메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
황지영 장희순 (강원대학교)
저널정보
한국주거환경학회 주거환경 住居環境 통권 제22권 제2호 (통권 제64호)
발행연도
2024.6
수록면
147 - 161 (15page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
According to the management status of apartment complexes in Seoul at the end of 2023, there are 960 apartment complexes that are over 30 years old, accounting for 25.4% of the total, and the number of apartment complexes that will be over 30 years old within the next 10 years is expected to reach 57.5%. Therefore, it is expected that the controversy over reconstruction will continue in the future. However, in 2006, the Act on Recovery of Excessive Reconstruction Profits came into effect, and the Reconstruction Excessive Profits Recovery System, which recovers up to 50% of development profits resulting from reconstruction, has consistently raised unconstitutional claims regarding infringement of property rights, violation of the principle of equality, and double taxation. It has been done. Under this background, the National Assembly proposed on June 5, 2024, the "Abolition of the Act on the Recovery of Reconstruction Excess Profits", which would abolish the recovery of excess profits from reconstruction. Recently, the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport also stated his position that the comprehensive real estate tax and reconstruction excess profit recovery system should be abolished. Therefore, this study examines the theoretical discourse on the maintenance or abolition of the reconstruction tax profit recovery system, which is the subject of controversy.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 고찰
Ⅲ. 선행연구 검토
Ⅳ. 질적자료의 분석방법
Ⅴ. 재건축초과이익환수제도의 존재와 폐지에 대한 인식조사
Ⅵ. 결론 및 시사점
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-151-24-02-090106384