메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이상한 (충북대학교)
저널정보
한양법학회 한양법학 한양법학 제33권 제1집(통권 제77집)
발행연도
2022.2
수록면
33 - 57 (25page)
DOI
10.35227/HYLR.2022.2.33.1.33

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The judge ruled that the order “efforts shall be made to restore damage caused by criminal acts”, which was a special observation of the probation, shall not be applied to those subject to community service order regarding the imposition of special observation for restoration to the original state while ordering the accused to do community service, Originally, the restorative justice by doing the restoration to its original state through community service order was considered but the restoration is limited by doing the community service order. Thus, the special observation was used as a method of restoration. However, it is controversial to enforce the content of restoration as a special observation due to the characteristics of community services. In relation to this, this study discusses the observations of community service order and investigates the possibility to adopt the restoration order scheme. First, this study identified the legal characteristics through the general reviews on the community service order and reviewed the possibility and methods to adopt the restoration scheme as an improvement measure. For special observations in the current community service order, it is necessary to develop and enforce special observations of community service order with various and effective contents because the current special observations are not matched with the characteristics of community service order. It is also desirable to specify special observations that limited the basic right of the subject directly in acts rather than in enforcement decrees. In addition, it is deemed necessary to adopt a restoration order scheme as a method to realize restorative justice. It is reasonable to introduce a restoration order as a punishment means for realistic protection of the victims while reviving punishment if the restoration order is not fulfilled in case of not fulfilling the restoration order in combination with punishment.

목차

[대상판결] 대법원 2020.11.5. 선고 2017도18291 판결
[평석]
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-360-001169156