메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박수영
저널정보
한국가족법학회 가족법연구 가족법연구 제38권 제2호
발행연도
2024.7
수록면
335 - 364 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Supreme Court of Korea acknowledge the benefit of confirmation to the extent that a suit for confirmation serves as the most appropriate means to eliminate the risk and concerns of a plaintiff. So the Supreme Court said that even after the marriage is resolved by divorce, there is a benefit of confirmation in seeking invalidity if a status relationship such as marriage has a direct and significant impact on the current legal status, even if it is in the past. However, the Supreme Court en banc Decision recently acknowledges the benefit of confirmation even if the plaintiff does not present the current legal relationship related to the marriage, as it can be a valid and appropriate means of resolving related disputes at once. Marriage invalidity is more advantageous to the parties than divorce because the marriage has not been established from the beginning. However, if a child is born between the couple, the nullity of marriage has a serious impact on the child's legal relationship. The child may suffer from the nullity of marriage, throwing him or her into a new legal dispute. There is no misunderstanding of the legal principles regarding the benefit of confirmation in the existing judgment abolished by this ruling. This ruling cannot be absolved of blame that it misunderstood the legal principles related to the benefit of confirmation and recognized the benefit of confirmation too broadly. There is also a remarkable risk that people who have already divorced will overuse a lawsuit to simply delete their family relations register.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0