지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 중국어문학연구회 중국어문학논집 中國語文學論集 第147號
- 발행연도
- 2024.8
- 수록면
- 187 - 208 (22page)
- DOI
- 10.25021/JCLL.2024.8.147.187
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper introduced previous studies on Verb-copying Construction and 把-Constructi on that form Compatible relationships. and based on this, the Characteristics of their Semantic Function and the Correspondence with Korean were examined. The results are as follows.
First, the Compatibility of the two Sentence types was first raised in the early 20th century when the theory of the Complementary distribution of xie miaoling(1991) was first raised, but it was difficult to find clear research results other than the Meaning Orientation and thinking Meaning of the Sentence type, and in particular, few studies related to the Korea-China contrast were conducted.
Second, VP1 of the Verb-Copying Construction was close to the Binding Structure, but the subsequent VP2 was less close to the Binding Structure. However, it was confirmed that the 把-Construction has a Positional limitation in the Presence of Modification Components because the Combination Structure of the Verb and the Complement led by the Preposition is relatively close.
Third, the difference between the Verb-Copying Construction and the 把-Construction confirmed that the Motion behavior was related to a temporal relationship. In other words, the 把-Construction represents the Completion State, and has an internal Structure consisting of the Starting Point, the Process of the Action, and the End Point. However, the Verb-Copying Construction consists of a dichotomous space of Old Information VP1 and New Information VP2. and it was confirmed that the two Event Structures were connected to each other.
Fourth, the Korean Correspondence between the Verb-Copying Construction and the 把-Construction was analyzed. In the case of the Verb-Copying Construction indicating the Meaning of the Sentence [-Complete type], the Second Verb corresponds to the Senten ce-closing ending of the Korean Language, and in the case of the 把-Construction, it was confirmed that the Chinese Predicate Corresponds to the Predicate accompanied by the Past final ending of the Korean language.
First, the Compatibility of the two Sentence types was first raised in the early 20th century when the theory of the Complementary distribution of xie miaoling(1991) was first raised, but it was difficult to find clear research results other than the Meaning Orientation and thinking Meaning of the Sentence type, and in particular, few studies related to the Korea-China contrast were conducted.
Second, VP1 of the Verb-Copying Construction was close to the Binding Structure, but the subsequent VP2 was less close to the Binding Structure. However, it was confirmed that the 把-Construction has a Positional limitation in the Presence of Modification Components because the Combination Structure of the Verb and the Complement led by the Preposition is relatively close.
Third, the difference between the Verb-Copying Construction and the 把-Construction confirmed that the Motion behavior was related to a temporal relationship. In other words, the 把-Construction represents the Completion State, and has an internal Structure consisting of the Starting Point, the Process of the Action, and the End Point. However, the Verb-Copying Construction consists of a dichotomous space of Old Information VP1 and New Information VP2. and it was confirmed that the two Event Structures were connected to each other.
Fourth, the Korean Correspondence between the Verb-Copying Construction and the 把-Construction was analyzed. In the case of the Verb-Copying Construction indicating the Meaning of the Sentence [-Complete type], the Second Verb corresponds to the Senten ce-closing ending of the Korean Language, and in the case of the 把-Construction, it was confirmed that the Chinese Predicate Corresponds to the Predicate accompanied by the Past final ending of the Korean language.
목차
1. 서론
2. 선행연구
3. 동사복사구문과 把구문의 의미기능
5. 결론
參考文獻
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
基于语料库的韩国学习者“把”字句偏误类型分析
중국어교육과연구
2024 .07
-
“把”字句语义色彩分析－以剧本《北京人在纽约》为中心
한중인문학연구
2019 .01
-
정보표지사 ‘把’의 품사 고찰
중국문학연구
2024 .05
-
Verb selection in the Way-Construction
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2015 .10
-
‘把’자구문의 ‘타동성’의 ‘정도성’에 대한 소고
중국어문학논집
2021 .10
-
针对韩国学习者“把”字句的教学实践探析 — 以韩国大学中文系《汉语语法》课程为例 —
중국언어연구
2024 .04
-
Two Different Types of Verb Phrase Fronting Constructions in Korean
어학연구
2022 .08
-
“把”字句【S+把+O+V+在/到+地方】格式中動詞語義特征對介詞“在/到”選擇的限定作用分析 : 从韩国学生的“把”字句偏误谈起
중국어교육과연구
2018 .12
-
기계번역의 교육적 활용 가능성 고찰 및 제안 — 把자문의 인간번역과 기계번역의 비교를 중심으로
중국어교육과연구
2022 .07
-
영어 중간태 동사 구문 : 영어 심리 동사를 중심으로
언어학 연구
2015 .04
-
국내 구문문법 연구의 구문 의미 관련 쟁점 검토
한국어학
2019 .08
-
西周及春秋戰國時期的連動式
언어와 정보사회
2017 .01
-
현대/고대 프랑스어 운동동사(Vmt-Vinf) 구문에 대한 비교연구
언어과학
2015 .01
-
‘N1+把+N2+V1+在/到+장소(위치)’ 문형과 ‘N1+把+N2+〔V1+R(결과보어)〕’문형의 유사성과 ‘타동성’의 정도성 차이
중국언어연구
2022 .10
-
중국어 ‘把’구문 습득에 관한 실험통사론적 연구
중국언어연구
2023 .02
-
『현대 한국어 동사 구문사전』 거시구조 기술의 문제
언어학
2016 .12
-
한국어 ‘-어 죽다’ 구성에 대한 연구
국어국문학
2016 .09
-
중국어 교육을 위한 동사복사문의 의미기능 연구 - 상태보어와 결과보어를 중심으로
중국어문학논집
2020 .10
-
‘把’자문의 절대적 정보지위 고찰
중국어교육과연구
2021 .05
-
Make 동사 의미에 대한 연구
언어과학연구
2019 .03
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0