메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김한종 (성신여자대학교)
저널정보
충북대학교 법학연구소 법학연구 법학연구 제29권 제2호
발행연도
2018.1
수록면
273 - 304 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Corporation director is a member of board of directors and bears duty of care by entrusting relationship of civil law and fiduciary duty regulated by commercial law. Aside from these fundamental duties, commercial law regulates various titles or vice titles to demand the director to perform its own duty properly. The director is in a position easily accessible to main information of the corporation related with his/her business operation. Therefore in spite of various duties demanded by commercial law, it is easy for the director to preferentially aim for his/her or third party benefit, sacrificing corporation benefit by using director position in case of corporation and director interest conflict. Especially when the director is having business with the corporation, these concerns have higher risk of actualization, increasing the risk of corporation or stockholder damage. So in order to prevent corporation or stockholder damage, commercial law has been regulating director’s self-dealing by Article 389, since 1963, at the time when commercial law entered into force. However, previous commercial law regulations had trouble of dealing effectively with changing environment, so the voice demanding improvement got louder, resulting in the start of revision work of self-dealing regulation in commercial law since 2005 to 2011. Commercial law has changed Article 398 at 2011 revision, and the main contents are self-dealing target extension, stating board approval as prior approval, and resolution requirement reinforcement, which is more than two thirds of the board. Also, for board approval, duty of disclosure has been imposed, and further more, procedural fairness and substantive fairness has been added. By strictly limiting director’s self-dealing and specifically fixing its requirement, commercial law has improved Article 398, therefore receiving positive evaluation. However, even though huge improvement has been made by 2011 revision, commercial law Article 398 still shows incomplete and uncertain side in its content, and is thought to have interpretative moot point in applying in practice. Therefore, the problem of current director’s self-dealing regulating system is expected to be supplemented and improved, through application of the law in practice by judicial authority leading into the arrangement of reasonable guidelines and active academic study.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (34)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0