메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국유통경영학회 유통경영학회지 유통경영학회지 제22권 제5호
발행연도
2019.10
수록면
31 - 40 (10page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: It is widely accepted that debate is an effective educational tool that promotes development of a variety of essential skills for students. However, institutions attempting to newly implement it as part of their curricular and extracurricular programs face the challenge of adjudication quality assurance, which can harm the end product and slow effective distribution. While research establishing the broad educational value of debate has been conducted extensively, there is a lack of literature on how to effectively promote debate programs in new areas, especially in the area of building adjudication proficiency. And while there is a plethora of research in the field of international business and marketing about how new products can successfully enter new markets and provide quality assurance, there is a lack of literature in the field of debate education as a product. Research design, data, and methodology: This article adopts a qualitative examination utilizing three criteria that has a direct effect in promoting quality adjudication and developing adjudication proficiency in nascent communities where strong, experienced adjudicators are difficult to find: 1) adjudication paradigm, 2) adjudication evaluation, and 3) adjudication procedure. Different practices and schools of thought for each of these criteria are discussed, examined through an analysis of implementation in international tournaments, and best practices identified. Results: In terms of adjudication paradigms, after examining checklist, holistic, and balanced methods, a balanced paradigm is identified as most suited for promoting adjudication proficiency. In terms of adjudication evaluation, institutionalization of evaluation methods before and during tournaments are identified as being necessary for building adjudication proficiency. In terms of adjudication procedure, after examining independent and conferral processes, conferral judging is identified as most suited for promoting adjudication quality. Conclusions: Following the examination of common and best practices, this article provides practical recommendations for refining the quality of adjudication and the educational experience within nascent and developing debating communities. While limited by the dearth of existing literature directly relevant to the field, this article provides an initial qualitative survey that should provide groundwork for future researchers to rigorously test some of the propositions provided via further qualitative or quantitative measures.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청
Circlin, A. / 1986 / Judging, Evaluation, and the Quality of CEDA Debate / The National Forensic Journal 4:81~90 google schola Colbert, K. / 1995 / Enhancing Critical Thinking Ability Through Debate / Contemporary Argumentation and Debate 16:52~72 google schola Collins, D. / 2008 / Use of Information Systems to Enhance Feedback of Judging and Scoring of Amateur Competitive Activities google schola Dougherty, D. / 1990 / Understanding New Markets for New Products / Strategic Management Journal 11:59~78 google schola Fuentes, C. M. / 2000 / Analysis of the Implementation of ISO 9000 Quality Assurance Systems / Work Study 49(6):229~241 google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0