지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2001.12
- 수록면
- 61 - 87 (27page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the location, population growth, and cargo concentration of Korean port-cities. In the location theory, Sommer (1976) and McGee (1967) models are newly introduced, as are the Rimmer (1967), Bird (1965), Hoyle (1981) models. which were already introduced in previous studies from Korea. Analysis of population growth in the Korean port-cities is conducted using data from 1966 to 1998. Rimmer and Hoyle's concentration models are used to measure cargo concentration from 1966 to 2000.
The main results of this paper are as follows: First, Korean ports are concentrated on the East Sea, the Southern Sea, and the West Sea. Their locations are closely related with the hinterland, the inland city, and growth of port-cities. In considering the foreign country's' cases, Korean port-cities are similar to the models of Bird and Hoyle. Second, the populations of Ulsan and Pohang grew at the fastest rate in 1966-1998, while the port cities in the Honam and Jeju region grew at much lower ratios. Most port cities are located near large industrial complexes. Third, the growth rates of Gwangyang, Daesan, Pohang, Pyungtaeg, and Samchunpo increased, while those of Busan, Mukho, Masan, Mogpo, Yeosu, and Sokcho declined. Of particular note, the growth rate of Busan remained negative after the late 1980s. Fourth. empirical results using the Rimmer (1967) model indicate that Gwangyang, Daesan, Pyungtag. and Pohang have shown the concentration. But the deconcentration was shown from the Busan, Mukho, Janghang, Gunsan, Mogpo, Yeosu, Masan, Sokcho, and Jeju. Fifth, the concentration of ports located in West coast region has shown the mixed results between concentration and deconcentration except the concentration of early 1970s and 1990s. The concentration of ports located in East coast region has shown the concentration before the middle of 19805. And deconcentration after the middle of 1980s have appeared. The Southern coast region has shown the continuous deconcentration except the partial concentration of early 1986, and 1991.
Planners of Korean ports should find out the factors of concentration and deconcentration of each ports and should determine factors such as investment priority level. size and scope in order to ensure the balanced development of regional ports and port-cities.
The main results of this paper are as follows: First, Korean ports are concentrated on the East Sea, the Southern Sea, and the West Sea. Their locations are closely related with the hinterland, the inland city, and growth of port-cities. In considering the foreign country's' cases, Korean port-cities are similar to the models of Bird and Hoyle. Second, the populations of Ulsan and Pohang grew at the fastest rate in 1966-1998, while the port cities in the Honam and Jeju region grew at much lower ratios. Most port cities are located near large industrial complexes. Third, the growth rates of Gwangyang, Daesan, Pohang, Pyungtaeg, and Samchunpo increased, while those of Busan, Mukho, Masan, Mogpo, Yeosu, and Sokcho declined. Of particular note, the growth rate of Busan remained negative after the late 1980s. Fourth. empirical results using the Rimmer (1967) model indicate that Gwangyang, Daesan, Pyungtag. and Pohang have shown the concentration. But the deconcentration was shown from the Busan, Mukho, Janghang, Gunsan, Mogpo, Yeosu, Masan, Sokcho, and Jeju. Fifth, the concentration of ports located in West coast region has shown the mixed results between concentration and deconcentration except the concentration of early 1970s and 1990s. The concentration of ports located in East coast region has shown the concentration before the middle of 19805. And deconcentration after the middle of 1980s have appeared. The Southern coast region has shown the continuous deconcentration except the partial concentration of early 1986, and 1991.
Planners of Korean ports should find out the factors of concentration and deconcentration of each ports and should determine factors such as investment priority level. size and scope in order to ensure the balanced development of regional ports and port-cities.
목차
ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 기존연구에 대한 검토
Ⅲ. 한국 항만도시의 입지, 인구성장 및 화물집중도 분석
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
엔트로피지수에 의한 국내항만의 화물집중도 측정
한국항만경제학회지
2004 .09
-
항만발전이 배후도시의 시민의식에 미치는 영향 : 광양항을 사례로
해양정책연구
2012 .06
-
동북아 물류환경 변화와 광양항의 허브항만 전략
한국항만경제학회지
2005 .09
-
Port-City Relations in Korea
한국항만경제학회지
1991 .07
-
지방화시대의 항만공사 도입과 활성화 방안
한국항만경제학회지
2003 .12
-
항만경쟁요인의 변화에 관한 연구 - 아시아 역내 인접 항만을 중심으로 -
한국항만경제학회지
2003 .06
-
우리나라 주요 항만의 중심항 발전전략
한국항만경제학회지
2005 .03
-
Suggestions for the competitiveness of the Port-Logistics industry in Busan port area - Focus on the port transport industry and port transport related industry -
한국항해항만학회지
2011 .01
-
중국항만을 중심으로 한 동북아 물류체제흐름 변화 연구
한국항만경제학회지
2004 .09
-
부산항 재개발 대상지의 개발우선순위 평가 및 개발방안에 관한 연구
한국항만경제학회지
2002 .06
-
HFP法에 의한 港灣自治公社 類型別 地域經濟에 미치는 影響 評價에 관한 硏究
한국항만경제학회지
2000 .08
-
정기선사의 기항지 선택요인에 관한 실증연구
한국항만경제학회지
2005 .06
-
개방형 항만정책 수립체제의 필요성과 구축방안에 관한 연구
해양정책연구
2007 .06
-
일본 컨테이너항만의 화물 집하능력 향상을 위한 정책 방안
수산해양교육연구
2011 .09
-
컨테이너 항만경쟁력 결정요인 분석
수산해양교육연구
2015 .02
-
港灣開發 槪念의 變化와 環境指針
한국항만경제학회지
1994 .08
-
Is Port Authority the Best Choice of Korean Port Reform?
한국항만경제학회지
2002 .12
-
민간운영업체의 참여를 통한 항만경쟁력 제고
한국항만경제학회지
2004 .09
-
A Conceptual Framework of Port Cooperation
한국항해항만학회지
2011 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
항만도시 부산의 성장과 내부구조에 관한 연구 ( Cityport`s Development and Spatial Structure in Pusan )
정정인
대한지리학회지
1991
.04
항만입지특성이 항만도시성장에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 : 평택항과 광양항을 중심으로
이정호
,
최병대
한국항만경제학회지
2014
.09
외생적 기업도시에서 협력적 기업도시로 : 포철과 포항의 관계를 중심으로
전상인
한국지역개발학회지
2011
.06
평택시 도시공간구조의 시계열적 변화 분석
오세현
,
이우종
국토계획
2012
.04
도시이미지 형성의 영향요소에 관한 연구 : 신도시보행자 공간을 중심으로
박지애
,
한동욱
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집 - 계획계
2010
.10
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-326-014567555