지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study was going to make clear about meaning of the theory of ‘free verse’ which appeared through the contemporary cultural context in early 1920’s.
In this study first analyzed the theory of ‘free verse’ and lighted up whether these times poets were accepting ‘free verse’ in what kind of concept and a geound. Therefore we were able to know that they used a term called ‘free verse’ in order to designate a special form of a French symbolism poem. And they are not to have accepted that it must be pursued ‘free verse’ with itself. Because it was necessary, they accepted it on the process that found an ethnic form. Therefore a theoretical peculiarity occurred in structure of the theory of ‘free verse’ in this process. Because an ethnic personality was connected to a personality of an artist without a reason, the blank occurred.
We was able to make clear about the reason that a problem called ethnic personality was able to coexist with a personality in structure of the theory of ‘free verse’ through the contemporary cultural context. The culture meant a civilization in a cultural context of these times. And these times literature was the essence of culture. These times literature was recognized with symbol of a civilization or itself. Therefore, it was to mean ethnic civilization to have had literature. That an ethnic personality was able to be connected to a personality of an artist in this theory naturally is that these context who is cultural at that time was existing.
By the way, this culture theories were not to have especially appeared early in 1920’s. It was already appearing with culture theory of 1910’s. Lee Kwang-Su was already recognizing literature to be a symbol of a civilization in 1910’s. If Lee Kwang-Su emphasized an ethnic personality more, the new writers emphasized a personality of an artist more. If there was a difference, it is just this. However, they agreed on the thought that literature was a symbol of a civilization.
In this study first analyzed the theory of ‘free verse’ and lighted up whether these times poets were accepting ‘free verse’ in what kind of concept and a geound. Therefore we were able to know that they used a term called ‘free verse’ in order to designate a special form of a French symbolism poem. And they are not to have accepted that it must be pursued ‘free verse’ with itself. Because it was necessary, they accepted it on the process that found an ethnic form. Therefore a theoretical peculiarity occurred in structure of the theory of ‘free verse’ in this process. Because an ethnic personality was connected to a personality of an artist without a reason, the blank occurred.
We was able to make clear about the reason that a problem called ethnic personality was able to coexist with a personality in structure of the theory of ‘free verse’ through the contemporary cultural context. The culture meant a civilization in a cultural context of these times. And these times literature was the essence of culture. These times literature was recognized with symbol of a civilization or itself. Therefore, it was to mean ethnic civilization to have had literature. That an ethnic personality was able to be connected to a personality of an artist in this theory naturally is that these context who is cultural at that time was existing.
By the way, this culture theories were not to have especially appeared early in 1920’s. It was already appearing with culture theory of 1910’s. Lee Kwang-Su was already recognizing literature to be a symbol of a civilization in 1910’s. If Lee Kwang-Su emphasized an ethnic personality more, the new writers emphasized a personality of an artist more. If there was a difference, it is just this. However, they agreed on the thought that literature was a symbol of a civilization.
목차
1. 서론
2. ‘자유시‘론의 지향과 구조적 특징
3. ‘자유시‘론의 문화적 기반
4. 결론
참고문헌
저자소개
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
김영일의 ‘자유시론’과 ‘아동자유시집’ 『다람쥐』
아동청소년문학연구
2012 .06
-
해방 후 아동문학 ‘운문 장르’ 명칭에 대한 사적 고찰
아동청소년문학연구
2009 .12
-
한국과 일본에서의 자유시론의 성립 : 근대시의 인식과 선언
한국현대문학연구
2014 .04
-
한국의 자유시와 정형시의 관계
한국시학연구
2001 .05
-
소로우의 생태시문학적 ‘자유시’ 연구 : 『콩코드강과 메리맥강에서 보낸 일주일』을 중심으로
문학과환경
2014 .06
-
Prayer in Four Verses
Korea Journal
1963 .03
-
韓日 定型詩歌 比較硏究 : 詩形ㆍ律格ㆍ美意識을 중심으로
어문론집
2007 .03
-
시조의 漢詩譯과 漢詩의 時調譯의 문제점 연구
시조학논총
2007 .07
-
Sijo Verse in Korea
Korea Journal
1970 .06
-
한국 근대 자유시의 미적 전략과 근대적 서정의 형식
한국시학연구
2015 .12
-
서울굿 노랫가락의 장단분석
비교민속학
2005 .06
-
월봉산최월졍언셔상사가
돈암어문학
2006 .12
-
The Rhythmic Structure of b-verses in Gawain
영어학연구
2005 .01
-
時調의 李白 詩 受容에 관한 考察
어문학
2009 .09
-
시편 109편 6-19절은 시인의 기도인가? 원수들의 저주인가?
구약논단
2018 .09
-
제12호
한신논문집
1991 .11
-
고시조와 현대시조, 그 이어짐과 벌어짐의 사이
시조학논총
2008 .01
-
사회진화론의 수용과 근대시로의 전환
어문연구
2005 .01
-
정지용 시의 내적 동인으로서 童詩
한국시학연구
2002 .11
-
『어린이』지 수록 동시 연구(3) : 일제강점기 독자 투고 동시를 중심으로
한국아동문학연구
2014 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-015220925