개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2023.2
- 수록면
- 240 - 276 (37page)
- DOI
- 10.38080/crh.2023.02.142.240
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The modern historiography of Japan, developed since the late 19th century, revealed the progress of the Japanese people in response to the demands of Japanese society, which developed modernization and imperialism at the same time after contact with the West. However, it is said that the Japanese thought of Japan in Asia after contact with the West, rejected the Chinese-centered worldview in the past, relativeized China and other Asian countries, and created the Tōyō as a new space centered on Japan. In Tōyō, Japan was the only one in Asia to succeed in Westernization out of Asia and lead the solidarity of Asia. Japanese historians’ study of Korean history was to explain the historical inevitability of the task of “Out of Asia” and “Asian Solidarity” that the Japanese imposed on themselves to achieve modernization and imperialism.
In order to explain the “Out of Asia” that only Japan was able to do, the others such like Korea and China, which were historically stagnant and failed, were essential. The view of Japanese historians to Korea’s past, which we have summarized as “the stagnation theory”, was aimed at reflecting Westernization, which was only possible by Japan. And in order to historically show that Japan was bound to be the leader of the Asian Solidarity, it had to reveal that the past of Japan, the island nation at the eastern end of Asia, was accompanied by the historical development of the Asian continent. At this time, the Korean history of the peninsula close to Japan takes on more important meaning to them. From their point of view, Korea is a place where the historical changes of the continent are condensed, with the absolute inuence of continental forces such as Manchuria, Mongolia, and China, and Japanese history can be linked to the historical changes of the continent as Japan has established relations with Korea since the beginning of history. What we have summarized as the “Heteronomy eory” of Korean history is to connect Japanese history to the historical development of the continent, and in this regard, the so-called “Heteronomy eory” opens the way for Japanese history to be newly organized around Japan. If so, the more prominent the character of Japan’s modern historiography is, the more stagnant and heteronomous the history of other Asian countries, including Korean history, is revealed.
Meanwhile, the view of colonialist historiography had its influence even after the war. This didn’t stop in Japanese academia after 1945, but it seems likely to affect American academia. e U.S. policy stance in the northeast Asia, which sought U.S. national interest and hegemony by blocking the spread of socialism centered on Japan, resembled the idea of Japanese historians who wanted to paint the Tōyō centered on Japan, talking Korea’s lack of feudalism and insisting on the impossibility of internal modernization.
In order to explain the “Out of Asia” that only Japan was able to do, the others such like Korea and China, which were historically stagnant and failed, were essential. The view of Japanese historians to Korea’s past, which we have summarized as “the stagnation theory”, was aimed at reflecting Westernization, which was only possible by Japan. And in order to historically show that Japan was bound to be the leader of the Asian Solidarity, it had to reveal that the past of Japan, the island nation at the eastern end of Asia, was accompanied by the historical development of the Asian continent. At this time, the Korean history of the peninsula close to Japan takes on more important meaning to them. From their point of view, Korea is a place where the historical changes of the continent are condensed, with the absolute inuence of continental forces such as Manchuria, Mongolia, and China, and Japanese history can be linked to the historical changes of the continent as Japan has established relations with Korea since the beginning of history. What we have summarized as the “Heteronomy eory” of Korean history is to connect Japanese history to the historical development of the continent, and in this regard, the so-called “Heteronomy eory” opens the way for Japanese history to be newly organized around Japan. If so, the more prominent the character of Japan’s modern historiography is, the more stagnant and heteronomous the history of other Asian countries, including Korean history, is revealed.
Meanwhile, the view of colonialist historiography had its influence even after the war. This didn’t stop in Japanese academia after 1945, but it seems likely to affect American academia. e U.S. policy stance in the northeast Asia, which sought U.S. national interest and hegemony by blocking the spread of socialism centered on Japan, resembled the idea of Japanese historians who wanted to paint the Tōyō centered on Japan, talking Korea’s lack of feudalism and insisting on the impossibility of internal modernization.
목차
1. 들어가며-과거 일본인 연구자들의 한국사 연구에 대한 인식의 지형
2. ‘식민주의 역사학’이라는 개념어의 등장, 의의와 한계
3. 동양, 탈아, 아시아연대 - 일본의 근대 역사학과 정체되고 타율적인 한국사
4. 결어를 대신하여 - 1945년 이후 식민주의 역사학의 지속 가능성
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
전후 미국학계에 소개된 한국사 연구와 식민주의 역사학
역사교육
2022 .09
-
한국 고등학교 일본어학습자의 대일(對日) 인식
일본어문학
2023 .02
-
‘아시아 경제사’와 근대일본 : 제국과 공업화
역사학보
2016 .12
-
일본문화교육 전후 일본이해도 차이 연구 ― 경남지역 대학생을 중심으로 ―
日本語敎育
2021 .09
-
일본에서 역사부정 그 비판과 수업실천
역사와 세계
2020 .12
-
From Pre-modern to Modern History in China, Japan, and Korea and the Implications for 21st Century Northeast Asia
Journal of Northeast Asian History
2016 .06
-
유럽과 비교를 통한 동북아의 ‘역사화해’의 가능성 : 독일-폴란드와 한국-일본을 중심으로
史叢(사총)
2015 .01
-
학설의 유령 - 당대 중국 동아시아사 인식 중의 ‘임나일본부설’
역사비평
2020 .05
-
History Education and Historical Reconciliation in East Asia: Focusing on the History Textbook Dialogues between South Korea and Japan
Journal of Northeast Asian History
2015 .06
-
한국의 2015 개정 교육과정과 일본의 현행 국가교육과정 비교 연구: 역사 교육과정을 중심으로
전북사학
2018 .01
-
한국 대학생의 한일관계개선의 결정요인 ― 경남지역 대학생을 중심으로 ―
日本語敎育
2021 .01
-
Politics of Asian Orientalism: Representation of Asian Migrant Others in Korean TV Shows
동서비교문학저널
2023 .06
-
Japanese Perspectives on "Global History"
The Asian review of world histories
2015 .01
-
언론을 통해 본 한일협정 인식 50년
역사비평
2015 .05
-
이병주의 대일인식과 한일협정의 기록
국제언어문학
2019 .12
-
일본차기학습지도요령에서 ‘역사종합’의 신설과 역사교육 개혁
역사교육
2016 .09
-
한일관계, 무엇을 할 것인가?
한국여성신학
2019 .06
-
<동아시아사> 교육과정 개정 논의를 위한 제언
역사교육논집
2021 .01
-
현행 일본 중학교 역사교과서의 근대 한일 관계 인식 - 청일전쟁, 러일전쟁을 중심으로-
역사교육논집
2021 .10
-
언론 빅데이터로 본 일본 문화에 대한 인식의 양상과 변화 소고(小考) -펜데믹을 전후로-
외국학연구
2022 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
역사 속의 비인간: 포스트휴머니즘 역사학의 현황과 쟁점
송충기
역사학보
2022
.12
1980년대 유사역사학의 확산과 그 성격
신항수
역사와실학
2021
.08
[조선후기] 2021~2022년 조선후기사 연구의 현황과 과제 - 내재적 발전론을 넘어 구조사의 새로운 방향 설정을 위한 과도기적 노력들 -
최주희
역사학보
2023
.09
중국 국가건설 100년의 역정과 역사학(Ⅰ) - 천하 패러다임의 해체와 근대 역사학 -
전인갑
역사학보
2022
.12
전후 미국학계에 소개된 한국사 연구와 식민주의 역사학
裵民才
,
鄭尙雨
역사교육
2022
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-905-000452735