메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
안정호 (한림대학교)
저널정보
대구가톨릭대학교 인문과학연구소 인문과학연구 인문과학연구 제41호
발행연도
2020.1
수록면
125 - 149 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this research is to set appropriate standards for paraphrasing when writing multiple-choice reading questions for testing literal comprehension ability and to make suggestions for appropriate paraphrasing based on the results obtained through test-item analysis. Three main criteria were set for evaluating the level of adequacy in paraphrasing, which includes the adequacy of the paraphrased unit, the consistency of meaning between the original and the paraphrased texts, and the linguistic level of paraphrased text. The unit of the paraphrasing should be done at the syntactic level rather than at the lexical level, and the meanings of the original and the paraphrased texts must exactly match. In addition, the language level of the paraphrased text ought to be equal to or lower than that of the original text. Based on these criteria, the items measuring literal comprehension ability in the TOPIK(Test of Proficiency in Korean) were analysed. First, observing the adequacy of the paraphrased unit, it was found that although paraphrasing was done mostly at the syntactic level, there were more lexical-level paraphrasing in the beginner level than the intermediate and advanced level. Next, the results showed that there were more discrepancies of meaning in the intermediate and advanced level than the beginner level, and more cases of inconsistencies in syntactic-level paraphrasing than the lexical-level paraphrasing. Lastly, it revealed that the ratio of the linguistic level of the paraphrased text being higher than that of the original text were somewhat higher in the beginner level than the intermediate and advanced level. Thus, when creating multiple-choice items for assessing literal comprehension ability, it is necessary to construct the questions based upon these criteria of the adequacy and to check the items against the criteria in the editing stage.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0