지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since Palhae is generally considered the nation which succeeded to Koguryo, the history of Palhae can be naturally included in that of Korea. In China, the history of Palhae and Koguryo is argued to be included in that of China. In this arguing situation between the two nations, it makes a difference whether reconstructed Palhae countries and Koryo had the consciousness of succession to Palhae or not. It enables us to set the history of Palhae in the point of view of the whole Korean history. The abstract of this study is as follows.
Firstly, this study is on the consciousness of the succession to Palhae of reconstructed Palhae countries. According to Songsa(宋史) Jeonganguk clearly had the consciousness of the succession to Palhae, and Palhae to Koguryo. Jeonganguk used the tradition of reign-title as Palhae, which suggests the possibility that it has succeeded to the tradition of Palhae. Heungryoguk was founded by Daeyeonrim, who was a descendant of Daejoyoung who had founded Palhae. It is considered that Heungryoguk is one of the succeeding countries of Palhae in the point that one of the successors of Palhae kingdom founded this nation. This nation also used the tradition of reign-title, which shows it succeeded to the treadition of Palhae. DaePalhae is one of the revived countries which was founded by a group of people whose main founder was Koyoungchang. DaePalhae can be estimated one of the reconstructed Palhae contries in the points that the name of the country is mostly charted by the name Palhae and the main founder was one of the drifting people from the falling of Palhae whose forefathers were from Koguryo.
Secondly, this study is on the consciousness of the succession to Palhae of Koryo. The consciousness of the succession to Palhae in the whole history of Koryo is not conspicuously presented by the way of recorded documents. Koryo put emphasis on the succession to Koguryo rather than to Palhae. The reason for this is that the national policies of Koryo is more easily established by the consciousness of the succession to Koguryo rather than to Palhae. The early history of Koryo presents a relatively higher possibility of the consciousness of the succession to Palhae than the middle history of Koryo, the late history presents some internal consciousness of the succession to Palhae.
In today's study of the history of Palhae, the most controversial problem is that to which country the history of Palhae is subjected. The purpose of this study is nothing but to suggest one of the solutions of this problem. Not any country asserted that it had succeeded to Palhae after its falling. Lio(遼) and Jin(金) are not the successors to Palhae even though they had been founded in the same geographical area as Palhae. Only the reconstructed Palhae countries and Koryo had the consciousness of the succession to Palhae. Therefore the history of Palhae belongs to that of Korea.
Firstly, this study is on the consciousness of the succession to Palhae of reconstructed Palhae countries. According to Songsa(宋史) Jeonganguk clearly had the consciousness of the succession to Palhae, and Palhae to Koguryo. Jeonganguk used the tradition of reign-title as Palhae, which suggests the possibility that it has succeeded to the tradition of Palhae. Heungryoguk was founded by Daeyeonrim, who was a descendant of Daejoyoung who had founded Palhae. It is considered that Heungryoguk is one of the succeeding countries of Palhae in the point that one of the successors of Palhae kingdom founded this nation. This nation also used the tradition of reign-title, which shows it succeeded to the treadition of Palhae. DaePalhae is one of the revived countries which was founded by a group of people whose main founder was Koyoungchang. DaePalhae can be estimated one of the reconstructed Palhae contries in the points that the name of the country is mostly charted by the name Palhae and the main founder was one of the drifting people from the falling of Palhae whose forefathers were from Koguryo.
Secondly, this study is on the consciousness of the succession to Palhae of Koryo. The consciousness of the succession to Palhae in the whole history of Koryo is not conspicuously presented by the way of recorded documents. Koryo put emphasis on the succession to Koguryo rather than to Palhae. The reason for this is that the national policies of Koryo is more easily established by the consciousness of the succession to Koguryo rather than to Palhae. The early history of Koryo presents a relatively higher possibility of the consciousness of the succession to Palhae than the middle history of Koryo, the late history presents some internal consciousness of the succession to Palhae.
In today's study of the history of Palhae, the most controversial problem is that to which country the history of Palhae is subjected. The purpose of this study is nothing but to suggest one of the solutions of this problem. Not any country asserted that it had succeeded to Palhae after its falling. Lio(遼) and Jin(金) are not the successors to Palhae even though they had been founded in the same geographical area as Palhae. Only the reconstructed Palhae countries and Koryo had the consciousness of the succession to Palhae. Therefore the history of Palhae belongs to that of Korea.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 발해 부흥국가의 발해 계승의식
Ⅲ. 고려의 발해 계승의식
Ⅳ. 계승의식과 발해사의 귀속문제
Ⅴ. 맺음말
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Several Questions in Studies of the History of Palhae
Korea Journal
1990 .06
-
발해문화의 고구려계승
고구려발해연구
2007 .03
-
북한의 발해유적과 성격
역사와경계
2008 .09
-
渤海建築에 關한 北韓의 硏究成果
고구려발해연구
2007 .03
-
考古學을 通해서 본 中國의 渤海文化 硏究
고구려발해연구
2006 .09
-
발해의 영역에서 본 고구려 계승성
고구려발해연구
2006 .03
-
발해 유민사를 바라보는 다양한 시선
역사와 세계
2020 .06
-
韓國史料로 본 渤海國
고구려발해연구
2007 .03
-
요대의 발해유민 연구 : 중화인민공화국 학자들의 논저에 대한 토론
고구려발해연구
2007 .12
-
금(金)건국과 발해유민 : 중화인민공화국 학자들의 주장에 대한 토론
고구려발해연구
2007 .12
-
발해ㆍ일본의 교류개시기에 대한 검토 : 『續日本紀』養老4年記事를 중심으로
고구려발해연구
2009 .11
-
발해국의 주민구성에 관한 연구
인문학논총
2008 .02
-
발해 ‘東京’ 지역의 고구려 문화 요소
고구려발해연구
2006 .12
-
渤海遺民史 硏究
고구려발해연구
2006 .12
-
발해 고고유적 출토 동물 유체의 현황과 분석
고구려발해연구
2019 .11
-
발해 사찰유적의 건축형식 연구
고구려발해연구
2006 .03
-
渤海와 日本의 交流 航路 變化에 관한 연구
역사교육
2013 .06
-
발해의 멸망ㆍ유민사에 대한 연구 현황과 과제
역사와 세계
2006 .08
-
渤海의 마지막 왕 大諲譔에 대한 諸問題의 검토
한국민족문화
2007 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-017333210