지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper aims to make clear the textbook policy and the realities of its execution in Korea, 1945~1953. The textbook policy in those days was related to the abolition of colonial education and establishment of national and democratic education. Because the textbook policy affected the contents and the quality of textbooks essential to the learning of next generation. Therefore, Korean Language Society(朝鮮語學會) and the others participated in the textbook compilation and the establishment of textbook policy directly after liberation.
But the publishing companies were in the difficulties for paper & printing and the many irrationalities appeared, as Korea divided into two and the economic crisis was serious. It was the first task to secure the paper necessary to publish the textbooks. And it was the second task to guarantee the background which can support the compilation. publication and supply of textbooks. From this point of view the establishment of textbook policy and the enactment of syllabus of lectures(敎授要目) were more important than the other immediate works. Therefore, the U. S. Military Government and the Korean Government carried out the textbook policy by taking the government designated textbooks(國定敎科書) with the authorized textbooks(檢認定敎科書) together, while they were absorbed in the enactment of syllabus of lectures. And the Ministry of Education of the Republic Korea ordered the schools not to use the books which Choi, Nam-seon(崔南善) and Lee, Kwang-soo(李光洙) of pro-Japanese wrote in order to establish the national education system.
The various plans necessary to execute the textbook policy were proposed by the academia, the educational world and the press. The educational world insisted that the schools take the government-run textbooks(國營敎科書) with the government designated textbooks on the ground that the government could provide the textbooks smoothly and standardize the predicates. Dong-a Ilbo(東亞日報) insisted that the government control the thoughts by leading the textbook compilation.
On the contrary, Korean Educator Federation(朝鮮敎育者聯合會) and the others criticized the textbook compilation which the nation monopolized and requested the compilation of scientific and democratic textbooks.
Son, Jin-tae(孫晋泰), an editorial officer and Choi, Hyeon-bae(崔鉉培), a former editorial officer insisted that the primary schools use the government designated textbooks and the middle schools use the authorized textbooks on the ground that the government could accept the opinions of acadmia and the publishing world can rise the quality of textbooks. And the Ministry of Education stabilized the textbook policy by observing the approval procedures(檢認定節次) in the first half year of 1949. Finally, the Ministry of Education made up for the weakpoints which the government designated textbooks and the authorized textbooks had by allowing the schools to use the supplementary readers.
But the Ministry of Education canceled the authorization of textbooks that the left literary man or the scolars wrote and elimiated some part related to the thought problems. Therefore, the textbook policy converted the means necessary for the nation to control the education. Besides, ideology problems had considerable influence over the policy of authorized textbook, as Korean War broke out in 1950.
But the publishing companies were in the difficulties for paper & printing and the many irrationalities appeared, as Korea divided into two and the economic crisis was serious. It was the first task to secure the paper necessary to publish the textbooks. And it was the second task to guarantee the background which can support the compilation. publication and supply of textbooks. From this point of view the establishment of textbook policy and the enactment of syllabus of lectures(敎授要目) were more important than the other immediate works. Therefore, the U. S. Military Government and the Korean Government carried out the textbook policy by taking the government designated textbooks(國定敎科書) with the authorized textbooks(檢認定敎科書) together, while they were absorbed in the enactment of syllabus of lectures. And the Ministry of Education of the Republic Korea ordered the schools not to use the books which Choi, Nam-seon(崔南善) and Lee, Kwang-soo(李光洙) of pro-Japanese wrote in order to establish the national education system.
The various plans necessary to execute the textbook policy were proposed by the academia, the educational world and the press. The educational world insisted that the schools take the government-run textbooks(國營敎科書) with the government designated textbooks on the ground that the government could provide the textbooks smoothly and standardize the predicates. Dong-a Ilbo(東亞日報) insisted that the government control the thoughts by leading the textbook compilation.
On the contrary, Korean Educator Federation(朝鮮敎育者聯合會) and the others criticized the textbook compilation which the nation monopolized and requested the compilation of scientific and democratic textbooks.
Son, Jin-tae(孫晋泰), an editorial officer and Choi, Hyeon-bae(崔鉉培), a former editorial officer insisted that the primary schools use the government designated textbooks and the middle schools use the authorized textbooks on the ground that the government could accept the opinions of acadmia and the publishing world can rise the quality of textbooks. And the Ministry of Education stabilized the textbook policy by observing the approval procedures(檢認定節次) in the first half year of 1949. Finally, the Ministry of Education made up for the weakpoints which the government designated textbooks and the authorized textbooks had by allowing the schools to use the supplementary readers.
But the Ministry of Education canceled the authorization of textbooks that the left literary man or the scolars wrote and elimiated some part related to the thought problems. Therefore, the textbook policy converted the means necessary for the nation to control the education. Besides, ideology problems had considerable influence over the policy of authorized textbook, as Korean War broke out in 1950.
목차
1. 序言
2. 臨時 敎科書 발행과 供給 실태
3. 國定ㆍ檢認定制 倂用과 敎科書 政策의 난맥
4. 結語
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
국어 교과서 검정제에 관한 실태 분석과 도입의 방향 탐색
이중언어학
2005 .01
-
교과서 문학 제재의 수용 양상 및 특성-제7차 국민공통기본교육과정 교과서를 중심으로
문학교육학
2003 .01
-
교수요목기 중등 역사 검정 교과서의 발행 상황과 목록화
역사교육
2019 .09
-
중국 초등학교 어문 교과서의 체제와 내용 분석
국어교육연구
2015 .10
-
A Comparative Research of Korean and Chinese Middle School English Textbooks
영어교과교육
2009 .01
-
중국어 2급 교재 어휘 분석 - 『國際漢語敎學通用大綱』과 비교하여
중국어문학논집
2019 .06
-
통사론 교육과 교과서
한국어학
2012 .11
-
국어 교과서에서의 이념 지향과 출판 정책
돈암어문학
2005 .12
-
문학 교과서 개발과 구성의 경직성에 대한 비판적 고찰－'작은 교과서'를 지향하며 －
문학교육학
2019 .01
-
‘한국사 교과서’ 조선 후기 신분제 내용의 劃一과 固着
역사교육
2016 .03
-
역사 교과서 검정발행제 분석
역사와실학
2007 .06
-
[한국사] 한국근현대사에서의 국가권력과 역사서술
역사학보
2014 .12
-
음운 교육과 교과서
한국어학
2012 .11
-
중등 국어과 교과서 내용 개발 전략 소고
국어문학
2006 .08
-
문법 영역의 성취기준 해설 등이 교과서 내용 구성에 미치는 영향 : 2015 개정 교육과정과 고등학교 국어 교과서를 대상으로
국어교육연구
2018 .06
-
解放後 歷史敎科書 發行制度의 推移
역사교육
2004 .09
-
국정 『국사』 교과서와 검정 『한국사』 교과서의 현대사 체계와 내용 분석
역사와현실
2014 .06
-
외국어 교수법의 변천과 한국어교재와의 상관성에 대한 연구- 전통적 교수방식에서 직접식 교수법까지 -
한말연구
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-374-015493661