지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study examines the implementation of Gu-un(求言; enlist advice) during the reign of King Yeongjo(英祖) alongside the administration of state affairs. Accepting candid advice received through Gu-un was considered a virtue of the monarch, and this practice continued throughout the Joseon Dynasty. However, since the 17th century, as remonstrances and petitions were increasingly used as means in factional strife, conflicts arising from this practice became persistent conflicts arose.
King Yeongjo sought to govern the state under Tangp’yo^ng theory(蕩平; political balance). In this context, the practice of Wung Ji Sang So(應旨上疏; The advice) began to create turmoil and was used to challenge his legitimacy, leading to a need for change. For a period, Gu-un was not implemented, and criticism of this stop followed by critical remarks.
In the latter part of King Yeongjo’s reign, Gu-un began to be implemented under the king’s initiative. These Gu-un was issued in accordance with the political atmosphere and the needs of the state. During times of political turmoil, Gu-un was not issued, but was practiced when deemed necessary. By implementing Gu-un, King Yeongjo demonstrated the virtues of a wise ruler while criticizing officials who did not respond to it. This approach was highly intentional, which was a highly deliberate move.
King Yeongjo sought to govern the state under Tangp’yo^ng theory(蕩平; political balance). In this context, the practice of Wung Ji Sang So(應旨上疏; The advice) began to create turmoil and was used to challenge his legitimacy, leading to a need for change. For a period, Gu-un was not implemented, and criticism of this stop followed by critical remarks.
In the latter part of King Yeongjo’s reign, Gu-un began to be implemented under the king’s initiative. These Gu-un was issued in accordance with the political atmosphere and the needs of the state. During times of political turmoil, Gu-un was not issued, but was practiced when deemed necessary. By implementing Gu-un, King Yeongjo demonstrated the virtues of a wise ruler while criticizing officials who did not respond to it. This approach was highly intentional, which was a highly deliberate move.
목차
요약
1. 머리말
2. 영조대 구언의 경향성과 특징
3. 붕당 간의 갈등과 구언
4. 제한적 구언의 운영과 의미
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
조선전기 유생상소와 조정공론 - 15세기 유생상소를 중심으로 -
漢文古典硏究
2022 .12
-
우탁의 지부상소 연구
한문학논집(漢文學論集)
2020 .01
-
광해군대 ‘회답겸쇄환사’의 파견(1617년)과 대일본외교
한일관계사연구
2015 .12
-
어전(御前)이라는 공간과 상소의 수사학 - 「간축객서(諫逐客書)」와「출사표(出師表)」를 중심으로 -
수사학
2024 .09
-
10∼13세기 初 고려 朝儀 운영
사학연구
2022 .06
-
Advice in Institution Discourse: International Briefings
언어학
2021 .04
-
고려전기 궁궐 구조와 국왕의 정치 공간 - ‘합문(閤門)’의 의미를 중심으로 -
역사와현실
2021 .03
-
조선시대 상소 일기자료의 실상과 가치
석당논총
2018 .01
-
高麗前期 異變現象 기록을 통해본 災異觀과 위기인식 : 『高麗史』 五行志 기록을 중심으로
역사와 담론
2016 .10
-
한국과 남아메리카 구비설화에 나타난 자연재난 인식의 메커니즘
문학치료연구
2017 .01
-
고려의 ‘不稱姓’의 특권과 王家
역사와 담론
2018 .01
-
재난의 양상과 재난인문학의 필요 - 세월호 참사 치유시를 중심으로
한국학연구
2025 .03
-
‘재난약자’ 담론에 대한 사회언어학적 분석
우리말연구
2021 .01
-
Nothing Disappeared: The Representation of Disaster Trauma and Testimony as the Image
Journal of Humanities Therapy
2021 .12
-
1826년 『예식통고(例式通攷)』의 편찬과 왕실재정의 정비 노력
역사와현실
2018 .03
-
위험 시대 "재난"과 정치적 책임
철학연구
2015 .03
-
동아시아 전통사회의 재이 DB 구축과 그 의미
역사와실학
2021 .08
-
家系와 婚脈을 통해서 본 仁興君家의 政治ㆍ社會的 位相
문화사학
2022 .12
-
재난 리터러시 관점에서의 코로나19 관련 정례브리핑에 대한 비판적 분석
한국언어문학
2022 .11
-
龍洲 趙絅의 應旨 上疏에 나타난 현실 비판과 그 의미
동방한문학
2016 .01
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092326601