메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김유 (성균관대학교)
저널정보
한국현대영미드라마학회 현대영미드라마 현대영미드라마 제33권 제3호
발행연도
2020.12
수록면
99 - 128 (30page)
DOI
10.29163/jmed.2020.12.33.3.99

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Trevor Griffiths’ criticism of the Labour Party in Bill Brand, a 1976 TV drama series about a left-wing Labour MP, is closely linked with a recurrent theme in his cannon, the possibility of socialist revolution in Britain via parliamentary socialism. Bill Brand is based on Griffiths’ critique of Labourism, one of the traditional ideologies for the British Left which sees the Labour Party as “only one true vehicle for progressive politics.” In Bill Brand Griffiths criticises Labourism from a structural perspective rather than personal integrity and depicts the Labour Party as an interest group with the first and foremost purpose of the maintenance of political power, thus alienating the working class.
This paper examines the criticism of the Labour Party and Labourism in Bill Brand in terms of intra-party democracy and the relationship between the party and extra-parliamentary socialist activities. It begins with an investigation into the unique status of Brand as the New Left, tracing his activities in the public and private areas. Brand’s public activities in the parliament disclose “the actual tissue and texture, of the social democratic processes within a major party” and demonstrate the Labour Party confined to anti-democratic decision-making. Brand’s private life with Alex, a feminist activist, is also related to the criticism of Labourism, displaying Brand’s deeply entrenched patriarchal masculinity as a product of the party machine. Bill Brand is distinguishable in that it aims to seek “connective tissue between electoral party politics, which still has a mystifying mass appeal, and extra-parliamentary socialist activity.” However, the play stops short of presenting those significant connections, showing Brand at the crossroads. It leaves a key question, ‘is the Labour Party still the one and only vehicle for socialist change?,’ further complicating a dilemma over the troubled relationship between parliamentary socialism and extra-parliamentary social movements.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 새로운 정치 세대로서의 브랜드
Ⅲ. 의회 안의 브랜드: 의회 정치의 구조적 한계와 모순
Ⅳ. 의회 밖의 브랜드: 대중에 대한 인식과 사생활
Ⅴ. 나가는 말
인용 문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0