지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2021.8
- 수록면
- 165 - 186 (22page)
- DOI
- 10.35227/HYLR.2021.8.32.3.165
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In order for sound corporate governance to function effectively, proper behavior of directors is important in corporate operations. Our commercial law stipulates the right to collect information from directors in the form of reporting claims. That is, Article 393 requires the Director to report to the Board at least once every three months to ensure that the Director has the right to collect information in the form of a reporting claim to require the Representative to report to the Board on other directors or employees’ work. Such information collection rights are stipulated in the form of reporting claims, so there are inherent limitations, concerns about the concealment of unfavorable information or the provision of false information, and concerns about the CEO’s involvement due to the indirectness of regulations.
This paper reviews the contents of the company’s information collection rights by U.S. directors, which are considered a major model of the company’s information collection rights under our commercial law. Based on this, we would like to obtain useful suggestions on the form of company information collection rights by directors under our commercial law.
In Korea, the method of supervising work by individual directors through the board of directors lacks speed, and as a result, it is difficult to expect a mobile supervisory function by directors. In order to improve the supervisory function of the board of directors and make it effective, it is necessary to consider recognizing the right to collect company information for individual directors. In particular, it can be thought of as a necessary method to exercise supervisory functions by outside directors. These measures are also expected to have positive results in securing transparency in corporate management.
The recognition of the right to collect company information to the director may serve as the basis for the pursuit of responsibility if the right is not exercised properly behind it. It is possible to think of concerns that it could shrink directors, but it is highly necessary to recognize the right to collect company information to enhance the function of management supervision. However, certain restrictions will need to be set on the purpose or target of the event. Measures to prevent information leakage are also needed, with directors exercising their right to collect information from the company as informants. A way to increase its effectiveness is to conclude an agreement on confidentiality to prevent restrictions on investigation targets or fraudulent use of information by the court, while imposing certain sanctions if violated.
This paper reviews the contents of the company’s information collection rights by U.S. directors, which are considered a major model of the company’s information collection rights under our commercial law. Based on this, we would like to obtain useful suggestions on the form of company information collection rights by directors under our commercial law.
In Korea, the method of supervising work by individual directors through the board of directors lacks speed, and as a result, it is difficult to expect a mobile supervisory function by directors. In order to improve the supervisory function of the board of directors and make it effective, it is necessary to consider recognizing the right to collect company information for individual directors. In particular, it can be thought of as a necessary method to exercise supervisory functions by outside directors. These measures are also expected to have positive results in securing transparency in corporate management.
The recognition of the right to collect company information to the director may serve as the basis for the pursuit of responsibility if the right is not exercised properly behind it. It is possible to think of concerns that it could shrink directors, but it is highly necessary to recognize the right to collect company information to enhance the function of management supervision. However, certain restrictions will need to be set on the purpose or target of the event. Measures to prevent information leakage are also needed, with directors exercising their right to collect information from the company as informants. A way to increase its effectiveness is to conclude an agreement on confidentiality to prevent restrictions on investigation targets or fraudulent use of information by the court, while imposing certain sanctions if violated.
목차
Ⅰ. 서언
Ⅱ. 미국 회사법상 이사의 회사정보수집권
Ⅲ. 회사지배구조의 원리와 이사의 회사정보수집권
Ⅳ. 모범사업회사법과의 관계
Ⅴ. 결어
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
우리는 이사회에게 무엇을 기대할 것인가 - 이사회 실패 현상을 극복하기 위한 대안으로서 법인이사론을 중심으로 -
경영법률
2015 .01
-
여성이사가 기업의 사회적 책임 성과에 미치는 영향
한국무역경영연구
2023 .01
-
기업특성 및 사외이사 특징이 기업의 부정행위에 미치는 영향: 중국상장기업을 중심으로
아태비즈니스연구
2021 .09
-
대리인문제와 외부감시주체가 여성의 이사회 참여에 미치는 영향
경영학연구
2021 .12
-
공기업의 근로자이사 관련 법제에 대한 검토
경제법연구
2022 .08
-
사외이사의 보상과 조세회피의 관계
상업교육연구
2018 .01
-
비상근이사의 감시의무
기업법연구
2017 .06
-
Outside Directors on Corporate Boards: Background and Behavior
[KDI] KDI FOCUS
2015 .10
-
주식회사 이사의 보수연동형 손해배상한도액 설정제도
비교사법
2017 .08
-
사외이사의 실질적 영향력과 투자효율성
경영교육연구
2020 .02
-
여성 임원과 이익의 정보유용성
관리회계연구
2022 .08
-
일본 회사법상 지배구조개혁을 둘러싼 최근 동향 - 개정법상 사외이사설치의 의무화와 관련하여 -
경영법률
2015 .01
-
이사의 감시의무와 그 적용범위 — 대법원 2017다222368 판결을 중심으로 —
법학논총
2022 .03
-
상법상 이사의 충실의무와 회사기회유용금지에 관한 재고(再考)
상사판례연구
2024 .09
-
Institutional Proposals for Enhancing Board Diversity in Chinese Companies
중국지역연구
2024 .02
-
회사법에서 선관주의의무규정에 관한 고찰
경영법률
2015 .01
-
재임기간에 따른 사외이사 비율과 기업가치
아태비즈니스연구
2020 .01
-
준법경영을 위한 지배구조상의 일반적 관리체계와 그 문제점
한양법학
2015 .05
-
이사 후보에 대한 의결권 반대 사유와 이사회 효율성 및 기업가치와의 관계
경영학연구
2022 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0