지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제120호
- 발행연도
- 2021.6
- 수록면
- 29 - 75 (47page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2021.06.120.29
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Examined in this article is how Nihonshoki(日本書紀) has been studied in Japan since the 1990s, and what have been the main points of contention. Also presented here are studies of “Jin’gu-ki(神功紀),” “Oh’ujin-ki(應神紀)” and “Nintoku-ki(仁德紀)” chapters, which also contain references related to the ancient history of Korea.
In part 1 of this article, trends and contention points recently featured in Nihonshoki studies are first examined. Regarding studies that dealt with the Nihonshoki text itself, those which focused on all the sources cited(出典論), or the contents of the text, how it was structured(區分論) and how it was compiled(編修論) are reviewed. Meanwhile, for archaeological studies the relationship between Nihonshoki studies and the 7th century wooden “Mokgan” tablets is spotted and reviewed.
Next, in the first half of this article’s part 2, individual studies of the “Jin’gu-ki,” “Oh’ujin-ki” and “Nintoku-ki” chapters are examined. Many of them have focused on how the myths for the three Denno Emperors were formed, how those myths were changed or altered in later periods, and how past historical figures were depicted and described(人物像), while also quite a few of them focused on each of the aforementioned chapters. Following a review of those studies, several other studies that have analyzed certain references to Korean-Japanese exchanges and relations, which can be found from all the three chapters, are examined in part 2’s second half. Noteworthy ones among such studies include ‘immigrant(渡來人) studies’ based on archaeological findings that have been newly secured since the 1990s, as well as the reexamination on the 5th century international relationships which demands new interpretations of existing texts.
Recently in terms of Nihonshoki studies, the Japanese academic circle seems to be more interested in the text itself or the time when compilation of the text actually occurred, than it is in recreating past history based on this very text. Such pattern probably is due to Nihonshoki being generally viewed as a product of significant embellishment of historical facts based on the 8th century Japanese people’s idea of(or aspiring for) a Legal State. In the future, we should monitor certain new attempts that may appear in Japanese studies, like approaching Nihonshoki from a different angle based on archaeological findings or new critical reexamination of the text.
In part 1 of this article, trends and contention points recently featured in Nihonshoki studies are first examined. Regarding studies that dealt with the Nihonshoki text itself, those which focused on all the sources cited(出典論), or the contents of the text, how it was structured(區分論) and how it was compiled(編修論) are reviewed. Meanwhile, for archaeological studies the relationship between Nihonshoki studies and the 7th century wooden “Mokgan” tablets is spotted and reviewed.
Next, in the first half of this article’s part 2, individual studies of the “Jin’gu-ki,” “Oh’ujin-ki” and “Nintoku-ki” chapters are examined. Many of them have focused on how the myths for the three Denno Emperors were formed, how those myths were changed or altered in later periods, and how past historical figures were depicted and described(人物像), while also quite a few of them focused on each of the aforementioned chapters. Following a review of those studies, several other studies that have analyzed certain references to Korean-Japanese exchanges and relations, which can be found from all the three chapters, are examined in part 2’s second half. Noteworthy ones among such studies include ‘immigrant(渡來人) studies’ based on archaeological findings that have been newly secured since the 1990s, as well as the reexamination on the 5th century international relationships which demands new interpretations of existing texts.
Recently in terms of Nihonshoki studies, the Japanese academic circle seems to be more interested in the text itself or the time when compilation of the text actually occurred, than it is in recreating past history based on this very text. Such pattern probably is due to Nihonshoki being generally viewed as a product of significant embellishment of historical facts based on the 8th century Japanese people’s idea of(or aspiring for) a Legal State. In the future, we should monitor certain new attempts that may appear in Japanese studies, like approaching Nihonshoki from a different angle based on archaeological findings or new critical reexamination of the text.
목차
머리말
1. 최근 『일본서기』 연구의 주요 쟁점과 경향
2. 1990년대 이후 일본학계의 신공·응신·인덕기 연구
맺음말을 대신하여 - 『일본서기』를 활용한 연구의 새로운 시도 -
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
일본의 패전과 천황의 전쟁 책임 : ‘성단’과 평화주의의 허구
동북아역사논총
2015 .12
-
아키히토[明仁] 천황의 ‘황실외교’에 관한 연구 - 중국 방문을 중심으로
인문학연구
2021 .08
-
메이지유신 이후 천황제와 大韓國國制의 비교 -전제군주권적 측면에서-
한국민족운동사연구
2015 .01
-
여성과 천황제 - 미시마 유키오(三島由紀夫) 문학의 여성상을 중심으로 -
人文科學硏究
2021 .08
-
근대일본에서 천황－국가적 ‘주체’ 개념의 형성 — 천황주권설파의 ‘통치권의 주체’ 해석을 중심으로 —
개념과 소통
2017 .01
-
고대 일본의 즉위 宣命과 皇位 계승의 논리
역사와 담론
2020 .04
-
메이지 천황의 ‘신성’함의 기원들 ― 메이지헌법 신성불가침 조항의 의미에 대하여 ―
일본학보
2021 .11
-
안덕천황(安德天皇) 기사(記事) 탐색에 드러난 조선후기 통신사의 일본 정치체제 인식
인문학연구
2019 .12
-
A Comprehensive Analysis of the Research of Chinese Five Emperors Era from the Perspective of Its Systematic Historical Literature
한중언어문화연구
2015 .06
-
제국 일본의 엽서 - 강제늑약 및 천황과 전쟁을 중심으로
아시아문화연구
2019 .12
-
『백호통의』의 생성과 그 정치적 의미- 황권옹호와 황권제한의 이중구조 -
유학연구
2016 .08
-
일제강점기 초등교과서에 표상된 明治天皇 : 조선총독부 편찬 ‘역사교과서’를 중심으로
일어일문학
2017 .05
-
조선 후기 科試 연구와 『承政院日記』의 활용
동방한문학
2020 .01
-
近代韓ㆍ日ㆍ臺灣의 국정교과서에 ‘天皇’으로 표상된 帝國의 식민교육 -1910년대 초등 <일본어교과서>를 중심으로-
일어일문학
2023 .11
-
고려 무인정권기 명종의 현실인식과 정치운영
한국사연구
2015 .03
-
일본 내부 `우익`의 차이성과 천황국가론
한일관계사연구
2015 .08
-
‘제국 일본’의 제신, 메이지천황의 탄생
동양사학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2019 .04
-
근대국가 일본의 형성과정과 그 구조 - 전통에서 소환한 근대 -
동아시아고대학
2019 .01
-
일본 고대 천황의 왕위(王威)에 대한 고찰 －헤이안(平安)시기를 중심으로－
인문과학연구
2020 .12
-
이세신궁의 기원 : 네 가지 학설을 중심으로
종교연구
2019 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-911-001879350