .03
-
청주지역의 書院ㆍ祠宇
역사와실학
2001 .01
-
조선 후기 낙론계 학풍에 대한 연구 현황과 전망
오늘의 동양사상
2006 .04
-
Song of My Seoul
Korea Journal
1966 .09
-
김창흡의 학문경향과 후대의 영향
한국인물사연구
2004 .09
-
김창흡의 정치기반과 활동
한국인물사연구
2004 .09
-
조선후기 호남지역 사족의 정치ㆍ사회적 동향 - 17세기 광주 순천박씨 가문의 성장과 노론으로서의 활동을 중심으로
古文書硏究
2011 .01
-
17세기 서인=노론의 상업관과 상업정책론
역사와현실
1999 .09
-
安東 金門의 지식논쟁과 지식권력의 형성 -農巖 金昌協의 학문적 입장을 중심으로-
민족문화연구
2012 .01
-
A Song of Life (9)
Korea Journal
1980 .06
-
19세기 전반의 가곡과 『歌譜』의 존재 양상
우리문학연구
2002 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-013793525