메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이지원 (계명대학교)
저널정보
중앙대학교 법학연구원 法學論文集 法學論文集 제41권 제2호
발행연도
2017.8
수록면
5 - 26 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Korean marriage is adopting a declaration of marriage or civil marriage requiring a certain form prescribed by law. Therefore, even if a husband and wife live together as a couple, if they do not report their marriage properly, they can not be legally recognized as a couple and can not receive various legal rights and protections that are recognized among married couples such as inheritance. A de facto marriage is not a legal marriage registered. But the de facto marriage is different from an engagement, from living with a concubine or an illicit intercourse, Scholars take up the position that the de facto marriage is a quasi marriage. The de facto marriage is similar to a legal marriage registered and is protected legally in case of cancellation of marriage. About matrimonial property achieved for the cooperation of parties during putative marriage, the liquidation of matrimonial property relation is reached because the right of division of matrimonial property has been acknowledged when de facto marriage relation has been annulled in life, according to Civil Act and the Korean Supreme Court. But, the cohabitant could not demand the division of matrimonial property when the other cohabitant had died. This is contrasted with the acknowledgement to the right of division of matrimonial property when legal marriage has been annulled for divorce, and with reaching of the liquidation because the right of inheritance has been acknowledged when it has been annulled for death. Ultimately, the protection for surviving spouse is the matter of whether it’s the acknowledgement of the right of inheritance or the right of division of matrimonial property when de facto marriage is terminated caused by the death of one cohabitant. Both the right of inheritance and the right of division of matrimonial property are possible to be the legislation because of their common ground the function of liquidation. The precedent determines that the if the marriage was terminated while both of the spouses were alive the claim for a partition of the property right could be granted while when the marriage was terminated by the decease of either spouse the living spouse cannot be granted with the claim for a partition of the property right but only with the right for inheritance of the properties of the deceased. In this regard the Supreme Court ruled that when the De Facto marriage was terminated by decease of one of the spouses the right for the partition of the property count not be granted to the living one. Further the precedent also determined that if both of the right of inheritance of the properties of the deceased and the right for the partition of the property were not to be granted it could be against the law's intent of protecting the relationship based on a De Facto marriage. But this is due to our legal system which does not include a spouse in a De Facto marriage as a successor and there was nothing that could be done in terms of the interpretation of the law while the perspective of law making was a separate issue. Therefore it is an imminent issue to be addressed to find a way to provide a balanced protection to such spouses.
#법률혼 #사실혼 배우자 #사실혼 해소 #상속권 #재산분할청구권 #De Facto marriage #cancellation of marriage #function of liquidation #inheritance right #right of division of matrimonial property

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (37)

참고문헌 신청
곽윤직 / 2004 / 상속법 / 박영사 google schola 김상용 / 2015 / 친족·상속법 / 법문사 google schola 김용한 / 2004 / 친족상속법 / 박영사 google schola 김주수 / 2012 / 친족·상속법 / 박영사 google schola 박동섭 / 2013 / 친족상속법 / 박영사 google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0