지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Ranke said history should be recorded objective and scientifically. Current Chinese scholars use too much errotic arguments like these.
Following are problems of Chinese scholars' concepts about [Chin foundation and Palhae people]
1. Are Jurchen and Palhae are same race? Wan-yen Jurchen who founded Chin are emigrations after the ruins of Silla so there are no any relationships. During that time period there were bunch of tribes that called Jurchen by themselves. Consequently, Wan-yen Jurchen used Palhae people politically.
2. Could the logic that China's political power was from accepted ancient China culture be formed?
This is not correct. Becaues Palhae kept using Yeon Ho(年號), and they used the word 'Emperor' instead of 'King'. If they insist Palhae is local politic because of the truth that modeling system and bringing tribute, all of the other countries that interchanged with Tang are also Tang's local politics.
3. I cannot agree to the assertion that Koryo is accession of Koguryo. ①On the publication of Samguksagi(三國史記), they considered Silla, Baek Jae, and Koguryo as a One country, it is Koguryo is One of the category of Koryo's ancestor, and ②Gung Ye(弓裔) used Koryo as his first name of the country this means they succeed to Koguryo. After that Koryo Wang Gun also used Koryo as the name of his country.
Beside these, in the China's Xinwudaishi(新五代史) and Jiuwudaishi(舊五代史) that are called Jung Sa(正史) refers the connection of Koguryo and Koryo.
4. When the Palhae had been founded, Jurchen helped them, Koryo wasn't even care about it. Because they did not considered as the same race.
5. We cannot agree to the assertion that Go Young-Chang's naming Dayuan(大元) of The Emperor of Great Palhae(大渤海皇帝) is for founding Political power of rivalry of powerful Leaders(割據政權). If their main purpose was Political power of rivalry of powerful Leaders, why did they used the world 'Emperor'?
6. Palhae is the country that had been built in Palhae's territory, but not the country that had been built on Tang's remaining territory. Therefore Palhae is not Tang's local politic.
7. I cannot agree to the assertion that Chin developed rapidly after ruin of Liao(遼) and Song(宋) either.
Chin has lots of contents that imitated Liao's old systems after ruining them. Even though they ruined Song and operated Song's old system, they did not imitated the whole systems.
Following are problems of Chinese scholars' concepts about [Chin foundation and Palhae people]
1. Are Jurchen and Palhae are same race? Wan-yen Jurchen who founded Chin are emigrations after the ruins of Silla so there are no any relationships. During that time period there were bunch of tribes that called Jurchen by themselves. Consequently, Wan-yen Jurchen used Palhae people politically.
2. Could the logic that China's political power was from accepted ancient China culture be formed?
This is not correct. Becaues Palhae kept using Yeon Ho(年號), and they used the word 'Emperor' instead of 'King'. If they insist Palhae is local politic because of the truth that modeling system and bringing tribute, all of the other countries that interchanged with Tang are also Tang's local politics.
3. I cannot agree to the assertion that Koryo is accession of Koguryo. ①On the publication of Samguksagi(三國史記), they considered Silla, Baek Jae, and Koguryo as a One country, it is Koguryo is One of the category of Koryo's ancestor, and ②Gung Ye(弓裔) used Koryo as his first name of the country this means they succeed to Koguryo. After that Koryo Wang Gun also used Koryo as the name of his country.
Beside these, in the China's Xinwudaishi(新五代史) and Jiuwudaishi(舊五代史) that are called Jung Sa(正史) refers the connection of Koguryo and Koryo.
4. When the Palhae had been founded, Jurchen helped them, Koryo wasn't even care about it. Because they did not considered as the same race.
5. We cannot agree to the assertion that Go Young-Chang's naming Dayuan(大元) of The Emperor of Great Palhae(大渤海皇帝) is for founding Political power of rivalry of powerful Leaders(割據政權). If their main purpose was Political power of rivalry of powerful Leaders, why did they used the world 'Emperor'?
6. Palhae is the country that had been built in Palhae's territory, but not the country that had been built on Tang's remaining territory. Therefore Palhae is not Tang's local politic.
7. I cannot agree to the assertion that Chin developed rapidly after ruin of Liao(遼) and Song(宋) either.
Chin has lots of contents that imitated Liao's old systems after ruining them. Even though they ruined Song and operated Song's old system, they did not imitated the whole systems.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구사
Ⅲ. 금초(金初) 발해유민의 동태에 대한 중화인민공화국학자들의 논지에 대한 토론
Ⅳ. 금(金) 건국이전의 상황에 대한 중화인민공화국학자들의 견해에 대한 토론
Ⅴ. 결론 및 요약
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
요대의 발해유민 연구 : 중화인민공화국 학자들의 논저에 대한 토론
고구려발해연구
2007 .12
-
발해 부흥국가와 고려의 발해 계승의식
역사와경계
2006 .09
-
발해문화의 고구려계승
고구려발해연구
2007 .03
-
발해의 영역에서 본 고구려 계승성
고구려발해연구
2006 .03
-
발해 유민사를 바라보는 다양한 시선
역사와 세계
2020 .06
-
考古學을 通해서 본 中國의 渤海文化 硏究
고구려발해연구
2006 .09
-
Several Questions in Studies of the History of Palhae
Korea Journal
1990 .06
-
渤海建築에 關한 北韓의 硏究成果
고구려발해연구
2007 .03
-
북한의 발해유적과 성격
역사와경계
2008 .09
-
韓國史料로 본 渤海國
고구려발해연구
2007 .03
-
渤海遺民史 硏究
고구려발해연구
2006 .12
-
발해 고고유적 출토 동물 유체의 현황과 분석
고구려발해연구
2019 .11
-
발해의 멸망ㆍ유민사에 대한 연구 현황과 과제
역사와 세계
2006 .08
-
발해국의 주민구성에 관한 연구
인문학논총
2008 .02
-
발해 ‘東京’ 지역의 고구려 문화 요소
고구려발해연구
2006 .12
-
발해ㆍ일본의 교류개시기에 대한 검토 : 『續日本紀』養老4年記事를 중심으로
고구려발해연구
2009 .11
-
연해주 발해성곽의 구조와 성격
중앙고고연구
2017 .01
-
발해 사찰유적의 건축형식 연구
고구려발해연구
2006 .03
-
渤海와 日本의 交流 航路 變化에 관한 연구
역사교육
2013 .06
-
渤海 佛敎彫刻의 새로운 考察 : 中國, 日本 古代彫刻과의 比較를 중심으로
고구려발해연구
2007 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-019496527