지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2024.3
- 수록면
- 39 - 71 (33page)
- DOI
- 10.24285/CLER.2024.3.42.39
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper selected 11 major degree complementary constructions in modern Chinese and empirically analyzed differences between them in usage. We investigated the corpus use of a total of 11 constructions, derived ‘distinctive’ collexemes applying two of the distinctive collexeme analysis approaches, and discussed the differences.
In particular, this study took into account the fact that although these constructions are generally considered synonymous, there is also a lack of information about the collexemes that appear at position of complement, and derived fairly detailed and rigorous quantitative research results through an unprecedented scope of research. The results empirically verified and supplemented existing studies on degree complements, and suggested ‘good examples’ as well as ‘bad examples’ of major degree complement constructions for learner for L2, and lexicography work.
Theoretically, this study provided strong support for semantic theory’s claim that the study of linguistic units requires a constructional approach based on ‘usage’ investigations. In addition, this study can besaid to have improved existing corpus meaning research and contributed to the research field in that methodologically, it can be re-verified or disproved through other corpus investigations or experiments.
In particular, this study took into account the fact that although these constructions are generally considered synonymous, there is also a lack of information about the collexemes that appear at position of complement, and derived fairly detailed and rigorous quantitative research results through an unprecedented scope of research. The results empirically verified and supplemented existing studies on degree complements, and suggested ‘good examples’ as well as ‘bad examples’ of major degree complement constructions for learner for L2, and lexicography work.
Theoretically, this study provided strong support for semantic theory’s claim that the study of linguistic units requires a constructional approach based on ‘usage’ investigations. In addition, this study can besaid to have improved existing corpus meaning research and contributed to the research field in that methodologically, it can be re-verified or disproved through other corpus investigations or experiments.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제 제기
Ⅱ. 기존 연구
Ⅲ. 이론과 방법
Ⅳ. 코퍼스
Ⅴ. 분석 결과
Ⅵ. 나오며
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-089590325