메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김병건 (건국대학교)
저널정보
한국문법교육학회 문법교육 문법 교육 제45권
발행연도
2022.8
수록면
1 - 33 (33page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study critically examines research performances of multiple-subject construction, which is still the great crux of Korean language academic circles, focusing on domestic journal papers since 2000. It is anticipated that this study will help in clarifying the part to explain more for understanding the multiple-subject construction. The study result showed that multiple-subject construction studies are mostly classified into studies, which define NP1 as a subject and others as predicate clause, complement (or object) and phrasal verb, and those that define NP2 as a subject and NP1 as an output of transformation or a topic (word). It was also revealed that quite a lot of studies think there is a secret of multiple-subject construction in the relation between NP1 and NP2, whatever NP1 or NP2 is a subject. All of devices for explaining the multiple-subject construction were found to have little theoretical weaknesses, whatever it is a predicate clause, phrasal verb or topic (word). ‘Cheolsuga nuni keuda’, ‘Oneuri nalssiga jota.’, ‘Sagwaga hongogi ppalgata.’ and ‘Cheolsuga gohyangi geuripda.’ have little different characteristics, but the description devices of studies only explained part of these. Therefore, some studies presented different explanations depending on individual factors, considering the multiple-subject construction as a complex phenomenon of language.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0