메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김병옥 (한국산업안전보건공단)
저널정보
충북대학교 법학연구소 법학연구 법학연구 제28권 제2호
발행연도
2017.1
수록면
163 - 212 (50page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The safety care obligation in Korea is recognized by theory and precedent without being stipulated in the Civil Act and etc. Also, because the safety care obligation of company owners has been discussed focusing on the claim for damages based on the aggressive contract infringement of the article 39 of the Civil Act until now, there has not been specific legal development on the legal requirements and their contents for the recognition of the right to demand adequate measures or to refuse hazardous work that enables to ask employers to improve the risk situation before industrial injuries occur, other than the discussion by some labor law scholars. In Germany, the article 618 of BGB stipulates that the duty of safety care of employers is recognized. In the view of the fact providing labour cannot be separated from the personality of employee, safety care obligation has a significant meaning in the labor contract. If an employer does not fulfil the obligation, workers are entitled to the right to demand adequate measures and the right to refuse hazardous work other than the right to claim for damages. According to many precedents and theories, safety care obligation is understood as additional duty or protection obligation. The Act on the industrial safety and health has meaning of public law in the scope to impose obligations on employers. And also the Act has meaning of private law in terms of supplementing and specifying the contents of safety care obligation of employers. In Japan, since safety care obligation was clearly defined and constituted as default liability by the judgement of Supreme Court in February 5, 1975, it has been settled by precedents and theories. The definition of the obligation can be said to generalize safety care obligation by combining safety care obligation and protection duty in Germany. The safety care obligation was clearly stipulated in the article 5 of Labor Contract Act in effect since March 2008. If an employer does not carry out the obligations, workers are entitled to claiming damages, demanding adequate measures and refusing to provide labor. The articles in the Labor Safety and Health Act has meaning of public law in the scope to impose employers on obligations, and also it has meaning of private law in terms of supplementing and specifying the contents of safety care obligation of employers. In Korea, considering that industrial injuries are very important to workers, the safety care obligation of employers should be clearly stipulated. And the contents of safety care obligation should be enlarged from the improvement of physical and human environment to the physical and mental health care of workers. Furthermore, if the employers do not fulfill safety care obligation, it is necessary to recognize the right of demanding adequate measures and refusing to provide labor for workers in the aspect of prevention of industrial injuries. By doing this, it is considered that safety care obligation of employers can play an important role to protect workers from the risk of industrial injuries. But considering the reality of labor relations in Korea, the system should be designed so that labor unions can refrain from abusing these rights, in terms of fairness and faithfulness.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (30)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0