메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이한영 (중앙대학교) 차성민 (한남대학교)
저널정보
한국경쟁법학회 경쟁법연구 경쟁법연구 제32권
발행연도
2015.11
수록면
30 - 51 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Article 66 (1) No.9 of Monopoly Regulation And Fair Trade Act provides “Any person who does or induces an unfair collaborative act in violation of Article 19 (1) …… shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than three years or by a fine not exceeding 200 million won”. In case that unfair collaborative acts are dealt in criminal process, decision of nature of unfair collaborative acts is matter. If unfair collaborative acts are considered as so-called continuous-violations, all persons who are participants until the completion of the crime will be the criminal. However if unfair collaborative acts are considered as so-called status-violations, persons who are only participants at the first cartel will be the criminal. In Korea this theme has been discussed in a judicial precedent and academic fields as well. It is nevertheless expected that attempt and completion of unfair collaborative acts will become an object of legal concern on and on. In this paper, therefore, we examined japanese cases and articles in a comparative legal perspective. Finally we have derived three implications as belows. First, legal interest infringement on unfair collaborative acts last until extinction of that unfair collaborative acts. Second, in principle, a point of a basic agreement is actus reus infringement and time of consummation. The principle however can be changed. It depends on the situation of each case. Third, formation or deviation of accomplice are possible during time between starting point and end point of unfair collaborative acts.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0