지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2018.8
- 수록면
- 287 - 314 (28page)
- DOI
- 10.35227/HYLR.2018.08.29.3.287
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Modern family relations are proceeding with personalization, equalization, pluralization and de-institutionalization, and the notion of traditional marriage system is also changing. One of the problems of this modern family system is the issue of same-sex marriage.
Marriage can be defined in many ways in general, but when it is defined as a contract in which a man and a woman live together, one man and one woman are not married. Currently in Korea, same-sex unions can not form any legal relationship, so we are not allowed to exercise civil rights. Currently in our country, same-sex unions can not form any legal relationship, so we are not allowed to exercise civil rights. In addition, recent global trends are pushing for legislation on same-sex unions.
We looked at the contents of the European Union agreement that influenced European countries to legalize eastern marriage, as well as the United Kingdom, France, Germany and the United States. Among Asian countries, Taiwan has legalized same-sex marriage. And we examined Japan, which does not recognize same-sex marriage but protects ordinances of local government. There is a similarity in the process of nationalization in Britain, France and Germany. These countries begin with social discussions, are carried out as civil unions or living partnerships, and then the differences between the person in the partnership and the person in the marriage are determined by the legal institution. In the United States, the system of same-sex unions, which was otherwise stipulated in federal and state laws, was recognized throughout the United States by the Supreme Court. Taiwan was allowed to marry the same man in accordance with the Supreme Court ruling while some local governments introduced the system as an ordinance. In Japan, some local governments receive some protection in the form of ordinances and orders, but this is considered the basis for further institutionalization rather than legal effect.
At present, discussions in Korea on the marriage issue show that first, the Supreme Court`s perception of marriage is based on the traditional marriage system. In other words, one man and one woman are said to be the subjects of marriage and apply to specific cases accordingly. Nor has legislation been made. At present, it is doubtful whether marriage can be allowed in Korea. First of all, because of the nature of family law, it is thought that marriage of the same sex is not possible anytime soon. Family law is thought to be formed by various factors such as history, culture, awareness of social members, economic environment, and so on. In particular, there is a question of whether we can live in the traditional family system and win sympathy from the majority of society members or make social arrangements.
Marriage can be defined in many ways in general, but when it is defined as a contract in which a man and a woman live together, one man and one woman are not married. Currently in Korea, same-sex unions can not form any legal relationship, so we are not allowed to exercise civil rights. Currently in our country, same-sex unions can not form any legal relationship, so we are not allowed to exercise civil rights. In addition, recent global trends are pushing for legislation on same-sex unions.
We looked at the contents of the European Union agreement that influenced European countries to legalize eastern marriage, as well as the United Kingdom, France, Germany and the United States. Among Asian countries, Taiwan has legalized same-sex marriage. And we examined Japan, which does not recognize same-sex marriage but protects ordinances of local government. There is a similarity in the process of nationalization in Britain, France and Germany. These countries begin with social discussions, are carried out as civil unions or living partnerships, and then the differences between the person in the partnership and the person in the marriage are determined by the legal institution. In the United States, the system of same-sex unions, which was otherwise stipulated in federal and state laws, was recognized throughout the United States by the Supreme Court. Taiwan was allowed to marry the same man in accordance with the Supreme Court ruling while some local governments introduced the system as an ordinance. In Japan, some local governments receive some protection in the form of ordinances and orders, but this is considered the basis for further institutionalization rather than legal effect.
At present, discussions in Korea on the marriage issue show that first, the Supreme Court`s perception of marriage is based on the traditional marriage system. In other words, one man and one woman are said to be the subjects of marriage and apply to specific cases accordingly. Nor has legislation been made. At present, it is doubtful whether marriage can be allowed in Korea. First of all, because of the nature of family law, it is thought that marriage of the same sex is not possible anytime soon. Family law is thought to be formed by various factors such as history, culture, awareness of social members, economic environment, and so on. In particular, there is a question of whether we can live in the traditional family system and win sympathy from the majority of society members or make social arrangements.
목차
Ⅰ. 서언
Ⅱ. 동성혼에 관한 외국의 입법례
Ⅲ. 동성혼에 관한 한국에서의 논의
Ⅳ. 결어
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (34)
참고문헌 신청
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김민중 / 2016 / 동성(同性) 간의 결합에 대한 법적 보호 / 동북아법연구 10 (1) : 191 ~ 240
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김선화 / 2015 / 동성혼의 법제화에 관한 고찰 / 이화젠더법학 7 (3) : 31 ~ 63
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 성중탁 / 2016 / 동성(同性)혼에 관한 최신 미연방대법원 OBERGEFELLETAL. v. HODGES 사건 판례와 그 시사점 / 법학논고 (53) : 1 ~ 29
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 이정훈 / 2016 / 동성혼과 생활동반자법에 관한 연구 - 동성생활동반자의 혼인신고 불수리처분에 대한 불복신청 사건 (서울서부지방법원 2014호파 1842)을 중심으로 - / 원광법학 32 (2) : 71 ~ 98
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 정영화 / 2017 / ‘동성혼’ 도입을 위한 헌법개정의 위헌성 -미국 연방대법원 ‘동성혼’ 판례의 ‘인간존엄’ 해석의 분석- / 홍익법학 18 (3) : 121 ~ 150
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김선화 / 2015 / 동성혼의 법제화에 관한 고찰 / 이화젠더법학 7 (3) : 31 ~ 63
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 성중탁 / 2016 / 동성(同性)혼에 관한 최신 미연방대법원 OBERGEFELLETAL. v. HODGES 사건 판례와 그 시사점 / 법학논고 (53) : 1 ~ 29
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 이정훈 / 2016 / 동성혼과 생활동반자법에 관한 연구 - 동성생활동반자의 혼인신고 불수리처분에 대한 불복신청 사건 (서울서부지방법원 2014호파 1842)을 중심으로 - / 원광법학 32 (2) : 71 ~ 98
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 정영화 / 2017 / ‘동성혼’ 도입을 위한 헌법개정의 위헌성 -미국 연방대법원 ‘동성혼’ 판례의 ‘인간존엄’ 해석의 분석- / 홍익법학 18 (3) : 121 ~ 150
이 논문과 연관된 판례 (2)
-
대법원 2015. 2. 26. 선고 2014므4734,4741 판결
[1] 혼인은 남녀가 일생의 공동생활을 목적으로 하여 도덕 및 풍속상 정당시되는 결합을 이루는 법률상, 사회생활상 중요한 의미를 가지는 신분상의 계약으로서 본질은 양성 간의 애정과 신뢰에 바탕을 둔 인격적 결합에 있다고 할 것이고, 특별한 사정이 없는 한 임신가능 여부는 민법 제816조 제2호의 부부생활을 계속할 수 없는 악질 기타 중대한 사유에 해당한다고
자세히 보기 -
서울서부지방법원 2016. 5. 25.자 2014호파1842 결정
남성으로 동성인 갑과 을의 혼인신고에 대하여 관할 구청장이 신고불수리 통지를 하자, 갑과 을이 불복신청을 한 사안에서, 혼인제도가 다양하게 변천되어 왔지만 혼인이 기본적으로 남녀의 결합관계라는 본질에는 변화가 없었고, 아직까지는 일반 국민들의 인식도 이와 다르지 않은 점 등의 여러 사정을 종합하면, 헌법, 민법 및 가족관계의 등록 등에 관한 법률에
자세히 보기
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
동성혼에 대한 재고 ―현행법상 해석론을 중심으로―
가족법연구
2019 .01
-
동성혼의 법제화에 관한 고찰
이화젠더법학
2015 .12
-
Protection for Marriage and the Family in a German Context ― Focusing on the Implications on the Discussion of Same-sex Marriage in South Korea ―
인권법평론
2023 .02
-
Marriage Trends in Korea : Changing Composition of the Domestic Marriage Market and Growth in International Marriage
한국사회학회 심포지움 논문집
2018 .05
-
우리나라에 있어서 동성혼의 법적 수용에 관한 고찰
원광법학
2019 .01
-
헌법 제36조 제1항을 중심으로 한 혼인의 헌법적 보장에 대한 검토
헌법학연구
2018 .01
-
국제결혼중개계약과 혼인신고의 문제점과 해결방안
한양법학
2016 .08
-
‘동성혼’ 도입을 위한 헌법개정의 위헌성 -미국 연방대법원 ‘동성혼’ 판례의 ‘인간존엄’ 해석의 분석-
홍익법학
2017 .01
-
혼인의사의 합치에 대한 재평가
가족법연구
2023 .03
-
혼인의 실질적 요건을 흠결한 사실혼의 가족법상 보호에 관한 소고
경희법학
2016 .01
-
유럽에서의 동성혼인 및 동성결합에 관한 최근의 동향
가족법연구
2021 .01
-
台湾地区同性婚姻合法化动向 -以台湾司法院大法官释字第748号为中心-
국제법무
2017 .11
-
혼인신고에서의 쌍방출석주의와 공증 ―제도 도입의 필요성과 예외의 설정을 중심으로―
가족법연구
2017 .01
-
Critical Discussion on Constitutionality of Same-sex Marriage in the United States
인문사회 21
2015 .01
-
여성 결혼이민자의 인권보호에 관한 고찰
법이론실무연구
2017 .08
-
사실혼과 비혼동거에 관한 연구 : 사실혼 배우자의 사망과 비혼동거 해소시의 청산을 중심으로
한양법학
2015 .08
-
‘졸혼(卒婚)’과 혼인제도
가족법연구
2018 .01
-
다문화가족 시대의 결혼중개업법 개선방안
한양법학
2024 .05
-
Nonstandard Employment and Shifting Economic Foundations of Marriage : A Comparison of the United States and Japan
한국사회학
2018 .02
-
미혼남녀의 정서적·당위적·기능적 결혼의향에 영향을 미치는 변인 연구
한국가족관계학회지
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0