지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제125호
- 발행연도
- 2022.9
- 수록면
- 485 - 518 (34page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2022.09.125.485
이용수
DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article is a critical review on studies that dealt with the beginning and end of Korea’s relationship with the outside world during the so-called “Open Port period.” Primarily examined here are two accomplishments, which would be Shin Hyo Seung’s Shinmi Yang’yo, which examined the armed conflict between Joseon and the U.S. that broke out in 1871, and Han Seong-min’s Study of Japan’s “Annexation of Korea,” which examined the process that took place in 1910.
For a long time, the Korean historical community defined this “Open Port period” as an era when Korea opened its gates to the outside world and pursued Western-style modernization. But in reality, Korea faced external forces’ political and economic invasions of the Korean peninsula during this period. In the end, Korea was even colonized by Japan in 1910, through the “Korea-Japan Annexation Treaty” Historical studies that examined Korea’s foreign relations in this period concentrated their efforts on determining the nature of invasions from outside forces, but in the process invited some criticism for depicting Korea as a mere object of the situation.
It should be noted that both studies mentioned above tried to perceive Korea as one of the Main bodies in action throughout the situation. They endeavor to overcome the previous dichotomous approach which has viewed everything as either “invasion” or “resistance.” Their efforts generated some noteworthy results: First, they managed to escape from a previous notion which considered the U.S. and Japan only as ‘superpower states,’ and instead they offer an objective assessment of both countries’ real conditions at the time of their advances on the Korean peninsula. Second, from a global historical standpoint, these studies attempt to examine the relationship between Korea and the U.S., and Korea and Japan for that matter, on a multiple levels. Third, they effectively pave a way for a new kind of studies, which would hopefully focus on the historical events’ “East Asian” context, and the inter-connected nature of World history.
For a long time, the Korean historical community defined this “Open Port period” as an era when Korea opened its gates to the outside world and pursued Western-style modernization. But in reality, Korea faced external forces’ political and economic invasions of the Korean peninsula during this period. In the end, Korea was even colonized by Japan in 1910, through the “Korea-Japan Annexation Treaty” Historical studies that examined Korea’s foreign relations in this period concentrated their efforts on determining the nature of invasions from outside forces, but in the process invited some criticism for depicting Korea as a mere object of the situation.
It should be noted that both studies mentioned above tried to perceive Korea as one of the Main bodies in action throughout the situation. They endeavor to overcome the previous dichotomous approach which has viewed everything as either “invasion” or “resistance.” Their efforts generated some noteworthy results: First, they managed to escape from a previous notion which considered the U.S. and Japan only as ‘superpower states,’ and instead they offer an objective assessment of both countries’ real conditions at the time of their advances on the Korean peninsula. Second, from a global historical standpoint, these studies attempt to examine the relationship between Korea and the U.S., and Korea and Japan for that matter, on a multiple levels. Third, they effectively pave a way for a new kind of studies, which would hopefully focus on the historical events’ “East Asian” context, and the inter-connected nature of World history.
목차
머리말
1. 한국, 객체에서 ‘행위주체’로 등장하다
2. 미국과 일본, 초강대국이 아닌 ‘현실형’ 외세가 되다
3. 개항기를 새롭게 조망할 수 있는 후속 연구를 기대하다
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
개항기 대외관계사 연구 현황(2000~2021)과 과제
史叢(사총)
2022 .09
-
한일관계, 무엇을 할 것인가?
한국여성신학
2019 .06
-
언론을 통해 본 한일협정 인식 50년
역사비평
2015 .05
-
한국의 2015 개정 교육과정과 일본의 현행 국가교육과정 비교 연구: 역사 교육과정을 중심으로
전북사학
2018 .01
-
독도 영유권에 대한 전후 연합국의 영토처리
일본문화학보
2020 .05
-
일본의 ‘죽도’ 고유영토론 날조에 관한 분석 - 일본의회의사록을 중심으로 -
일본문화학보
2022 .05
-
현대 한일관계사 연구의 회고와 전망
한일관계사연구
2018 .05
-
The Shift of the International System and Japan-Korea Relations
Journal of Contemporary Korean Studies
2015 .12
-
소프트파워 자원에 대한 상호 평가와 한일관계
일본연구
2015 .01
-
韓・日關係의 問題와 對應方法
日本語敎育
2019 .01
-
Treaties Leading to Japan’s Annexation of Korea : What Are the Problems?
Korea Journal
2016 .12
-
1960년대 중반~1970년대 초, 서울 소재 일본인 유골 송환
역사비평
2021 .11
-
한일대학생의 상대국가·상대문화에 대한 관심도에 관한 연구(2) -일본대학생을 중심으로-
일본문화학보
2023 .05
-
프랑스의 1910년 한일병합과 그 결과에 대한 인식
史叢(사총)
2016 .01
-
한국 대학교수를 통해 본 일본 유학에 대한 인식변화
재외한인연구
2024 .02
-
이병주의 대일인식과 한일협정의 기록
국제언어문학
2019 .12
-
일본 과거사 문제와 한중의 대응
일본문화연구
2015 .01
-
History Education and Historical Reconciliation in East Asia: Focusing on the History Textbook Dialogues between South Korea and Japan
Journal of Northeast Asian History
2015 .06
-
한․중․일 역사 갈등, 그리고 역사인식 공유
한중인문학연구
2016 .01
-
전후 미국학계에 소개된 한국사 연구와 식민주의 역사학
역사교육
2022 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-911-000127324